|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spaldron
Ossiriand
Nov 25 2012, 11:55pm
Post #1 of 14
(1438 views)
Shortcut
|
|
PETA release their latest publicity stunt.
|
Can't Post
|
|
Just released on their site and facebook page here.
So it seems they waited all this time until the weeks before the premier to air their grievances despite knowing all this information for months by the disgruntled ex-wranglers. Shameless.
The Guardian have also written a few articles on this..
"A single dream is more powerful than a thousand realities."
|
|
|
QuackingTroll
Doriath
Nov 26 2012, 12:05am
Post #2 of 14
(885 views)
Shortcut
|
|
The comments on that PETA page...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Don't even know what to say here 
|
|
|
Carne
Dor-Lomin
Nov 26 2012, 12:10am
Post #3 of 14
(824 views)
Shortcut
|
|
They apparently only approve negative comments towards the production
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Looks like they want to be as one-sided as possible
|
|
|
imin
Doriath
Nov 26 2012, 12:12am
Post #4 of 14
(816 views)
Shortcut
|
|
This should show them for what they really are.
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
95% of animals 'sheltered' with PETA are killed, equals out to 37 per week.
Good news is no one takes peta seriously
|
|
|
duats
Hithlum
Nov 26 2012, 12:12am
Post #5 of 14
(792 views)
Shortcut
|
They're an embarrassment to their own cause.
Let them protest. Far be it for them to actually use their time and resources to actually help animals in need. Nah. Spending money to fly to New Zealand and protest a film premiere is far more important - despite the fact that this issue was investigated and resolved months ago. Anything for an attention grab, I suppose.
(This post was edited by duats on Nov 26 2012, 12:13am)
|
|
|
Faenoriel
Dor-Lomin
Nov 26 2012, 12:29am
Post #6 of 14
(760 views)
Shortcut
|
|
As said before... if they actually really CARED they wouldn't have waited
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
No, let me rephrase that: if the actually really believed in their own stories they wouldn't have waited.
But every word you say today
Gets twisted 'round some other way
And they'll hurt you if they think you've lied
|
|
|
SaltedPork
Nevrast
Nov 26 2012, 1:08am
Post #7 of 14
(771 views)
Shortcut
|
"In a movie that features CGI dragons, ogres, and hobbits, CGI animals would have fit in perfectly."
PETA lets slip there were be not one dragon, but DRAGONS. There will be ogres as well - can't wait to see what these will look like and where they will feature in the film. And apparently we got some CGI hobbits in there. These films will be better than I thought. 
In all reality I think PETA is a waste of time and money.
|
|
|
Eye's on Guard
Menegroth
Nov 26 2012, 1:32am
Post #8 of 14
(707 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Laughable...didn't even notice that
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
They have no idea of what they're talking about if they think CGI is used for hobbits 
|
|
|
Chopsta123
Mithlond
Nov 26 2012, 2:06am
Post #9 of 14
(682 views)
Shortcut
|
"Jackson could have made The Hobbit without using a single animal—and he should have."
shows you how much they know about filmmaking or what kind of a film The Hobbit is... 
|
|
|
totoro
Menegroth
Nov 26 2012, 2:38am
Post #10 of 14
(649 views)
Shortcut
|
|
|
|
RaoulJ
Ossiriand
Nov 26 2012, 7:44am
Post #11 of 14
(570 views)
Shortcut
|
There are cgi-hobbits, or at least one.. Bilbo will be replaced in some scènes by his digital double.
Still, Peta is just hurting their own cause
|
|
|
ElendilTheShort
Mithlond
Nov 26 2012, 9:12am
Post #12 of 14
(544 views)
Shortcut
|
the amount of people boycotting the movie on hearsay. Lynch mob mentality that alienates them, preventing them having a louder voice and ultimately harming their cause, which in itself is very worthy. The fact they resort to titilating, exploitive imagery in some of their campaigns doesn't help in trying to take them seriously either. Should be a tagline. Q: how many naked or semi naked women does it take to run a successful PETA campaign.
|
|
|
totoro
Menegroth
Nov 27 2012, 6:11am
Post #13 of 14
(357 views)
Shortcut
|
|
If it's more than zero, I like them more already. nt
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
the amount of people boycotting the movie on hearsay. Lynch mob mentality that alienates them, preventing them having a louder voice and ultimately harming their cause, which in itself is very worthy. The fact they resort to titilating, exploitive imagery in some of their campaigns doesn't help in trying to take them seriously either. Should be a tagline. Q: how many naked or semi naked women does it take to run a successful PETA campaign.
|
|
|
Ref
Ossiriand
Nov 27 2012, 2:25pm
Post #14 of 14
(353 views)
Shortcut
|
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
95% of animals 'sheltered' with PETA are killed, equals out to 37 per week.
Good news is no one takes peta seriously
I cannot believe PETA - what a despicable organisation.
Viewers of a nervous disposition may be interested to know that your television is off and I am speaking to you from inside your head...
*~* Hugh Dennis, Mock the Week *~*
Icon made by the talented wow_genius
|
|
|
|
|
