|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DjU
Lorien
Sep 12 2013, 11:20pm
Post #1 of 39
(3060 views)
Shortcut
|
|
AUJ EE - Appendices feature running lengths
|
Can't Post
|
|
In the past day BBFC has start to rate the component parts of the AUJ EE. So we are starting to get an idea on the running lengths of the individual features.
I'm gonna have look and cross reference them with the list.
http://www.bbfc.co.uk/...ype_of_media_tid=All
|
|
|
DjU
Lorien
Sep 12 2013, 11:55pm
Post #2 of 39
(2574 views)
Shortcut
|
Note:- they only seem to have got through Appendices 7 but so far they total well over 255 minutes (4hrs 15mins plus) so its easy to see why the DVD version of Appendices 7 needs to be split across 2 discs
The Appendices Part 7: A Long-Expected Journey - A 14-part chronological history of the filming of An Unexpected Journey, covering pre-production in the various departments of the film in the months leading up to the start of principal photography, the boot camp training for the main cast, and the work done on set chronologically through the three shooting blocks and in the world of its digital effects. Chapters include:
Introduction by Peter Jackson = 1m 48s
The Journey Back to Middle-Earth - 46m 12s
Riddles in the Dark: Gollum's Cave - 16m 16s
An Unexpected Party: Bag End - 24m 17s
Roast Mutton: Trollshaws Forest - 16m 27s
Bastion of the Greenwood: Rhosgobel - 10m 7s
A Short Rest: Rivendell and London - 27m 52s
Over Hill: The Misty Mountains - 13m 4s
Under Hill: Goblin Town - 18m 19s
Out of the Frying Pan: The Forest Ledge - 15m 20s
Return to Hobbiton: The Shire - 17m 40s
The Epic of Scene 88: Strath Taieri - 8m 5s
The Battle of Moria: Azanulbizar - 10m 21s
Edge of the Wilderland: Pick-ups and the Carrock - 21m 38s
Home Is Behind, the World Is Ahead - 11m 9s
Credits = 3m 34s
|
|
|
Mooseboy018
Grey Havens
Sep 13 2013, 12:46am
Post #3 of 39
(2155 views)
Shortcut
|
I'm still disappointed by the format though. I preferred the way the Lord of the Rings ones were set up.
|
|
|
Silmaril
Rohan
Sep 13 2013, 6:44am
Post #5 of 39
(2006 views)
Shortcut
|
looking forward to see this! i love that stuff!
|
|
|
Carne
Tol Eressea
Sep 13 2013, 7:02am
Post #6 of 39
(2029 views)
Shortcut
|
Heck, even the 10 minute or so vlogs cover quite a lot, so watching these is going to be a joy!
|
|
|
Bexlin
Rivendell
Sep 13 2013, 10:04am
Post #8 of 39
(1997 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Audio Commentary - Mikael Persbrandt???
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Why would he be listed?
|
|
|
arithmancer
Grey Havens
Sep 13 2013, 12:23pm
Post #9 of 39
(1908 views)
Shortcut
|
Very old information, from the two-film split days.
|
|
|
AncalagontheBlack
Rohan
Sep 13 2013, 12:40pm
Post #10 of 39
(1905 views)
Shortcut
|
I think Graham MacTavish said there was 15 hours of behind the scenes material.
|
|
|
redgiraffe
Rohan
Sep 14 2013, 6:13am
Post #12 of 39
(1703 views)
Shortcut
|
The 182 minutes of movie leaves 460 mins (7.6 hrs) for special features.
If the actual film is 182 minutes then that should mean 17 minutes of extra movie rather than the previously stated 13 minutes. Is that right?
-Sir are you classified as human
-Negative, I am a meat-popsicle
|
|
|
redgiraffe
Rohan
Sep 14 2013, 10:10am
Post #14 of 39
(1669 views)
Shortcut
|
If you have a digital or DVD copy of AUJ you can see that the full running time, including credits, is 2:49:37 = 169+ minutes, so adding 13 minutes gives you 182 minutes.
Thanks a lot for destroying all of my hopes and dreams. I shall remember this forever!!
-Sir are you classified as human
-Negative, I am a meat-popsicle
|
|
|
painjoiker
Grey Havens
Sep 14 2013, 10:28am
Post #15 of 39
(1657 views)
Shortcut
|
Isn't it better having them destroyed now than when you put the disc in and expect 17 minutes and get 13?
Vocalist in the progressive metal band 5 Minutes Late
and the progressive doom rock band Mater Thallium
(This post was edited by painjoiker on Sep 14 2013, 10:29am)
|
|
|
Fleuz
Lorien
Sep 14 2013, 10:46am
Post #16 of 39
(1656 views)
Shortcut
|
|
German Rating FSK says different
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
http://www.areadvd.de/news/der-hobbit-extended-edition-wird-1531-minuten-langer-auf-blu-ray-disc/
According to them it΄s gonna be 15 minutes and 31 seconds longer than the TC.
|
|
|
burgahobbit
Rohan
Sep 14 2013, 4:25pm
Post #17 of 39
(1624 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Watch your tongue Mr. Baggins!
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Language has gone way up! I'm still hoping the whole nudity thing is nothing much (maybe a dwarf half-moon or something)...but the language is now up with the violence and themes! What is Gollum going to cuss up and down the Misty Mountains that his beepin' precious is lost. Will the Goblin-king sing some modern day rock hits with all curse words included? Seriously, what the heck!  I know a lot of you think I'm over reacting, but this is supposed to be a family movie. Lots of people (who don't want to see and hear any garbage) will buy this without looking at the ratings because all seven previous middle-earth dvd releases were completely clean as far as that stuff goes (theatricals and extended making up the seven).
Ian Mckellen: "If we just had made one movie of The Hobbit, the fact is that all the fans, and I'm thinking of the eight, nine, ten-year-old boys ... Well, they've now got three films they can watch 1,000 times."...ummmmmm.
(This post was edited by burgahobbit on Sep 14 2013, 4:25pm)
|
|
|
morro91
Bree
Sep 14 2013, 4:55pm
Post #18 of 39
(1603 views)
Shortcut
|
I think somewhere in an interview there was something (probably said jokingly though) about Dwarvish swearing, so maybe subtitled course language!!
Remember that just one bad word would send the rating up, so its probably not a big deal. I doubt theres suddenly swearing everywhere
|
|
|
Fleuz
Lorien
Sep 14 2013, 5:39pm
Post #19 of 39
(1589 views)
Shortcut
|
The Graphic says "Moderate Impact".
So it will not be that hard.
|
|
|
Cirashala
Valinor
Sep 14 2013, 8:47pm
Post #20 of 39
(1564 views)
Shortcut
|
I think the language might refer to the appendices and extras- where an actor cusses when he messes up, for example...
If it refers to the movie, then I will have a little more concern, but for all we know it could be Khuzdul cuss words....in which case it might honestly be more funny than anything if teenage boys start saying Mahalu-me-turg! In the hallway at school- might confuse people more than anything 
All kidding aside, it is probably for the appendices more than the film, because I do not see PJ&co putting modern day swear words in the dialogue of the film (of course, I have a sneaky suspicion that Bilbo was swearing up and down in his head after hearing that, after all his trouble, snot, and hard work the stupid ponies ran off anyway-ungrateful little twerps ) lol
Race is meaningless. We all bleed red-no matter who or what we are. What matters is the heart. For each race has those with good hearts and those with bad hearts. You have a good heart. You do not deserve to die.
(This post was edited by Cirashala on Sep 14 2013, 8:48pm)
|
|
|
Cirashala
Valinor
Sep 14 2013, 8:52pm
Post #21 of 39
(1564 views)
Shortcut
|
The rating I am more concerned about is the sex one- what?????? 
They separate sex and nudity as two separate categories, so what the heck are they talking about with sex?????
I dearly hope this is just innuendos spoken during the appendices, because if it is actually in the movie itself, my daughter probably won't be watching it!
Of course, I will fast forward the spider scene at home....because she's afraid of spiders....oh, wait-that's me.... 
Race is meaningless. We all bleed red-no matter who or what we are. What matters is the heart. For each race has those with good hearts and those with bad hearts. You have a good heart. You do not deserve to die.
|
|
|
burgahobbit
Rohan
Sep 15 2013, 12:45am
Post #22 of 39
(1538 views)
Shortcut
|
But do these ratings usually include bonus material? I know the MPAA ones don't. That being the case, I'm worried that they've made "The Hobbit" into an inappropriate film only for adults, which is horrible because kids have been the primary targets for this film so far and they will watch it without their parents ever suspecting. I sincerely hope that I'm wrong, but things don't look good.
(This post was edited by burgahobbit on Sep 15 2013, 12:46am)
|
|
|
morro91
Bree
Sep 15 2013, 2:10am
Post #23 of 39
(1524 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Theatrical edition will still rule the mainstream
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Most people will watch the Theatrical edition, so the language/nudity etc. probably won't matter that much.
I'm just curious as to what it is. Guess we'll have to wait :(
|
|
|
dormouse
Half-elven
Sep 15 2013, 7:57am
Post #24 of 39
(1506 views)
Shortcut
|
...about the sex rating is that even the theatrical version had a 'very mild impact' rating on sex (as opposed to no rating at all in some other categories). Now, I can't think of anything in the theatrical version, anything at all, that could be considered as a reference to sex, or an innuendo even.
Based on that, I don't think you have anything to worry about!
(But I'm with you on the spiders)
|
|
|
Starling
Half-elven
Sep 15 2013, 8:18am
Post #25 of 39
(1499 views)
Shortcut
|
you could argue that more than a few people around here found that certain dwarves had more than a 'very mild impact'. 
|
|
|
|
|
1
