Our Sponsor Sideshow Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Reading Room:
What are Ogres in Tolkien's Middle-earth?
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Otaku-sempai
Immortal


Mar 20, 8:03pm

Post #1 of 30 (417 views)
Shortcut
What are Ogres in Tolkien's Middle-earth? Can't Post


Quote
"Poor Bilbo sat in the dark thinking of all the horrible names of all the giants and ogres he had ever heard told of in tales, but not one of them had done all these things." -- The Hobbit, "Riddles in the Dark"


So, what are ogres in Tolkien's Middle-earth? Is this just another name for giants or trolls, or are ogres some other kind of monster or even completely imaginary creatures of folktale and legend?



“Hell hath no fury like that of the uninvolved.” - Tony Isabella


Felagund
Gondor


Mar 22, 7:21pm

Post #2 of 30 (382 views)
Shortcut
ogres! [In reply to] Can't Post

My first thought when reading your question was the way Tolkien describes Morgoth, in 'Myths Transformed' (HoMe X).


Quote
He [Morgoth] had become absorbed in 'kingship', and though a tyrant of ogre-size and monstrous power, this was a vast fall from even his former wickedness of hate, and his terrible nihilism.


Although 'the fall' appears to have been Tolkien's main point here, we do see the use 'ogre-size' as a means of illustrating scale. If we blend this with the various descriptions of Morgoth in his duel with Fingolfin or when Lúthien and Beren encounter him in Angband, then it appears that 'ogre-size' was huge indeed! Synonymous with 'giant', perhaps?

This doesn't tell us much about a 'species' called 'ogres' though. About as much as I can find in that regard is a reference in The Book of Lost Tales Volume II, where you can track back to drafts that still locate the Valar in a procreative framework. A note to 'The Fall of Gondolin' describes the Balrog Gothmog as "a son of Melko and the ogress Fluithuin". Precisely 'what' Fluithuin is, I don't know and would have to delve deeper – if indeed Tolkien ever clarified. A corrupted Maia, perhaps? There's some other passing ogre references in the The Book of Lost Tales duo, including to 'cannibal-ogres' ('The Tale of Eärendel'), who strike me as less Ainur and more Laistrygonian, the man-eating giants who appear in Homer's Odyssey.

I know that Silvered-glass is a close student of the material from this period of writing and may have thoughts or other references to hand.

Welcome to the Mordorfone network, where we put the 'hai' back into Uruk


CMackintosh
Rivendell

Apr 28, 10:53am

Post #3 of 30 (251 views)
Shortcut
Ogres = corrupted Maiar's offspring? [In reply to] Can't Post

At least that's the conclusion I drew from reading all the various texts. Probably, if corrupted Maiar were used by Melkor to breed orcs and trolls, then tales of giant orcs and trolls that occasionally appear in the HoME series of texts, are probably their offspring.


Otaku-sempai
Immortal


Apr 28, 2:19pm

Post #4 of 30 (246 views)
Shortcut
Ogres and Giants [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
Ogres = corrupted Maiar's offspring?

At least that's the conclusion I drew from reading all the various texts. Probably, if corrupted Maiar were used by Melkor to breed orcs and trolls, then tales of giant orcs and trolls that occasionally appear in the HoME series of texts, are probably their offspring.


Maybe -- that might also explain the Middle-earth origin of giants in general, similar to the Biblical Nephilim. Or maybe giants are physical incarnations of elemental beings.

“Hell hath no fury like that of the uninvolved.” - Jenny Blake Isabella


Maciliel
Valinor


Mon, 9:38pm

Post #5 of 30 (122 views)
Shortcut
the issue with all the non-valar, non-ainar entities [In reply to] Can't Post

 
the issue with all the non-valar, non-maiar entities is -- are they their own entities, with their own agencies? or are they just very fancy biological puppets?

and what is shelob? she seems to be her own entity.

are there differing levels of agency?

morgoth and sauron cannot create true life, but they can corrupt it.

do their horrible machinations take X amount of "true life" from a corrupted being, and meld it with "true life" from another being, to make a super-creature, like a dragon?

do they take X amount of "true life" from a corrupted being and disperse it amongst an army of (less-powerful) puppets, who have diluted power as individuals, but combined power en masse?


cheers --

..a


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo


CuriousG
Half-elven


Tue, 5:11pm

Post #6 of 30 (114 views)
Shortcut
Definitely agree Shelob has agency [In reply to] Can't Post

But how much do Orcs have? Isn't it hard to imagine, credibly, that a bunch of Orcs swear off violence, take up gardening, and move to Hobbiton where they live gently and amicably, and only steal spoons because Lobelia did, and all because they chose to? I would say they couldn't, because they don't have that much agency. They can decide *how* they will maim, kill, plunder, but they can't decide to do anything besides those things.


Maciliel
Valinor


Wed, 4:50am

Post #7 of 30 (111 views)
Shortcut
sometimes an orc is just an orc [In reply to] Can't Post

 
this makes sense to me (what you're saying about orcs not being able to decide not to be orcs but having the choice of how to be orcs).

when sauron was vanquished, was he killed? he was diminished, but did some (ineffectual) spark of him remain? do orcs exist without sauron being "alive"? can they exist with a sauron who is diminished? do they all keel over without him?

and what of ogres, trolls, and dragons?

melkor created the dragons, and (iirc) he was cast out of arda altogether. dragons persisted after him. as did trolls.

trolls are not in the same power class as dragons. were they corrupted maiar? i'm assuming any corrupted maia still retained agency after the corruption (which makes sense to me, when considering dragons).

but trolls do not seem maiar-ish to me. maybe there was an uber-maia-troll adam and an uber-maia-troll eve and they spawned all the lesser trolls? so if trolls are not corrupted maiar, how did they retain their "aliveness" after the passing of sauron? if they were just puppets animated by sauron's evilness, wouldn't they keel over when he passed? marionettes whose strings were abruptly clipped?

similar thoughts re ogres, who seem to be a more advanced type of troll. bigger. meaner. (smarter?)

shelob, as always, is in a class by herself.


cheers --

.


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo


noWizardme
Half-elven


Wed, 10:30am

Post #8 of 30 (113 views)
Shortcut
Those wicked orcs... [In reply to] Can't Post

By co-incidence I arrived wanting to post something that turns out to be relevant, and wondering where best to put it.

I wanted to quote a Voronwë the Faithful post in this conversation https://thehalloffire.net/...p?t=379&start=20
It's a very fine conversation BTW - started in 2006 ans still seeming to be going strong. I can recommend it.


Quote
Okay. The dilemma has been pretty well stated by Prim and Sassy.

On the one hand, like Prim I believe that it is absolutely imperative that the Orcs do not have redeemable souls. I believe the whole moral structure of LOTR and indeed all of Tolkien's work collapses like a house of cards if they did.

On the other hand, as Sassy demonstrates, the only possible conclusion that one can reach from the full body of Tolkien's work is that the Orcs came from beings that did have souls (fëa), possibly men but also undoubtedly including Elves corrupted and twisted by Melkor (and even possibly some Maian spirits, which she doesn't mention).

How then can these two seemingly contradictory points be reconciled? The answer comes from a surprising source.

But before I go there I wanted to make another point. There is some precedent in Tolkien's writing for the idea expressed in Myth's Transformed that despite having speech and even cleverness the Orcs possessed no 'rational soul' or fëa. In the chapter "Of the Coming of the Elves" in the Later Quenta Silmarillion (published in Morgoth's Ring) (in what appears in the second paragraph of chapter three of the published Sil) in talking about the Balrogs the word "(ëalar)" appeared after "These were the" and before the word "spirits" with a footnote explaining that this word did not refer to an incarnate spirit, which was "fëa" and that it simply referred to "being". Thus the Balrogs themselves, as powerful as they were, and even being the first ancient spirits that allied themselves with Morgoth, were seen as merely having "being" and NOT having incarnate souls. I believe the explanation that I point to below must apply to them as well.

Okay, turning back to the paradox described above. How do I explain how the Orcs could not have incarnate souls when they were derived from beings that did have incarnate souls. I find the answer in, of all places, the Athrabeth. As I have discussed before, one of the key concepts discussed in the commentary and notes that follow the Athrabeth is the idea that "the separation of fëa and hröa is 'unnatural', and proceeds not from the original design but from the 'Marring of Arda', which is due to the operations of Melkor." It is from this concept that I derive my answer to the dilemma.

The Orcs originated from the hröar of originally incarnate beings (whether Elves or Men or both, and even as I believe Tolkien suggests at one point in Myths Transformed from some Maian spirits as well) that Melkor managed to separate from their fëar. Like the Balrogs these corrupted beings had "ëalar" or "being" but not "fëar" or souls. They had no wills of their own, but rather were animated by Melkor's own will, and later by Sauron's as Melkor's proxy. They were similar in that way to the beings created by Aulë before Eru took pity on him and them and gave them their own independent wills.

This would even explain why, as Prim, pointed out, the Orcs "magically" died when Sauron was destroyed; with no will of their own there was nothing to animate them once Melkor's proxy was destroyed.

As for Sassy's final quote, I don't see anything there that is an obstacle to this explanation. If these former Elves were mated with Men, it must have been Men who similarly had been stripped of their fëar (and beasts never had fëar in the first place). As for them going to Mandos and held in prison until the End when they died, that sounds like a reasonable precaution to prevent Melkor from re-animating them and causing even more mischief.

As for Saruman breeding Men and Orcs, I don't believe it for a second, and I don't believe that anywhere does it categorically say that he did so; it is only speculation. No, those "half-Orcs" were simply Orcs that Saruman through his dark arts was able to make appear more man-like but still had no fëar of their own.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it. ;)
Voronwë the Faithful post in this conversation https://thehalloffire.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=379&start=20



So that seems to me to be a workable answer -- the best I've seen -- to the whole 'are orcs (or other evil creatures) irredeemably evil issue'. And it interested me not least because a while back (September 2024!) I wrote a long (5-part!) piece on this (starting here, should anyone be interested). But I didn't know about the sources Voronwë the Faithful cites here, or reach that conclusion.

~~~~~~
"I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.


Voronwë_the_Faithful
Valinor

Wed, 7:08pm

Post #9 of 30 (98 views)
Shortcut
Thank you for sharting that! [In reply to] Can't Post

As you can see from that thread, I revisited the subject earlier this year (almost 20 years later), and I have been thinking a lot about the subject. In particular, I have been thinking about how Orcs fit into the interaction of Fate and Free Will in Tolkien's legendarium. There has been a considerable amount of reconsideration of Tolkien's Orcs, particularly by Robert Tally, beginning with his 2010 paper "Let Us Now Praise Famous Orcs: Simple Humanity in Tolkien's Inhuman Creatures" and culminating in his book last year The Mismeasure of Orcs: A Critical Reassessment of Tolkien's Demonized Creatures. And there has been a lot of discussion by various different Tolkien scholars (most prominently Verlyn Flieger), about the roles of Fate and Free Will in Tolkien's legendarium. But I am not aware of any works that connects the two, discussing how the role of the Orcs illuminates how the Marring of Arda by Melkor impacts the complicated interaction of Fate and Free Will.

That might have to change.

'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'

The Hall of Fire


noWizardme
Half-elven


Wed, 8:46pm

Post #10 of 30 (94 views)
Shortcut
I did like your suggestion! [In reply to] Can't Post

One reason among many was that (aside from a facsimile of free will rather than the real thing being maybe the most that Melkor could do), it fits nicely with WH Auden's observation:

Quote
...the kind of evil which Sauron embodies, the lust for domination, will always be irrationally cruel, for such a lust is not satisfied unless others not only obey but obey against their will.
Auden, W. H. (1967) "Good and Evil in The Lord of the Rings," Tolkien Journal: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 1.



Which sounds right, and leads me to think that Sauron might be very happy with (or even prefer) orcs who could wish for freedom but never actually have it to mere 'dumb beasts'.

~~~~~~
"I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.


Voronwë_the_Faithful
Valinor

Wed, 8:54pm

Post #11 of 30 (85 views)
Shortcut
I'd not seen that piece before [In reply to] Can't Post

Thank you very much for sharing it!

'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'

The Hall of Fire


CuriousG
Half-elven


Thu, 2:35am

Post #12 of 30 (65 views)
Shortcut
That Auden line gives me shivers. Seriously. But how true. // [In reply to] Can't Post

 


noWizardme
Half-elven


Thu, 1:10pm

Post #13 of 30 (61 views)
Shortcut
Yes, Auden is absolutely right [In reply to] Can't Post

In the Primary world, there are so many examples of an underclass who've been treated with far more cruelty than would seem to meet the tyrant's or overclass' selfish best interests (let aside whether the means of cruelty is ever justified to achieve some end).
So many historical situations, and so many current affairs ones could be used as examples.
Personally, I conclude that if cruelty or sadism is allowed or encouraged anywhere, it won't be too hard to find enough sadists. But also there is "The Cruelty Is The Point (in which a group finds community by rejoicing in the suffering of those they hate and fear). And, often, the immoral (and in the end self-defeating) idea that if cruelty is sufficiently frequent, and spectacular it will keep the [insert the context-appropriate slur word]s in line. I call that self-defeating because when there is a rebellion eventually, there will be a lot of thirst for revenge. Though of course the prospect of that can play into the hands of those who want to use the spectre of everyone hacked to death in their beds if the revolution comes to double down on the oppression...

But back to Middle-earth!
I'm still enjoying thinking about the consequences of imagining that Voronwë_the_Faithful's idea is right. If that's right then Melkor or Sauron can enjoy a kind of cruelty they couldn't visit on 'dumb beasts' who can't feel the lack of being free (as I said previously).
But, additionally, despite some amusing orc-talk about desertion or rebellion, no Orcish Sparticus or Wat Tyler or Toussaint L'Ouverture, or Sebastián Lemba or John Brown or Che Guevara or Malcolm X or Mahatma Gandi or any other leader able to organise violent or non-violent rebellion could ever possibly emerge. Doubly delicious for a Dark Lord, or so I would imagine! Smile

Of course, an additional safeguard is the orcish culture of fighting each other at the drop of a hat - though that backfires from Sauron's POV, with the clash of orcs at the Tower of Cirith Ungol enabling Sam and Frodo to penetrate the Mordor Border.

~~~~~~
"I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.


noWizardme
Half-elven


Thu, 1:19pm

Post #14 of 30 (59 views)
Shortcut
Well, they're canonical, I suppose [In reply to] Can't Post

For myself, I think ogres are a passing reference. As far as I know (which maybe is not very far) Tolkien wrote no account or description of them. So I'm not sure I can answer the question directly.

But it did strike me that maybe there is an interesting bit of fanthropology here.

Because Tolkien does mention ogres, one might say that they canonically exist in Middle-earth - either as a kind of creature that really does exist, or at least a kind of creature known to Bilbo from hobbit tales, however garbled, mixed up or otherwise unfactual those tales might be.

But where does that leave us?

~~~~~~
"I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.


Otaku-sempai
Immortal


Thu, 1:51pm

Post #15 of 30 (59 views)
Shortcut
Where does that leave us? [In reply to] Can't Post

That would seem to leave us right back at the beginning, I suppose.Ogres might be real in Middle-earth or they might be the products of folklore, rumor and exaggeration.

“Hell hath no fury like that of the uninvolved.” - Jenny Blake Isabella


CuriousG
Half-elven


Thu, 5:00pm

Post #16 of 30 (50 views)
Shortcut
Dumb beasts vs miserable slaves [In reply to] Can't Post

I suppose if mere ownership and being the boss were enough for a sadistic leader, they'd get a herd of sheep and be content, and then make sure their herd was bigger than all the others. But I suspect the real prize, their psyche whispers to them in the dark, is to subjugate your fellow wo/man and then make them miserable, and then you get the gold medal instead of a lousy bronze.

I'd think that Gandalf's description of Sauron to Frodo in Bag End ought to be repellent to people, but instead Saruman and his ilk are attracted to him as "powerful" and bringing order. Pointing back to Auden:

Quote
He does not need you – he has many more useful servants – but he won’t forget you again. And hobbits as miserable slaves would please him far more than hobbits happy and free. There is such a thing as malice and revenge.’



Maciliel
Valinor


Thu, 6:54pm

Post #17 of 30 (39 views)
Shortcut
boy this auden fellow seems quite insightful [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
One reason among many was that (aside from a facsimile of free will rather than the real thing being maybe the most that Melkor could do), it fits nicely with WH Auden's observation:

Quote
...the kind of evil which Sauron embodies, the lust for domination, will always be irrationally cruel, for such a lust is not satisfied unless others not only obey but obey against their will.
Auden, W. H. (1967) "Good and Evil in The Lord of the Rings," Tolkien Journal: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 1.



Which sounds right, and leads me to think that Sauron might be very happy with (or even prefer) orcs who could wish for freedom but never actually have it to mere 'dumb beasts'.



boy this auden fellow seems quite insightful.

they way tolkien talks about (and auden comments on) this aspect of tokien's characters makes me think of psychopathy (and sadism) and malignant narcissim.

psychopathy is the older but more widely known term; anti-social personality disorder is how psychiatry now refers to it. i will use the term psychopathy.

it's a sliding scale, not a binary (so it's not a "you are / you're not," but more of a "how high do you score"?). there is an actual scoring method devised by robert hare, who did extensive research with extremely disturbed people.

(extreme) psychopaths aren't crazy. they understand the rules of society. they just don't feel those rules should apply to them. (extreme) psychopaths have emotions, but they don't necessarily have all the emotions that we do, or feel them in the same way. they are certainly deficit in empathy. other people are tools to be used. other people are crops to be harvested.

they get off on control. a great demonstration of control is to do bad things and be able to get away with it. to hurt people and get away with it. to see someone suffer, and hear them beg, acquiesce, plead.

even if tolkien isn't using the word psychopathy, even if he wasn't even thinking about it, i think he's describing it. melkor displays a lot of the attributes.

1. wanting to be praised before all others (jealous of manwe)

2. jealous of the creations of others and any praise earned by those creations (the trees of yavanna)

3. extreme need for control

4. cruelty

5. delight in destruction (his wars, the killing of the trees, despoiling elves and maia)


and extreme psychopaths attract extreme psychopaths. they admire and understand each other. but any alliance has an expiration date, because they can't help being jealous of one another, they can't help betraying one another.

just because one is a psychopath doesn't mean one is particularly intelligent. but for those who are, they are very good at cunning assessment. being able to evaluate people and identify their needs, what motivates them, how they can be manipulated. they are often charismatic and good mimicers of social behaviors.

in real life, a compelling example would be sante and kevin kimes (mother and son grifters and multiple murderers). if you want to see an example of how a psychopath mimics normal human behavior, take a look at the interview kevin kimes did in prison with the (female) journalist he attacked and held hostage. there's a point in the videotaped interview where he smiles -- it looks like he's aware that the rhythm of the conversation expects him to smile... he understands the social dynamics -- but the actual smile he produces doesn't really look like a normal human smile. moments later, he attacks the journalist and takes her hostage.

i am now thinking of melkor as a psychopath. the depths of his evil mindset is really ungraspable by those who are at the opposite end of the spectrum (low or no psychopathy). maybe we should ask hare to do an assessment.

but it also makes me think of how we can (and need to) combat psychopathy.


cheers --

.


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo


Maciliel
Valinor


Thu, 7:06pm

Post #18 of 30 (39 views)
Shortcut
this seems quite in alignment with a psychopath's outlook [In reply to] Can't Post

 
this seems quite in alignment with a psychopath's outlook.

while having dumb slaves is certainly a plus, it pales in comparison to having slaves that actually want to be free. i suppose if orcs did manage some sort of rebellion, after it was dealt with by melkor he would delight in the opportunity to punish. it would actually be a treat for him, and a bit sweeter than just inflicting harm upon them before the rebellion.


cheers --

.


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo


noWizardme
Half-elven


Thu, 7:26pm

Post #19 of 30 (36 views)
Shortcut
I'll need to make a hasty reply [In reply to] Can't Post

...don't tell anyone or I'll be kicked out of Ent School!
I completely agree about these personality disorders being one good way to think about a tendency to Darklordism.
There's a school of Tolkien criticism (Prof Tom Shippey, that I find persuasive which proposes that, although Middle-earth is not an allegory of the Primary world, Tolkien was not some mental refugee from the Twentieth Century, and can, in fact be best understood as one of a group of authors processing the collapse of Edwardian verities in the mincer of the First World War trenches, and then the rise of aggressive authoritarianism regimes (Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao...) and further wars and emergencies. Plenty of Dark Lord equivalents to think about in their Primary World (though we too are not lacking examples).

There's some fun stuff about Tolkien and WH Auden. Tolkien starts out by calling Auden 'a corduroy panzer' (though not to his face, but in Letter 83, to Christopher Tolkien). Interesting to find out that the 1930s culture war was just as stupid and tedious (and as able to make intelligent people sound and act stupid and tedious) as more contemporary ones. But Auden was an early champion of Tolkien's work and the two became friends. I find I put what I know about this in an earlier post here - scroll down past the item on Orwell's Notes On Nationalism to get to Auden.
...and now I must away to supper (maybe I'm mote hobbit than ent after all) Smile

~~~~~~
"I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.


Maciliel
Valinor


Thu, 7:41pm

Post #20 of 30 (36 views)
Shortcut
your hasty reply will be kept secret and safe with me : ) [In reply to] Can't Post

 
nowiz, thank you for bringing all of this to the discussion. it makes sense that any culture witnessing its disintegration and the rise of war, slaughter, and despotism would have despairing moments and look to answer why.

the question of "what is evil?" is a pretty profound one, and one that seems to have been with us for tens of thousands of years.

i'll check out your earlier post (thank you for unearthing it, and providing it).

cheers --

.


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo


Maciliel
Valinor


Thu, 7:46pm

Post #21 of 30 (38 views)
Shortcut
one clarification re psychopathy [In reply to] Can't Post

 
one clarification with psychopathy...

i had meant to write that a psychopath's delight in getting away with it can be multifold.

1. does something no one else knows about and gets away with it -- glee and satisfaction

2. does something only a few people know about and gets away with it -- glee and satisfaction, plus someone else can attest to how clever / strong / etc. the psychopath is (whether that's a victim or a co-conspiritor)

3. does something that everyone knows about and gets away with it -- glee and satisfaction to the utmost. it's an absolute demonstration of power ("i did this -- you know it, i know it, i'm bragging about it, and you can't touch me"). any discomfort and pain in others is icing on the cake.


cheers --

.


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo


Maciliel
Valinor


11:44am

Post #22 of 30 (28 views)
Shortcut
corrupted maiar [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
At least that's the conclusion I drew from reading all the various texts. Probably, if corrupted Maiar were used by Melkor to breed orcs and trolls, then tales of giant orcs and trolls that occasionally appear in the HoME series of texts, are probably their offspring.



that's definitely a reasonable hypothesis. that life essence was certainly a useful font from which melkor could draw.

it's making me think... do maiar have fear (souls) the way the edain and elves do? if so, are they the same? is the fea of an edeain the same as the fea of an elf? their hroar certainly are not the same.



cheers --

.


aka. fili orc-enshield
+++++++++++++++++++
the scene, as i understand it, is exceptionally well-written. fili (in sort of a callback to the scene with the eagles), calls out "thorRIIIIIIN!!!" just as he sees the pale orc veer in for the kill. he picks up the severed arm of an orc which is lying on the ground, swings it up in desperation, effectively blocking the pale orc's blow. and thus, forever after, fili is known as "fili orc-enshield."

this earns him deep respect from his hard-to-please uncle. as well as a hug. kili wipes his boots on the pale orc's glory box. -- maciliel telpemairo

(This post was edited by Maciliel on 11:55am)


Voronwë_the_Faithful
Valinor

2:13pm

Post #23 of 30 (26 views)
Shortcut
Maiar do not exactly have fëa the way that Elves and Men do [In reply to] Can't Post

Here is what Tolkien says about the subject in an essay aptly titled "Spirit" published in The Nature of Middle-earth (and also published in slightly different form in Parma Eldalamberon 17 in 2007),


Quote
Eldar did not confound ordinary “breath” of the lungs with “spirit”. The particular spirit indwelling in a body they called fëa [*fáya;]; spirit in general as a kind of being they called fairë. These terms were chiefly applied to the spirits or “souls” of Elves (and Men); since though these were held to be of a similar sort to those of the máyar (and Valar), they were not identical in nature: it was part of the nature of a fëa to desire to dwell in a body (hrondo), and by that mediary or instrument to operate upon the physical world; and the fëa did not and could not make its own body, according to its desire, or conception of itself, but could only modify its given or appointed hrondo by indwelling (as a living person may modify a house, filling it with a sense of his own personality, even if no visible physical alterations are made in its shape).

But the Eldar held that “spirits”, the more as they had more native inherent power, could emit their influence to make contact with or act upon things exterior to themselves: primarily upon other spirits, or other incarnate persons (via their fëar), but also in the case of great spirits (such as the Valar or greater máyar) directly upon physical things without the mediacy of bodies normally necessary in the case of “fairondi” or incarnates.


'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.'

The Hall of Fire

(This post was edited by Voronwë_the_Faithful on 2:15pm)


noWizardme
Half-elven


4:10pm

Post #24 of 30 (21 views)
Shortcut
Or... [In reply to] Can't Post

I think the third option is that it's just some wording that Tolkien used to express, to his primary world readers, the sort of thing Bilbo was feeling. Possibly Tolkien would be somewhat surprised at anyone taking that casual reference seriously.


Tolkien wasn't always as careful in TH with using language so as to keep Middle-earth free of anachronisms from the Primary world. So for myself, I don't seriously think there are bicycling policemen or express trains in Middle-earth (though the train is a description of Gandalf's fireworks in A Long Expected Party, so not in TH).
For a fourth option, I see Tolkien Gateway says:

Quote
Ogres were used by J.R.R. Tolkien in early drafts of the legendarium as a name for one of the monsters bred by Melkor along with Gongs and the other Úvanimor
[reference cites Book Of Lost Tales]


So I suppose you could also take TH to be the only published reference to whatever ogres were like back then.

How about were-worms (Hapax legomenon)?:


Quote
Tell me what you want done, and I will try it, if I have to walk from here to the East of East and fight the wild Were-worms in the Last Desert.
Bilbo Baggins speaking, in The Hobbit, Ch1: An Unexpected Party


And that is the only reference to these creatures, who (like ogres) then presumably really exist in Middle-earth, are a bit of hobbit folklore, or are Tolkien having some alliterative fun in the text and not for a moment intending it to go any further.

Were worms have, I see, been included in various adaptations. Where I suppose they do certainly exist for the purposes of that particular card game, movie etc.; but that might not be anything to do with Tolkien, really.

~~~~~~
"I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.

(This post was edited by noWizardme on 4:11pm)


CuriousG
Half-elven


4:50pm

Post #25 of 30 (16 views)
Shortcut
Spirits [In reply to] Can't Post

Thanks for providing that distinction. I'd always assumed 1 spirit = 1 spirit, but clearly not, I suppose as the Ainur's spirits originated with Eru and sang in the great Music, while the Elves/Men came later and were, let's face it, a bit bargain-basement.

RE:

Quote
But the Eldar held that “spirits”, the more as they had more native inherent power, could emit their influence to make contact with or act upon things exterior to themselves: primarily upon other spirits, or other incarnate persons (via their fëar), but also in the case of great spirits (such as the Valar or greater máyar) directly upon physical things without the mediacy of bodies normally necessary in the case of “fairondi” or incarnates.


That reminds me of certain parts of the Silmarillion/Valaquenta that sound so charming and delightfully magical:


Quote
In reverence Yavanna is next to Varda among the Queens of the Valar. In the form of a woman she is tall, and robed in green; but at times she takes other shapes. Some there are who have seen her standing like a tree under heaven, crowned with the Sun; and from all its branches there spilled a golden dew upon the barren earth, and it grew green with corn; but the roots of the tree were in the waters of Ulmo, and the winds of Manwë spoke in its leaves.



Quote
But of Olórin that tale does not speak; for though he loved the Elves, he walked among them unseen, or in form as one of them, and they did not know whence came the fair visions or the promptings of wisdom that he put into their hearts.


We need more Olórins in the world; fewer Melkor-psychopaths.

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.