Our Sponsor Sideshow Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Hobbit:
Reviews #20

thomasofrohan
Lorien

Dec 18 2014, 8:21pm

Post #1 of 13 (1148 views)
Shortcut
Reviews #20 Can't Post

Currently at 61% after 159 reviews. Desolation of Smaug ended with about 215, so we should expect another fifty or so reviews before the meter settles. Unless we get a wave of positive ones, this film could very well have a lower score than AUJ (and barely hang onto a 'Certified Fresh' rating). Disappointing, but ah well.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/..._of_the_five_armies/


Estel78
Tol Eressea

Dec 18 2014, 8:30pm

Post #2 of 13 (654 views)
Shortcut
Certified fresh [In reply to] Can't Post

As far as i know only movies with 70 or above get the certified fresh stamp. AUJ didn't get one.


macfalk
Valinor


Dec 18 2014, 8:31pm

Post #3 of 13 (641 views)
Shortcut
It needs 75% to get certified fresh, right? [In reply to] Can't Post

Well, that seems like wishful thinking indeed at this point. I was so wrong when I made my prediction - I never expected this freefall to happen. I thought it would land at 80%. How wrong I was!

The greatest adventure is what lies ahead.


FrogmortonJustice65
Lorien


Dec 18 2014, 8:41pm

Post #4 of 13 (671 views)
Shortcut
just confirms that critics are mostly incompetent. [In reply to] Can't Post

And that the tomato-meter is kind of a stupid concept. Penguins of Madgascar has 73%. Haven't seen it, and not trying to criticize it, but I find it hard to believe that BOFA is more than 10 points worse than it. Just goes to show how arbitrary the tomato-meter can be when comparing movies across genres.

 photo cbccab4e-f61e-4be5-aaa1-20e302430c7c.jpg


Mr. Arkenstone (isaac)
Tol Eressea


Dec 18 2014, 8:44pm

Post #5 of 13 (646 views)
Shortcut
finally someone says it [In reply to] Can't Post

stupid tomatoeter thing

The flagon with the dragon has the brew that is true

Survivor to the battle for the fifth trailer



thomasofrohan
Lorien

Dec 18 2014, 9:00pm

Post #6 of 13 (564 views)
Shortcut
My bad. [In reply to] Can't Post

It's not going to be 'Certified Fresh', but at least it's not 'Rotten'. I'm a little taken aback by how quickly the reviews turned against this film. It was looking like it would at least match DoS's score after the first few waves.


(This post was edited by thomasofrohan on Dec 18 2014, 9:01pm)


thomasofrohan
Lorien

Dec 18 2014, 9:07pm

Post #7 of 13 (602 views)
Shortcut
Rating slightly moved up - now at 62%. [In reply to] Can't Post

 


Lindele
Gondor

Dec 18 2014, 9:30pm

Post #8 of 13 (566 views)
Shortcut
I thought it was pretty clear [In reply to] Can't Post

when the reviews started coming in for AUJ (before I even saw it) that critics weren't really going to give this trilogy a chance. They wanted it to be The Lord of the Rings, or they wanted it to be short because attention spans are at an all time history of the world low.
When I did see AUJ on opening day and realized that while it wasn't LOTR, it was still very good, I made a judgment that critics opinions will have no sway on my feelings or thoughts about this trilogy.

And yes, Rotten Tomatoes is incredibly stupid. I spent a lot of time editing Richard Roeper's movie review videos for his website, and while I really respect the guy and often listen to his opinions, I thought his rating system was flawed. He would give 'Fast and the Furious 7' a 4/5 or 5/5 because 'it delivered what was expected of it' which wasn't that it was masterful film, but that it was the right amount of action and fun etc...and he would give a cinematic masterpiece the same rating. I don't understand how this makes sense or is appropriate. You can't give Fast 7 and Citizen Kane the same rating because they both delivered on expectations, IMO.


FrogmortonJustice65
Lorien


Dec 18 2014, 9:53pm

Post #9 of 13 (497 views)
Shortcut
couldn't agree more [In reply to] Can't Post

the criticisms haven't affected my enjoyment of the films -- just think its funny that PJ made a movie that both satisfied me, and some previous concerns of the critics (BOFA has the shortest runtime and is pretty concise and quick-paced) but its getting ranked lower than both AUJ and DOS.

 photo cbccab4e-f61e-4be5-aaa1-20e302430c7c.jpg


Bombadil
Half-elven


Dec 19 2014, 1:02am

Post #10 of 13 (445 views)
Shortcut
"MetaCritic" is MORE reliable than RT [In reply to] Can't Post

Current Results
Critics:

POSITIVE 21
Mixed 22
Negative 1 {Based on 44 Critics} Meta Score 58

Viewers:

POS 29
Mixed 2
Neg 6 {Based on 143 Ratings} Meta Score 7.9

OKAY? who was PJ making this Movie FOR? Critics Approval..
NOT, he MADE this for FANS

WHo do you Trust more?

GO over to www.MetaCritic, write a Review
it's EASY

IT would be in your Rightz to do, SSooo. NOW!

bomby

www.charlie-art.biz
"What Your Mind can conceive... charlie can achieve"


Elskidor
Rohan


Dec 19 2014, 4:42am

Post #11 of 13 (370 views)
Shortcut
screw RT [In reply to] Can't Post

I loved it. Just wished it was longer.


Dipling
Lorien

Dec 19 2014, 6:07am

Post #12 of 13 (370 views)
Shortcut
I bet [In reply to] Can't Post

The score for any Hobbit movie would be up by 15-20% if PJ would shoot it on Film not digital (no HFR) and if there would be only two movies.


mefansmum
Rivendell

Dec 19 2014, 11:36am

Post #13 of 13 (351 views)
Shortcut
Some more appreciative reviews [In reply to] Can't Post

http://www.stardem.com/...15-bf6e184ad9a0.html

http://bringmethenews.com/...-of-the-five-armies/

http://www.nwherald.com/...nt-flourish/aj6i68r/

http://www.wfaa.com/...ive-armies/20577681/

http://www.stltoday.com/...3d-c062ec1bb73b.html

https://www.victoriaadvocate.com/...he-five-armies-2014/

and one not so keen

http://www.omaha.com/...21-c0d9e4397f7d.html


(This post was edited by mefansmum on Dec 19 2014, 11:42am)

 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.