In best deej voice: "What movies did you watch this weekend?"

deej is pulling a Radagast for a few weeks and is ... unavailable. Rumors of a possible role as Itaril in the Hobbit are just that - rumors - but have not been denied.

So let's while away the time until her return by discussing what movies & TV shows we've been watching. Mrs. Notta & I rewatched Fargo this weekend - first time since it came out on video, yeah, long enough ago that we rented a VCR tape, oh the humanity! - it was as enjoyabley quirky and violent as I remembered it. And, as someone who lived near enough that Fargo was the big city to take your prom date to for an impressive dining experience, it made me a bit homesick.

How about you?

Notta
 
I'm glad the scriptwriters finished up with a happy ending. Too many of these British dramas kill off a major character in the last couple of minutes, or at least contrive some way to leave the viewer bummed out.

This happy ending seemed a bit rushed, not to mention predictable -- I mean, at least once I'd like to see a character on a TV show give birth without it being a big emergency situation, just a normal process.

And there were holes in the plot. Why did the chauffeur have a change of heart? How on earth could the Nazi sister be entertaining the German ambassador at 1 am in the morning with no one in the house noticing?

But I enjoyed seeing the young footman return, and he and the maid finally growing up, and it was a nice touch to have the lost sister found, and good riddance to the Nazi sister, and....

Well, we enjoyed it, even though we felt it lacked the appeal of Downton Abbey.

We also watched the most recent episode of Doctor Who, which, unlike the previous episodes this year, at least hung together as a story, sort of -- perhaps because it was written by Neil Gaiman. Overall, though, the season has been a disappointment, lots of noise and flashing lights but very little actual STORY.
 
We watched The Illusionist by the same people who did The Triplets of Belleville. However, it was not - in my opinion - as good as the Triplets had been.

The animation was lovely and detailed, but I didn't give a hoot about any of the characters, except the rabbit who was constantly biting people for his being shoved into a hat or a tiny cage.
 
it was really bought home to him, in the person of the maid that died (can't remember her name) and her daughter how indiscriminately hateful the fascist position was--I don't really have a problem with that. But yeah, it's a little unbelievable that Persephone could be entertaining the Nazi at 1 a.m. without anyone knowing--in a house that comparatively small. (still a mansion, especially compared to MY house. [laugh])

I would really assume that we haven't seen the last of Persephone. She'll come to an interesting grief just like that Mitford sister. (Unity?)

I did like Downton better, although when I watched Up,Down the second time, I really enjoyed it much better.
 
Let me start by giving a nod to Hollywood for taking a less-travelled route by having two romantically involved characters played by an older woman and a younger man, and without the age difference being part of the plot. It was nice to see the gender ages switched for a change.

This was a surprisingly melancholy film, because of the early tragedy to the young man, its timing during the Depression, and the ending. And one scene in particular - thankfully not shown, but horrible for all of that - was hard to take. But overall I thought the movie was quite well done.

Particular plaudits go to the actor who played the Ringmaster. He managed to give some understanding and nuance to horrible, violent and malicious character, making him a whole person rather than an Evil Villain.
 
We also thought he simply got tired of Lady Persie and her posturing.

I can see where the characters would grow on you with a longer acquaintance. Do you know whether they're continuing on with more episodes, like they are with Downton Abbey?
 
...with Paul Bettany, Karl Urban, Maggie Q...and Brad Dourif!. Let's see action-packed, loads of CGI, bleak landscapes, lots of you-know-its-fake-blood, and likely the most unattractive vampires I have seen in a long while--maybe ever. Karl and Brad share a scene that may make your LotR geek o'meter go off [cool] [laugh].

Also--AMC's "The Killing"--ahhhhhhhhh, I can't believe I let myself get caught up in another series! But at this point, how can I not go along with finding out whodunnit?
 
Wondering because I thought the movie had potential but never completely carried it off.

The book is The Dark Fields by Alan Glynn
 
I most wonder what they will do with the Indian secretary. I'm afraid his story potential may be more limited than the others at that time. Obviously, we are about to do war (on both Downton and Up,Down, only different wars) so we'll be seeing some of that.

And yes, I'm sure your theory regarding the Chauffer's growing testiness with P's posturing played into it.

Incidentally, which version of Downton did you watch--the American or the British. I hope you saw the British--there's more footage there--i.e. a story about the theft of those snuff boxes Hugh Bonneville's character collected.
 
I saw the version of Downton Abbey broadcast by PBS. That was the American version, I take it, because I don't remember anything about the theft of snuffboxes.

I hate when they cut bits out of the American versions. I was quibbling over plot gaps in Foyle's War, then discovered PBS was showing a slightly shortened version. While I hate to miss any of Downton Abbey, there the loss of plot bits didn't matter quite so much as in a mystery.
 
and the curse. I get the region 2 discs because I'm spoiled, and can't wait. That's how I saw Up,Down several months before they showed it on PBS, and how I knew there was more to DA. I can't remember all the bits that were cut offhand, but perhaps they are on Youtube ? Also, the American blu-ray of DA has the British version, even though it is a region A (North America) disc. I don't know about the DVD region one disc. I just don't know why PBS cut it.

I didn't know they had cut Foyles War. My sister is the FW expert and lover, although I will be watching her disc in a few months. She tends to buy the British version of her favorit Britdramas and Britcoms because they are released on disc first there (usually), they cost less (or at least they did before the cost of shipping went up on Amazon.co.uk) and notably, they are the complete version--not edited.
 
The main reason was Bruce Wilis, one of my fav actors, then I red some articles about and I saw there was a good cast and when there is CIA or FBI into there is always action and I like it
however the movie is not a masterpiece, just 2 good hours to spent nicely
VOTE: 7
 
I watched it today before my final.

It's a historical documentary educational film about what happened to art and culture during the European front in WWII. It was absolutely insane. I knew a bit about the looting, but the images and stories they shared was mind-boggling.

Basically Hitler was very systematic about what was to be kept and what was to be destroyed, and what was going to happen to all of these artworks. He saw Warsaw as being Slavic, and thus degenerate, and ordered its complete annihilation- every building was to be toppled, and the palace completely destroyed. By the end of the War, the Nazis did so. Everything you see in the main city of Warsaw now that looks old- it was all reconstructed. None of it is the original.

However, the southern Polish city of Crakow was spared the fate because he saw its culture and people as Germanic in origin. All of the buildings remained up. He thought about doing to Paris what he did to Warsaw because he did not want Paris to be the crown jewel of the world of beauty and strength. However, after his architect Speer showed him the layouts and model for the new Berlin, Germania, Hitler left Paris be because it would be nothing compared to the magnificence of Germania once it was completed.

It also described what museums around Europe did to protect their vast collections. The Louvre was prepared for the invasion- they shipped out all 14,000 pieces of work they had, including the very fragile Nike statue. They were hidden in estates and castles in the countryside; the reason Hitler did not pursue those pieces was because his forces were so spread out that he could not control France if they went in an all-out rebellion. So France was mostly spared what Poland and Russia were not.

It also talked about the Allies, especially the US effort to preserve and not bomb as much artwork as possible. It was not always possible- unfortunately one bomb was misfired and destroyed the famous Campo Santo because of a fire. They are still restoring the frescos that once stood there. To the US's credit, it was an American art-type (specifically assigned the job, one of a few hundred) that had all the locales gather every single fresco piece and organized the effort to start putting them back together. He is buried there today.

There was also talk about Florence, one of the greatest art cities well, ever. The Allies wanted to preserve it as much as possible, but the Nazis had an important railyard right in the middle of the town. They managed to bomb the railyard in a raid without touching one building considered significant to art and cultural history. It made Florentines rather happy, according to someone interviewed in the film.

The Nazis, however, when they found they would lose the city, destroyed the beautiful bridges Michelangelo himself had designed. Looking at the film footage, I wanted to cry.

The thing about the Nazis, though, is that while the destruction of the bridges in Florence was just petty destruction, other times, especially in the middle of the war, they were very systematic about what was kept and what was destroyed. They were not simply killing people-- as horrible as that is. They were attempting to completely erase any reference to Jewish or Slavic culture by completely dismantling all Slavic and Jewish buildings. While at first only valuables and works of art were taken from Jewish (and other "degenerate") homes, by the early 40s they were taking *everything* in those empty homes, having Jewish slaves sort through them, and then sending them back to Germany. One poor man recalls seeing his possessions- and pictures of his family- as he sorted through them. And he saved them for a year or so until he was sent to Birkenau.

I think one reason WWII still fascinates people is because of the very methodical and systematic destruction of not just people, but a *certain* people of very specific races and cultures. It takes a very special type of evil person to do that. In war throughout the ages, lands were pillaged just as they were crossed. They were targeted often for political reasons, and even if the other culture did loathe another, they attempted to conquer the people, not completely annihilate them. Men like Hitler are thankfully rare.

One wonders what would have happened if he was just a better artist and got accepted into that art school he applied to. One wonders.
 
Thanks.

Ah, I see I already had it in my Netflix instant queue. I'll get on it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top