
|
|
 |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

elentari3018
Nargothrond

Jul 1, 1:42am
Post #51 of 67
(18730 views)
Shortcut
|
Faramir was just another object like a palantir that he possessed that was going to the grave with him. Yes, that's a dark view, but it happens. And we do not have a clear answer on how Denethor felt but i like to think also that he valued and loved Faramir at the end and not just because Gandalf said so. This is an interesting topic to me because i'm trying to figure out post-Quest how Faramir can navigate his feelings to move on in the 4th Age without his family. (well lots of anxiety and PTSD for him regarding the fact that his father only try to burn him alive)
"But he himself went up alone into the secret room under the summit of the Tower; and many who looked up thither at that time saw a pale light that gleamed and flickered from the narrow windows for a while, and then flashed and went out. And when Denethor descended again he went to Faramir and sat beside him without speaking, but the face of the Lord was grey, more deathlike than his son's."- The Siege of Gondor, RotK I think i read this is that yes, he is under the palantir clearly at the time, but what motivated him to commit suicide was that he lost all hope, he has too much pride to be taken down by Sauron, and he sought to take down Faramir with him because he still loved him enough not to want to be parted from him at the end. And yes, i'm sure that other threads (namely the one from 2 years ago) has mentioned his motivations but i just want to say despair drove him mad and instead of recovering, he had to do the most drastic thing that others may not have thought of. This is all book! Denthor. LIke what nowiz said above, i do not like to think of movie!Denethor at all because he was very one dimensional, flat, and oversimplified which NoWizardMe mentioned in his post.
"By Elbereth and Luthien the fair, you shall have neither the Ring nor me!" ~Frodo "And then Gandalf arose and bid all men rise, and they rose, and he said: 'Here is a last hail ere the feast endeth. Last but not least. For I name now those who shall not be forgotten and without whose valour nought else that was done would have availed; and I name before you all Frodo of the Shire and Samwise his servant. And the bards and the minstrels should give them new names: Bronwe athan Harthad and Harthad Uluithiad , Endurance beyond Hope and Hope Unquenchable.." ~Gandalf, The End of the Third Age , from The History of Middle Earth series "He knew now why Beregond spoke his name with love. He was a captain that men would follow, that he would follow, even under the shadow of the black wings."- Siege of Gondor, RotK
|
|
|

elentari3018
Nargothrond

Jul 1, 1:53am
Post #52 of 67
(18699 views)
Shortcut
|
I don't despise book! Denethor either
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I just like to figure out his thinking before he burned himself alive. DId the palantir hold him that he was not totally of sound mind? He seemed liked he knew what he wanted.
I would have things as they were in all the days of my life, and in the days of my longfathers before me: to be the Lord of this City in peace, and leave my chair to a son after me, who woudl be his own master and no wizard's pupil. But if doom denies this to me, then I will have naught; neither life diminished, nor love halved, nor honor abated." that is so eloquently spoken, not like someone who is about to jump into the fire and kill himself. Clearly, he knows what he wants but Gandalf says also as calmly that he could also choose to "faithfully surrender his charge " which Denethor denies that he would. Denethor also syas why do we fight "Battle is vain. Why should we wish to live longer? Why shoudl we not go to death side by side?" This despair isn't unfounded. Minas Tirith IS surrounded. It is not that Denethor is mad but he really lost hope and do we really blame him? Many do blame him and want him to use his soldiers to fight on but i am not sure all commanders can have that strong of a will to fight on. Contrast him to all that do keep fighting despite the odds stacked against him, not everyone can fight on and this is an example of a broken man. (and the palantir did not help his perception) So i would pity him a bit and not go on and despise him.
"By Elbereth and Luthien the fair, you shall have neither the Ring nor me!" ~Frodo "And then Gandalf arose and bid all men rise, and they rose, and he said: 'Here is a last hail ere the feast endeth. Last but not least. For I name now those who shall not be forgotten and without whose valour nought else that was done would have availed; and I name before you all Frodo of the Shire and Samwise his servant. And the bards and the minstrels should give them new names: Bronwe athan Harthad and Harthad Uluithiad , Endurance beyond Hope and Hope Unquenchable.." ~Gandalf, The End of the Third Age , from The History of Middle Earth series "He knew now why Beregond spoke his name with love. He was a captain that men would follow, that he would follow, even under the shadow of the black wings."- Siege of Gondor, RotK
(This post was edited by elentari3018 on Jul 1, 1:54am)
|
|
|

Silvered-glass
Nargothrond
Jul 2, 8:35am
Post #53 of 67
(11858 views)
Shortcut
|
Aragorn and Denethor as Leaders
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
A further point. In the talk to Swathmore College to which I've already referred, Tom Shippey says of Denethor: It is hard for people to grasp the idea of conflict of interests. That you can have people who are allied to each other and who are certainly on the same side. But who do not see things the same way, and Denethor actually is a person who's interests are only with Gondor. Well okay and that's true in both the book and the movie. But in the book it's accepted as, well unfortunate but perfectly reasonable. In the movie, this has to be demonized rather, because everybody is felt to have to pursue their interests the same way. "Tolkien Book to Jackson Script: The Medium and the Message" I only partly agree. I think it's certainly true that Gandalf has a hard time being the roving diplomat of Middle-earth because people want to protect their own borders and interests. Treebeard, who is not sure which side he is on because who is on his side? sums this up nicely. And, maybe fair enough: we should judge Denethor by how well he serves Gondor's interests, not how convenient he is for Gandalf or Aragorn. But - as already explained - I think if we ask how well Denethor serves Gondor the answer is not so well. Not so badly as movie-Denethor. But I think we have to read the text against itself most determinedly to come to any conclusion other than that the Return of the King is in Gondor's best interests. I think the White Council's aim to replace Denethor with a compliant puppet ruler - and I think that was exactly what the White Council meant to do with Aragorn - was not something befitting the supposed forces of good. I think Denethor was objectively doing a good job governing Gondor and did not need to be replaced. Yet the White Council wanted him replaced anyway. Maybe the White Council wanted for Gondor to switch to a more aggressive foreign policy against Sauron, but the Stewards disliked the idea of large numbers of combat deaths that would have been the inevitable result of such a policy and preferred to fight with the advantage of walls instead. When Aragorn gets into power, almost the first thing he does is march to the Black Gate, and that was close to being an utter and complete military disaster for Gondor, all for the sake of a diversion. And we never get the numbers for how many of the men under Aragorn's command ended up dead anyway... Aragorn even gets his forces surrounded and divided, so that they had to fight at a tactical disadvantage and were near to being wiped out completely before the end. Aragorn has no emotional connection to his subjects though, and so doesn't mind. I'm reminded of how Sauron uses his Orcs. Far from being the obvious True King, Aragorn's claim to the throne was in actuality remarkably weak, Aragorn was a (supposed) descendant of Arvedui, and that claim had already been rejected back in Arvedui's time. I would not even dismiss the possibility that Elrond had fabricated the lineage for Aragorn. In fact, I think it rather likely. Also, we only see the very beginnings of Aragorn's reign in any detail - the political honeymoon period. I think there is good reason to suspect that Aragorn wasn't such a great ruler after all, but the book ends where it does.
|
|
|

Meneldor
Doriath

Jul 2, 3:33pm
Post #54 of 67
(10359 views)
Shortcut
|
I disagree strenuously with parts of this post.
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Aragorn has no emotional connection to his subjects though, and so doesn't mind. I'm reminded of how Sauron uses his Orcs. During his younger days of errantry as Thorongil, Aragorn served Gondor closely and faithfully. I have no doubt he was thoroughly invested, both emotionally and practically, in the people of Gondor.
I would not even dismiss the possibility that Elrond had fabricated the lineage for Aragorn. In fact, I think it rather likely. I see nothing in JRRT's writings to support this theory. To the contrary, his stories often show us that such deceptions never end well.
Also, we only see the very beginnings of Aragorn's reign in any detail - the political honeymoon period. I think there is good reason to suspect that Aragorn wasn't such a great ruler after all, but the book ends where it does. The appendices indicate otherwise.
They that go down to the sea in ships, that do business in great waters, these see the works of the Lord, and His wonders in the deep. -Psalm 107
|
|
|

Silvered-glass
Nargothrond
Jul 3, 12:17pm
Post #55 of 67
(7891 views)
Shortcut
|
Aragorn has no emotional connection to his subjects though, and so doesn't mind. I'm reminded of how Sauron uses his Orcs. During his younger days of errantry as Thorongil, Aragorn served Gondor closely and faithfully. I have no doubt he was thoroughly invested, both emotionally and practically, in the people of Gondor. Aragorn had spent decades away from Gondor. He is not known to have made any notable friends and did not fall in love with a Gondorian woman. The only Gondorian person in the story who is known to know Aragorn from back then is Denethor who loathes Aragorn and is absolutely unwilling to have him as the King. No one in the main story sings Thorongil's praises and Aragorn himself doesn't bring back the name. Aragorn in the story shows himself as a disastrously incompetent commander who spends Gondorian lives as if they were very cheap. The diversion at the Black Gate could have been handled much better. The situation would have been even worse if the Mouth of Sauron also wasn't an incompetent commander. I think there was something major about Aragorn's original departure from Gondor that was passed over in the Appendices. I think the "my work is done" explanation makes no sense, as Aragorn would have been wanting to become the King even at that early time, and the major delays prevented him from getting to marry Arwen. Dropping out to gather more life experience doesn't make sense, as Denethor was younger than Thorongil and being a ranger in the North fails to teach many important skills for a king. I think Aragorn must have originally slunk away from Gondor in total disgrace. His military theories could perhaps have failed exceptionally hard, or there could have been something worse, such as him murdering Ecthelion to seize the throne, but then Denethor came back, having turned a supposed suicide mission into a great victory, and put a stop to Aragorn's ambitions.
I would not even dismiss the possibility that Elrond had fabricated the lineage for Aragorn. In fact, I think it rather likely. I see nothing in JRRT's writings to support this theory. To the contrary, his stories often show us that such deceptions never end well. I can't think of a single example of what you are talking about... Are you just talking about generic "good triumphing over evil"? Tolkien wrote his fair share of tragedy too. The closest thing I can think of is the poem "The Hoard" in which the dragon-slaying hero becomes a king and is years later overthrown in his old age as an unpopular tyrant. I'm also reminded of Thorin, another returning king pushed by Gandalf, who in this case fails with Thorin's death. I'm not questioning Thorin's ancestry, but Thorin in the story demonstrates that he would never have been a great king even if he had lived. His deficits in wisdom and diplomacy are notable, but I suppose Gandalf could have been counting on getting to make the big decisions in Thorin's stead,
Also, we only see the very beginnings of Aragorn's reign in any detail - the political honeymoon period. I think there is good reason to suspect that Aragorn wasn't such a great ruler after all, but the book ends where it does. The appendices indicate otherwise. The appendices are not written from the neutral omniscient point of view. The relevant portions are especially not-neutral to the point that I find that they stand out as obviously biased to the point of hagiography. This makes sense too, as we know that the published version of the Red Book of Westmarch was edited for Gondorian audiences.
|
|
|

Otaku-sempai
Elvenhome

Jul 3, 2:19pm
Post #56 of 67
(7878 views)
Shortcut
|
I think there was something major about Aragorn's original departure from Gondor that was passed over in the Appendices. I think the "my work is done" explanation makes no sense, as Aragorn would have been wanting to become the King even at that early time, and the major delays prevented him from getting to marry Arwen. Dropping out to gather more life experience doesn't make sense, as Denethor was younger than Thorongil and being a ranger in the North fails to teach many important skills for a king. I think Aragorn must have originally slunk away from Gondor in total disgrace. His military theories could perhaps have failed exceptionally hard, or there could have been something worse, such as him murdering Ecthelion to seize the throne, but then Denethor came back, having turned a supposed suicide mission into a great victory, and put a stop to Aragorn's ambitions. You neglect the fact that Aragorn was not in a position to wed Arwen when he left the service of Ecthelion II. It wasn't until much later in that year that the couple plighted their troth on the hill of Cerin Amroth, and it wasn't until well after that that Elrond challenged him to become the King of the Reunited Kingdoms of Gondor and Arnor. It is also recorded that "Thorongil" was much respected in Gondor and the steward Ecthelion highly valued him. As Thorongil, Aragorn left after his great victory against the Corsairs of Umbar, having led an attack that destroyed much of their fleet. That is hardly slinking away in disgrace, total or otherwise. Ah well, no thread seems complete these days without the input of our resident conspiracy theorist.
“Hell hath no fury like that of the uninvolved.” - Tony Isabella
|
|
|

Silvered-glass
Nargothrond
Fri, 11:12pm
Post #57 of 67
(4036 views)
Shortcut
|
You neglect the fact that Aragorn was not in a position to wed Arwen when he left the service of Ecthelion II. It wasn't until much later in that year that the couple plighted their troth on the hill of Cerin Amroth, and it wasn't until well after that that Elrond challenged him to become the King of the Reunited Kingdoms of Gondor and Arnor. Elrond's mysterious actions get an explanation if you consider the possibility that the immortal Elrond was playing the long game and using others to take over Gondor without dirtying his hands or making himself a target. Elrond even had a replica Elendilmír made, etc. Elrond in no way was setting an intentionally impossible mission for Aragorn to prevent him from being wed to Arwen, at least if the following quote is authentic or along the correct lines: "Aragorn, Arathorn's son, Lord of the Dúnedain, listen to me! A great doom awaits you, either to rise above the height of all your fathers since the days of Elendil, or to fall into darkness with all that is left of your kin. Many years of trial lie before you. You shall neither have wife, nor bind any woman to you in troth, until your time comes and you are found worthy of it." -- Elrond in Appendix A (The Tale of Aragorn and Arwen) Elrond then leaves open the possibility of letting Aragorn marry Arwen if he becomes worthy enough. Someone could claim that Elrond is merely foretelling, but it seems to me that he is making demands with Arwen as the carrot for doing a good job. This scene takes place before any of Aragorn's travels and after Aragorn had already fallen in love with Arwen. We know from Thorin's example that the White Council (or some of its members) get involved in overthrowing and installing rulers. In addition, Gandalf the Grey uncharacteristically shows an interest in educating Faramir, to Denethor's later regret. Later on, Gandalf the White rides to Minas Tirith with the intention of overthrowing Denethor in Aragorn's favor.
It is also recorded that "Thorongil" was much respected in Gondor and the steward Ecthelion highly valued him. As Thorongil, Aragorn left after his great victory against the Corsairs of Umbar, having led an attack that destroyed much of their fleet. That is hardly slinking away in disgrace, total or otherwise. The Appendices give a version of the events that shows signs of intentional tampering. This is only natural, as there is no reason to assume Gondor had freedom of the press, especially in matters relating to the King, especially when the King is sponsoring the project. To illustrate what a big deal this is, compare what Procopius says about Justinian the Great in the official biography vs. the version of the events Procopius gives in his Secret History. The difference in Justinian's characterization is dramatic. However, even the most blatant propaganda finds it difficult going against well-known bare historical facts. One of those is that Aragorn didn't stick around after his supposed great victory. At the time many thought that Thorongil had departed before his rival became his master -- Appendix A This could be interpreted as Aragorn not wanting to become the junior general taking orders from Denethor, who was a quick learner. The passage could also be interpreted as Aragorn having left around the time of Ecthelion's death, though that causes some issues with the official timeline. Therefore later, when all was made clear, many believed that Denethor, who was subtle in mind and looked further and deeper than other men of his day, had discovered who this stranger Thorongil in truth was, and suspected that he and Mithrandir designed to supplant him. -- Appendix A So it looks like there was at least some reason to think that Aragorn was already aiming to be the King as Thorongil but failed. He [..] fought for the Lord of Gondor by land and by sea; and then in the hour of victory he passed out of the knowledge of Men of the West, and went alone far into the East and deep into the South -- Appendix A (The Tale of Aragorn and Arwen) So when the great victory was won for Gondor, Aragorn left the region and without pausing to celebrate, went without any friends or companions into the lands of Gondor's enemies. How strange. There is no mention of Aragorn having any trouble for being a famous enemy general either. Aragorn's behavior is more consistent with someone who had been scheming against Gondor but failed. I tend to think that Denethor (whose military skill has been demonstrated in the story to be so vastly superior to Aragorn's it isn't funny) actually won the great victory against Umbar, but Aragorn had the history rewritten so that he could be the hero.
|
|
|

Morthoron
Hithlum

Sat, 3:30am
Post #58 of 67
(3460 views)
Shortcut
|
Perhaps that is the way YOU want it...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
By now, it is evident to everyone here that in each of your decidedly dark flights of fancy you want cynicism, dishonesty, conspiracy and utter betrayal by the leaders of the war against Sauron; but, of course, you did not write the story. Tolkien, a devout Catholic, and a man of honour, conviction and bravery in war, wrote the books. You have some deep-seeded desire to pervert every aspect of the story to fulfill whatever nonsensical and revisionist agenda you have conjured wholesale by crassly attempting to turn inherently good, faithful and steadfast characters into some revulsive and traitorous dogs. You want a modern bit of political hackery with a Gondorion gloss. You want characters who butcher the truth just as easily as they butcher their enemies. You want Game of Thrones: the Middle-earth Saga. Sorry, but I have nothing but contempt for your conspiratorial claptrap. Tolkien does not adhere to your modern mayhem. Those who conspire suffer severe consequences. Those who betray receive the ultimate sentence. Those who surrender to despair, like Denethor, are lost. Friendship is rewarded. Faith, loyalty and mercy are what destroys the Ring in the end. A "eucatastrophe" occurs -- and the existential hope of redemption. Tolkien is old-fashioned in that sense, almost archaic. He does not adhere to the cynical norms of 20th century fiction, and was often ridiculed for it. And it is equally evident you simply don't understand Tolkien or the story at all. To expend so much energy and to be so wrong is rather sad.
|
|
|

CuriousG
Gondolin

Sun, 2:49am
Post #59 of 67
(3369 views)
Shortcut
|
I believe Archive of Our Own would be a far more receptive forum for a Mirror Universe version of Tolkien. Most people on TORN embrace the optimism and wholesome values and ideals and aren't looking to subvert them.
|
|
|

Lissuin
Doriath

Sun, 12:02pm
Post #60 of 67
(3078 views)
Shortcut
|
Very well said, Morthoron. Tolkien in a nutshell:
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
“It's like in the great stories, Mr. Frodo. The ones that really mattered. Full of darkness and danger they were. And sometimes you didn't want to know the end. Because how could the end be happy? How could the world go back to the way it was when so much bad had happened? But in the end, it’s only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer. Those were the stories that stayed with you. That meant something, even if you were too small to understand why. But I think, Mr. Frodo, I do understand. I know now. Folk in those stories had lots of chances of turning back, only they didn’t. They kept going, because they were holding on to something. That there is some good in this world, and it's worth fighting for.”
The film writers recognized how vital it was to include that beautifully simple book quote verbatim if they wanted to tell Tolkien's great story. Cheers, mate.
|
|
|

squire
Gondolin

Sun, 1:32pm
Post #61 of 67
(3071 views)
Shortcut
|
Sam's famous speech about 'some good in the world, etc.' is not quoted verbatim from Tolkien
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
It's an amalgam of several speeches in the book, plus some additional ideas of the screenwriters' own invention - primarily, the idea that the adventurers in the 'old tales and songs' were motivated by the idea of fighting for "some good in the world". This has come up before, and I can't find the reference now because it goes back to the Beginning. But I think it was either Reverend or NZ Strider who first criticized the Jackson films' transformation of Frodo and Sam's motives, from accidental or fate-driven to a kind of ethical idealism that Tolkien never inserts into his story.
squire online: Unfortunately my longtime internet service provider abandoned its hosting operations last year. I no longer have any online materials to share with the TORn community.
= Forum has no new posts. Forum needs no new posts.
|
|
|

Lissuin
Doriath

Sun, 5:08pm
Post #62 of 67
(3058 views)
Shortcut
|
Keeping RR discussion honest, as always, sir. (thumbs up emoji) I stand corrected. Note to self: It does absolutely no good to try to refute ideas one thinks are incorrect interpretations without checking that one has one's own Tolkien facts straight. This is just one very good example of why Reading Room discussions continue to be of value. Your link to the 2014 discussion is appreciated. Elizabeth added a quote from Reverend farther along the thread.
|
|
|

CuriousG
Gondolin

Mon, 2:46pm
Post #63 of 67
(2660 views)
Shortcut
|
I think their moral imperative is unmistakable
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
so I disagree with Reverend's conclusion about Just Not Getting It. While I agree with him they had a sense of duty for responsibility's sake, they *also* knew what they were part of a great mission to defeat evil and protect the lands of the good. Sam didn't understand it as well as Frodo, but Frodo understood it completely, so it may have made less sense for Sam to make that speech in the movie than Frodo. Frodo's rationale to Gandalf for starting the Quest:
‘I should like to save the Shire, if I could – though there have been times when I thought the inhabitants too stupid and dull for words, and have felt that an earthquake or an invasion of dragons might be good for them. But I don’t feel like that now. I feel that as long as the Shire lies behind, safe and comfortable, I shall find wandering more bearable: I shall know that somewhere there is a firm foothold, even if my feet cannot stand there again.' Just prior to Frodo saying at the Council of Elrond that he'll (again) undertake the quest to destroy the One, Glorfindel lays out the moral stakes in response to Elrond:
'But maybe when the One has gone, the Three will fail, and many fair things will fade and be forgotten. That is my belief.’ ‘Yet all the Elves are willing to endure this chance,’ said Glorfindel, ‘if by it the power of Sauron may be broken, and the fear of his dominion be taken away for ever.’ Frodo gets a reminder in Galadriel's Mirror:Then there was a pause, and after it many swift scenes followed that Frodo in some way knew to be parts of a great history in which he had become involved. Sam's song in Cirith Ungol while searching for Frodo makes it clear that good things may be remote from them, but that's what they're struggling for:
In western lands beneath the Sun the flowers may rise in Spring, the trees may bud, the waters run, the merry finches sing. Or there maybe ‘tis cloudless night and swaying beeches bear the Elven-stars as jewels white amid their branching hair. Though here at journey’s end I lie in darkness buried deep, beyond all towers strong and high, beyond all mountains steep, above all shadows rides the Sun and Stars for ever dwell: I will not say the Day is done, nor bid the Stars farewell. >>> How do you not get the point of that song??? [Great song to go back to Elentari's OP.] Then Frodo is rescued by Sam: in prison, tortured, beaten, naked, robbed, and without his precious Ring. But his concern isn't about duty, it's about evil conquering the world. This is blunt.
‘They’ve taken everything, Sam,’ said Frodo. ‘Everything I had. Do you understand? Everything!’ He cowered on the floor again with bowed head, as his own words brought home to him the fullness of the disaster, and despair overwhelmed him. ‘The quest has failed, Sam. Even if we get out of here, we can’t escape. Only Elves can escape. Away, away out of Middle-earth, far away over the Sea. If even that is wide enough to keep the Shadow out.’ So as Demnation said in 2014, the movies distilled that message rather than get it wrong or oversimplify it. It's not like they were running a marathon just to prove they had the will and stamina to run a marathon. They were literally on an ethical mission to defeat ultimate evil.
|
|
|

Silvered-glass
Nargothrond
Mon, 7:48pm
Post #64 of 67
(2404 views)
Shortcut
|
I believe Archive of Our Own would be a far more receptive forum for a Mirror Universe version of Tolkien. Most people on TORN embrace the optimism and wholesome values and ideals and aren't looking to subvert them. I must remind you that Tolkien is the author of such works as The Sea-Bell and much of The Silmarillion and such works as Errantry and Farmer Giles of Ham. The main character of Errantry is even a rapist who gets away with it all. But there are, I fear, no hobbits in The Silmarillion (or history of the Three Jewels), little fun or earthiness but mostly grief and disaster. Those critics who scoffed at The Lord because 'all the good boys came home safe and everyone was happy ever after' (quite untrue) ought to be satisfied. They will not be, of course – even if they deign to notice the book! -- Letter 227 Here we see that Tolkien himself didn't see his own work as all that optimistic. I think Tolkien is the type of author (similar to Stephen Donaldson) who likes to set up great goodness and beauty so that the reader feels something when that beauty is harmed or removed from the world. And so we get the Darkening of Valinor, etc. etc. etc.
|
|
|

Silvered-glass
Nargothrond
Mon, 8:24pm
Post #65 of 67
(2325 views)
Shortcut
|
The Man who Dreamed of Faeryland
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Sam's song in Cirith Ungol while searching for Frodo makes it clear that good things may be remote from them, but that's what they're struggling for:
In western lands beneath the Sun the flowers may rise in Spring, the trees may bud, the waters run, the merry finches sing. Or there maybe ‘tis cloudless night and swaying beeches bear the Elven-stars as jewels white amid their branching hair. Though here at journey’s end I lie in darkness buried deep, beyond all towers strong and high, beyond all mountains steep, above all shadows rides the Sun and Stars for ever dwell: I will not say the Day is done, nor bid the Stars farewell. >>> How do you not get the point of that song??? [Great song to go back to Elentari's OP.] Then Frodo is rescued by Sam: in prison, tortured, beaten, naked, robbed, and without his precious Ring. But his concern isn't about duty, it's about evil conquering the world. This is blunt. ‘They’ve taken everything, Sam,’ said Frodo. ‘Everything I had. Do you understand? Everything!’ He cowered on the floor again with bowed head, as his own words brought home to him the fullness of the disaster, and despair overwhelmed him. ‘The quest has failed, Sam. Even if we get out of here, we can’t escape. Only Elves can escape. Away, away out of Middle-earth, far away over the Sea. If even that is wide enough to keep the Shadow out.’ The poem above has some pretty obvious parallels to The Man who Dreamed of Faeryland by W. B. Yeats. I might as well quote the entire thing:
He stood among a crowd at Dromahair; His heart hung all upon a silken dress, And he had known at last some tenderness, Before earth took him to her stony care; But when a man poured fish into a pile, It Seemed they raised their little silver heads, And sang what gold morning or evening sheds Upon a woven world-forgotten isle Where people love beside the ravelled seas; That Time can never mar a lover's vows Under that woven changeless roof of boughs: The singing shook him out of his new ease. He wandered by the sands of Lissadell; His mind ran all on money cares and fears, And he had known at last some prudent years Before they heaped his grave under the hill; But while he passed before a plashy place, A lug-worm with its grey and muddy mouth Sang that somewhere to north or west or south There dwelt a gay, exulting, gentle race Under the golden or the silver skies; That if a dancer stayed his hungry foot It seemed the sun and moon were in the fruit: And at that singing he was no more wise. He mused beside the well of Scanavin, He mused upon his mockers: without fail His sudden vengeance were a country tale, When earthy night had drunk his body in; But one small knot-grass growing by the pool Sang where -- unnecessary cruel voice -- Old silence bids its chosen race rejoice, Whatever ravelled waters rise and fall Or stormy silver fret the gold of day, And midnight there enfold them like a fleece And lover there by lover be at peace. The tale drove his fine angry mood away. He slept under the hill of Lugnagall; And might have known at last unhaunted sleep Under that cold and vapour-turbaned steep, Now that the earth had taken man and all: Did not the worms that spired about his bones proclaim with that unwearied, reedy cry That God has laid His fingers on the sky, That from those fingers glittering summer runs Upon the dancer by the dreamless wave. Why should those lovers that no lovers miss Dream, until God burn Nature with a kiss? The man has found no comfort in the grave. The connection to the Yeats poem gives the scene a much darker twist, though I suppose it could be argued that Tolkien disagreed with the point Yeats made with his poem. In any case, the strong parallels between the two poems give the impression that a very dark poem about Hell was something Tolkien personally enjoyed quite a bit, enough to pay homage to it. (The Sea-Bell has also been said, and not by me, to have been influenced by The Man who Dreamed of Faeryland.)
|
|
|

Ethel Duath
Gondolin

Mon, 8:47pm
Post #67 of 67
(2241 views)
Shortcut
|
Can't quite leave it at that--
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Thank you for putting in all those quotes. I absolutely agree that it's unmistakable. They certainly didn't know what they were getting into, and that part of it had to do with fate and outside forces. But once they got it, they embraced it. There is not one reason for Frodo to have dragged himself kicking and screaming all the way to Mordor if he didn't care about the larger picture.
|
|
|
|
|