|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News from Bree
spymaster@theonering.net
Jun 14 2013, 10:09am
Post #1 of 15
(905 views)
Shortcut
|
|
An Unexpected Journey Extended Edition given rating
|
Can't Post
|
|
 We've known for a while that there would be an Extended Edition of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Warner Bros.' press release back in March, at the time of the release of the Theatrical Edition DVD and Blu-ray, said that the Extended Edition would be 'available just in time for the holidays'. Now we've learned that this extended cut has been given a rating by The Motion Picture Association of America. Their bulletin (seen here) gives the movie the same rating as it had in theatrical release, PG-13. But here's the interesting part - in theatres, the PG-13 rating was for 'intense fantasy action violence and frightening images.' Here's what the rating says for the extended version:
'Rated PG-13 for extended sequences of intense fantasy action violence, frightening images and fleeting nudity.'
'...and fleeting nudity.' Now that is something to ponder. A glimpse of the dwarves wrecking Bilbo's bathroom? A scene where Bilbo leaves his house in such haste, he forgets more than his pocket handkerchief?! Being serious for a moment, what could this be? My best guess is some dwarvish high jinks; what do you think?
Thanks to ringer spies kirkempk and An anonymous Ringer for bringing this to our attention!
(This post was edited by entmaiden on Jun 14 2013, 6:52pm)
|
|
|
TheHutt
Gondor
Jun 14 2013, 4:02pm
Post #2 of 15
(554 views)
Shortcut
|
...MPAA has just realized that in the previous theatrical rating they oversaw some obvious fleeting nudity:
- Gollum wears nothing but a loinscloth,
- So does Great Goblin and most of the goblins for that part
- Not to forget Azog
- And the three trolls.
So yes, there's a lot of fleeting nudity already present. Maybe it's just the first time MPAA saw it as such.
Russian LOTR & Hobbit Site: Henneth-Annun.ru
|
|
|
hobbitylass
Bree
Jun 14 2013, 7:20pm
Post #4 of 15
(426 views)
Shortcut
|
To take it in a different direction, I was thinking it could be something in the scene with Gandalf meeting Bilbo as a child.
Similar to the Merry/Pippin fireworks scene in FOTR, there could be hobbits messing about with some of Gandalf's fireworks and we could see a hapless hobbit running about with his pants burned away - perhaps a quick glimpse of hobbit butt.
Young Bilbo could even be involved with the stunt somehow, to give him a mischievous streak.
|
|
|
namarie
Rohan
Jun 14 2013, 7:41pm
Post #5 of 15
(441 views)
Shortcut
|
taking a shower in one of Rivendell waterfalls, since he is the hot dwarf 
Or maybe Fili? 
“The world is not in your books and maps. It's out there!”
"Such is the nature of evil. In time all foul things come forth."
|
|
|
Sam20
Lorien
Jun 14 2013, 11:32pm
Post #6 of 15
(351 views)
Shortcut
|
Interesting discovery! The truth is in the details some might say. I do wonder though what this ''fleeting nudity'' could be. I can't think of no moment where this might be occuring. But I am thinking more of a dwarf bare chest or something of the kind. Nothing contreversial ( I hope)
|
|
|
Eye's on Guard
Lorien
Jun 14 2013, 11:39pm
Post #7 of 15
(356 views)
Shortcut
|
...say when he's running around or something (hence, "fleeting"). Then the rating difference between the theatrical and extended editions would mean more Riddles in the Dark!
|
|
|
arithmancer
Grey Havens
Jun 15 2013, 1:30am
Post #8 of 15
(315 views)
Shortcut
|
Male bare chests don't contribute to PG-13 ratings. (Not even to PG ratings-).
|
|
|
Silverlode
Forum Admin
/ Moderator
Jun 15 2013, 3:28am
Post #9 of 15
(313 views)
Shortcut
|
it could be Bombur getting pantsed and mooning the camera at some point. No evidence, just a hunch. I hope I'm wrong.
Silverlode
"Dark is the water of Kheled-zâram, and cold are the springs of Kibil-nâla, and fair were the many-pillared halls of Khazad-dûm in Elder Days before the fall of mighty kings beneath the stone."
|
|
|
AinurOlorin
Half-elven
Jun 15 2013, 7:36am
Post #10 of 15
(282 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Awww. But that we could have had some fleeting nudity from Arwen in the earlier films. . .
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
*sighing* lol We've known for a while that there would be an Extended Edition of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Warner Bros.' press release back in March, at the time of the release of the Theatrical Edition DVD and Blu-ray, said that the Extended Edition would be 'available just in time for the holidays'. Now we've learned that this extended cut has been given a rating by The Motion Picture Association of America. Their bulletin (seen here) gives the movie the same rating as it had in theatrical release, PG-13. But here's the interesting part - in theatres, the PG-13 rating was for 'intense fantasy action violence and frightening images.' Here's what the rating says for the extended version: 'Rated PG-13 for extended sequences of intense fantasy action violence, frightening images and fleeting nudity.' '... and fleeting nudity.' Now that is something to ponder. A glimpse of the dwarves wrecking Bilbo's bathroom? A scene where Bilbo leaves his house in such haste, he forgets more than his pocket handkerchief?! Being serious for a moment, what could this be? My best guess is some dwarvish high jinks; what do you think? Thanks to ringer spies kirkempk and An anonymous Ringer for bringing this to our attention!
"Hear me, hounds of Sauron, Gandalf is here! Fly if you value your foul skins, I will shrivel you from tail to snout if you step within this circle!"
"Do not be to eager to deal out death in judgement. Even the very wise cannot see all ends."
|
|
|
Na Vedui
Rohan
Jun 15 2013, 10:07pm
Post #11 of 15
(234 views)
Shortcut
|
Does the rating certificate for a DVD issue refer to just the film itself, or to the film plus any additional material on the discs? If the latter, there could be some behind-the-scenes antics that got the "fleeting nudity" flag, rather than something in the EE itself.
Does anyone know yet what extras will be on the EE discs this time? (maybe this has already been discussed in a thread, but I've missed it, if so.)
|
|
|
Ardamírë
Valinor
Jun 15 2013, 11:19pm
Post #12 of 15
(229 views)
Shortcut
|
as far as I'm aware. Normally the back of the cover will say something like "bonus content not rated."
"...not till now have I understood the tale of your people and their fall.
As wicked fools I scorned them, but I pity them at last.
For if this is indeed, as the Eldar say, the gift of the One to Men,
it is bitter to receive." -Arwen Undómiel
|
|
|
JWPlatt
Grey Havens
Jun 16 2013, 1:04am
Post #13 of 15
(227 views)
Shortcut
|
My vote is for Tauriel in the waterfall, possibly observed by one of the other male cast (or female - who cares?).
If they're looking for sales to the male youth demographic, they'd be smart to go this way. Actually, just make it the entire male demographic. Oh, and I guess if you make the observing male shirtless, everyone wins.
|
|
|
BoromirOfWinterfell
Rohan
Jun 16 2013, 6:43am
Post #14 of 15
(210 views)
Shortcut
|
|
It was the first thing that came to mind...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
But I'm a Thorin type of girl. I wouldn't mind Fili.
If I'm correct in my observations, the only shirtless people in any Middle-earth movie were Gollum, Frodo and the top half of Gandalf's chest.
My Aunt and I had this discussion before. Fran and Philippa need to worm something about shirtless dwarves into the scripts...
"Eala Earendel engla beorhtast
ofer middangeard monnum sended."
"Who put the tribbles in the quadrotriticale!?"
|
|
|
namarie
Rohan
Jun 17 2013, 11:12am
Post #15 of 15
(192 views)
Shortcut
|
yes, but Tauriel is not in the first movie.
You will have to wait for the second movie for this one ;)
"The world is not in your books and maps. It's out there!"
"Such is the nature of evil. In time all foul things come forth."
|
|
|
|
|
