Our Sponsor Sideshow Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Lord of The Rings:
(If) A remastered LOTR is made, what will we see?
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Patty
Elvenhome


Aug 15 2012, 4:25pm

Post #26 of 59 (1301 views)
Shortcut
Ta, JW !/ [In reply to] Can't Post

 

Permanent address: Into the West






Kendalf
Nargothrond

Aug 15 2012, 7:11pm

Post #27 of 59 (1351 views)
Shortcut
Three different categories of revision? [In reply to] Can't Post

Purely aesthetic changes
I can see this sort of tweaking happening for the Ultimate Pentalogy Box Set in 2015, particularly as Jackson is such a huge fan of the technology of movie-making. Personally, I'd be happy to see:
1) A uniform look for Gollum throughout the entirity of all five films (save the slightly "younger" look they claim they have in TH)
2) Improved CGI (quality not quantity - no extra trolls and oliphaunts, please) to match the standard in TH
3) Freeman replacing Holm as Bilbo in the prologue to FotR (an exact replica of the original shot, please - which, actually, I hope features in this Christmas's AUJ)
4) A uniform colour-palette across all five films (the new colouring for FotR clashes badly with TT and RotK at the minute...and don't get me started on the tint again Crazy )

Additional voice-overs
I'm a little reluctant to support the inclusion of new material as it veers too closely towards revisionism this many years after the event and that has a justifiably bad name. Still, with some old cutting room footage from the original shoot (if even necessary), some extra lines of voice-over could be added with minimum effort to enrich the tapestry a little:
1) Perhaps Gandalf could make a reference to Sauron's rout from Dol Guldur (whilst in Bag End's kitchen?)
2) Perhaps he could also make a little more of the fact that it is Balin's tomb and that that is Ori's skeleton he's just plucked the book from
3) Perhaps he could also mention that news has reached him of Dain's last stand in the north (whilst on the Minas Tirith balcony?) or Frodo could do it (as we fly back over the map to Hobbiton?)

New footage
As I said above, I'm not a major fan of this and not just for ethical reasons; the films are long (and occasionally cumbersome) enough as they are (particularly RotK) and I suspect the standard of make-up, the quality of the image, the aesthetic of the costumes, the age of the stars etc would jar quite badly if 2012 material were inserted into a 2001 film. Still, if it had to happen:
1) A battle-montage of Dain and the War in the North

And although there very little support for it (from what I can tell), I think we're going to see a 3D LotR whether we want it or not. "Ultimate Middle-earth Pentalogy! Available in 3D!"


Patty
Elvenhome


Aug 16 2012, 11:14am

Post #28 of 59 (1315 views)
Shortcut
3D... [In reply to] Can't Post

We just treated ourselves to a 3D TV for our celebration of 25 years in our little home. It does do 2D to 3D conversion (simulation) and I'm planning to have a marathon of LotR just prior to The Hobbit's release, but I'm not sure if I'll do this conversion or not. And I'm thinking I may have to watch the DVD instead of the Blu-ray of FotR, or I'll be angry.

If a 3d conversion of LotR becomes available (done in a professional way) with a fixed FotR coloring I'll have to have it. I figure--I don't smoke and only drink occasionally and I'm only an infrequent shopper-- I deserve the vice of trying to get Middle-earth at its best, no matter how often I have to replace it. But once more is enough--heck, I didn't even buy the Limited Edition, that had both the theatrical and the extended in one set. I adore 3D--I'm blessed that it doesn't give me a headache, and I'll not be better able to immerse myself in the films in my lifetime (outside of the books, of course.)

Permanent address: Into the West






Kendalf
Nargothrond

Aug 17 2012, 10:29am

Post #29 of 59 (1261 views)
Shortcut
I'm a big fan, too [In reply to] Can't Post

I love 3D, too, when it's done properly and am itching to upgrade my TV in my home-cinema (ie converted garage!) but I'm holding off until The Hobbit 3D blu-rays come out (with the accompanying LotR conversions, of course!)...

Lurker in the Dark (and others) further up the thread are right, though: the converted LotR will never quite achieve the depth of immersion of, say, Avatar and, hopefully, The Hobbit as it wasn't shot with 3D in mind. I'd love to hear what impact your TV's "simulation" of 3D has on your viewing experience when you get around to it. Smile


Patty
Elvenhome


Aug 17 2012, 10:38am

Post #30 of 59 (1283 views)
Shortcut
I'm just learning this TV... [In reply to] Can't Post

it's a "smart" TV, and I'm not "smart".

I've been having a discussion with someone on the desire for "eye-popping visuals" as opposed to only a sense of depth. It depends on the movie, of course. I just watched the Grand Canyon, River at Risk disc, and the way the drops of water came out at you is a pretty awesome experience. I think something akin to that would be distracting in The Hobbit, though it would turn the theater experience into just that--an experience--instead of just a movie, if I'm making myself clear. I'm not sure what I prefer with this movie--I want it to seem like 3 movies of the 6 movie story, and it could never do that with those kinds of visuals, but they are fun to experience.

Permanent address: Into the West






Istaris'staffs
Ossiriand


Aug 17 2012, 6:35pm

Post #31 of 59 (1282 views)
Shortcut
EEE's [In reply to] Can't Post

--Green Tint
--Correct Gollum in Fellowship
--Replacing Ian Holm with Martin Freeman in the Prologue
--Enhanced CGI effects. (Some of the scenes, especially in the Extended versions, look kind of rough in 1080p)
--3D
--Perhaps adding even more deleted scenes.

I don't see him creating new scenes.


DanielLB
Elvenhome


Aug 17 2012, 6:41pm

Post #32 of 59 (1265 views)
Shortcut
Well ... technically they have already created new scenes [In reply to] Can't Post

Old Bilbo and Frodo can slot straight into The Fellowship of the Ring Wink


Kendalf
Nargothrond

Aug 17 2012, 10:10pm

Post #33 of 59 (1264 views)
Shortcut
Yep, subtlety is needed... [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I've been having a discussion with someone on the desire for "eye-popping visuals" as opposed to only a sense of depth. It depends on the movie, of course. I just watched the Grand Canyon, River at Risk disc, and the way the drops of water came out at you is a pretty awesome experience. I think something akin to that would be distracting in The Hobbit...

Agreed. I really, really, really, really don't think we need goblin arrows flying at us!! If, instead, the three dimensions are used to, say, transport us through Bag End, through the gates of Rivendell, through the goblin tunnels, through the trees of Mirkwood* then I'll be much, much happier. I remember just how enveloped (and thereby transported) I felt by Pandora's luminescent forest in Cameron's Avatar. That is what 3D is for!!! *I'll stop with Film One or the list will go on too long!


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 18 2012, 6:19am

Post #34 of 59 (1233 views)
Shortcut
I hope watching the Hobbit [In reply to] Can't Post

Is nothing like the Avatar experience. I am not interested in walking through a Hobbit-themed screensaver.


DanielLB
Elvenhome


Aug 18 2012, 7:44am

Post #35 of 59 (1250 views)
Shortcut
I hope it is [In reply to] Can't Post

Avatar in 3D blew my mind away. Since then, every 3D film has been disappointing. I'm hoping that the 3D for The Hobbit is better than Avatar.


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 18 2012, 3:37pm

Post #36 of 59 (1219 views)
Shortcut
Likewise [In reply to] Can't Post

In the way that a really cool screensaver blows my mind. Smile


Patty
Elvenhome


Aug 18 2012, 3:45pm

Post #37 of 59 (1261 views)
Shortcut
on the 2D to 3D conversion... [In reply to] Can't Post

I just watched The Fifth Element with the 3D conversion. Or, I should say, I watched the first 15 -20 minutes of it that way. This is one of my all time favorite flicks, so I stopped after I'd just plain had enough.

I chose that movie, because there are so many places where you can tell it should have been filmed in 3D. A child pokes his finger out at the screen, guns are pointed at the screen, etc. etc. It would have been awesome if it had been filmed that way, but there is a huge amount of "ghosting" and very little depth. It could be my set doesn't do it well, or it could be the disc doesn't after all lend itself to that, or the player--I don't know. I haven't watched cable in 2D to 3D yet--I'll report on that later.

I have been using info from this guy on Amazon--a self professed 3D connoisseur to decide if I want to buy my first discs or not:


http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A11MGPEYU3VO1U/ref=cm_pdp_rev_more?ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview#R1O6JTF9PNYUXL

He talks about oos (out of screen effects) etc. I love those, but as I say, I don't know that I want to see that in The Hobbit. I think we'll have to trust PJ not to go too far in this direction. It really might begin to feel like a video game. Avatar won't be out on disc to those of us who didn't buy Panasonic gear until sometime in October. That will be the test of how well my set works, cause it was awesome at the theater.

Permanent address: Into the West






DanielLB
Elvenhome


Aug 18 2012, 3:46pm

Post #38 of 59 (1211 views)
Shortcut
Oh Shelob'sAppetite! [In reply to] Can't Post

Spoil sport Tongue


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 18 2012, 4:16pm

Post #39 of 59 (1210 views)
Shortcut
But [In reply to] Can't Post

I compared Avatar to a really cool screensaver!

Isn't that a positive statement? Smile


DanielLB
Elvenhome


Aug 18 2012, 4:25pm

Post #40 of 59 (1206 views)
Shortcut
It's positive ... [In reply to] Can't Post

But not positive enough Wink

I hope the films are better than a really cool screensaver!


Kassandros
Nargothrond


Aug 18 2012, 4:25pm

Post #41 of 59 (1249 views)
Shortcut
My expectations for Avatar's story were so low that I was pleasantly surprised [In reply to] Can't Post

I went to watch it purely for the special effects. And the special effects blew me away - I felt like I had been transported into the future to see what movies will be like.

The story was better than I expected. Yeah, very simple and lots of cheese, but the story of the guy going back and forth between his avatar body and his crippled one was actually pretty good, I thought. The scenes of him transitioning back to his real body were moving. And the the transition into thinking the avatar body was his body more than the real one.

I think a really great movie could have been made of it with some changes. I also would have cut it into and let it breathe more, ending with the felling of the tree. As is, I still quite liked it though.

all we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us...


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 18 2012, 4:48pm

Post #42 of 59 (1223 views)
Shortcut
I once had a screensaver [In reply to] Can't Post

That really engaged me for a few minutes. It was brightly-colored and interactive, and fun to play around with while I waited for my plane to start boarding.

That's how I feel about Avatar. Smile


Kendalf
Nargothrond

Aug 19 2012, 11:05pm

Post #43 of 59 (1220 views)
Shortcut
Sorry, SA, but I have to disagree! [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
(I hope watching The Hobbit) Is nothing like the Avatar experience. I am not interested in walking through a Hobbit-themed screensaver.



Avatar's art design may not have been to your own particular, personal taste. Indeed, its character development, narrative direction and thematic overtones may not have impressed you either.

But the overwhelming technological achievement of the film cannot be denied (save by the willfully contrary) and it is that which I am hoping is matched and, indeed, supassed by An Unexpected Journey this Christmas.

Three or four years down the line from Cameron's ground-breaking work on Pandora, I am immensely excited to see what Jackson can do with the format in Middle-earth...


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 19 2012, 11:07pm

Post #44 of 59 (1260 views)
Shortcut
I'm not denying that in terms of computer graphics, it was an achievement [In reply to] Can't Post

I am just saying that artistically, I found it very much lacking.


Kendalf
Nargothrond

Aug 19 2012, 11:12pm

Post #45 of 59 (1196 views)
Shortcut
Ha! [In reply to] Can't Post

...then we're prettty much agreed, then!


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 20 2012, 5:48am

Post #46 of 59 (1253 views)
Shortcut
Astounding, isn't it? [In reply to] Can't Post

Smile

Pigs flying past your window?


Spaldron
Ossiriand


Aug 20 2012, 4:46pm

Post #47 of 59 (1203 views)
Shortcut
Do people still believe the "green tint" myth? [In reply to] Can't Post

I'm sorry but there is no such thing as a green tint the the EE's. The only ones who seem to see a green tint are those who haven't properly calibrated their TV's and are still using the factory settings. My set is fully calibrated and FOTR looks astounding and with not a tint of green to be found.

This is a great thread for properly fixing your TV's image quality (and removing that green tint forever).

"A single dream is more powerful than a thousand realities."


Shelob'sAppetite
Doriath

Aug 20 2012, 5:48pm

Post #48 of 59 (1212 views)
Shortcut
Really? [In reply to] Can't Post

It is almost certainly NOT a myth. There is a green tint.


Spaldron
Ossiriand


Aug 21 2012, 1:20am

Post #49 of 59 (1260 views)
Shortcut
Its only not a myth... [In reply to] Can't Post

.... if you can see the green tint, in which case the chances are your TV isn't calibrated properly. There are people I have spoken to who have much more AV knowledge than I have and they assure me that this is merely an issue with some sets and dodgy calibration. Like I said my set is calibrated and there is no green tint at all, it looks perfect.

Remember these weren't just some shoddy studio approved transfers (like the TE blu-rays). Do you really think Jackson, who personally oversaw the transfers to blu-ray (from the original 2K masters no less) would just deliberately miss such an obvious colouration error?

"A single dream is more powerful than a thousand realities."


DanielLB
Elvenhome


Aug 21 2012, 7:12am

Post #50 of 59 (1165 views)
Shortcut
Why is it only on FOTR then? [In reply to] Can't Post

Wouldn't all 3 have the same problem? Crazy

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.