Our Sponsor Sideshow Collectibles Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net?
Consider a donation!

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Hobbit:
Ughhh, I can't believe I'm about to bring up the lighting issue again
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Shelob'sAppetite
Valinor

Sep 28 2012, 1:05am

Post #51 of 55 (965 views)
Shortcut
Great [In reply to] Can't Post

And if so, I might just learn to "stop worrying, and love the Red Epic!"


Fardragon
Rohan

Sep 28 2012, 8:54am

Post #52 of 55 (960 views)
Shortcut
I'm sure it will be a great 3D movie. [In reply to] Can't Post

It's the 2D version I'm worried about, along with having a completely different feel to the LotR films.

A Far Dragon is the best kind...


Shelob'sAppetite
Valinor

Sep 28 2012, 4:30pm

Post #53 of 55 (1008 views)
Shortcut
What will be the problem with the 2D version? [In reply to] Can't Post

I plan to first watch the film in 2D, and don't want to be seeing a vastly inferior product...


redgiraffe
Rohan

Oct 1 2012, 5:37am

Post #54 of 55 (1015 views)
Shortcut
2D vs. 3D [In reply to] Can't Post

I don't know if anyone has answered this yet.

I hear a lot of people saying that the brightness level is high because the 3D glasses will darken the picture.

That's all fine and dandy but what will the brightness level be when watching it in 2D. Are they going to make it slightly darker, or is it going to be as bright as watching 3D without the glasses. I hope it's darker.

Secondly, what brightness level are we seeing with the trailer?

-Sir are you classified as human
-Negative, I am a meat-popsicle


Fardragon
Rohan

Oct 1 2012, 7:53am

Post #55 of 55 (971 views)
Shortcut
There are a number of things. [In reply to] Can't Post

But the biggest one is, if you can remove a dimension form a movie without loosing anything, then that extra dimension wasn't being used properly in the first place.

We have already discussed contrast and colour saturation. Whilst these could be tackled in post production, my experience of 2D prints is that the film producers tend not to bother. I caught Journey to the Centre of the Earth in 2D on TV the other day, and the colours looked like an LSD trip!

The issue that cannot be fixed in post-production is shot composition. To make what's happening clear, you have to separate it. So, in a 2D film, you have screen left, screen right, screen centre. In a 3D film, you have the option to separate action into foreground, middle-ground, background instead. We see a couple of shots that do this in the trailer. When you convert such a shot into 2D, everything can end up compressed into a confusing mess where it is difficult to tell what is going on.

For these, and other reasons, I expect the 2D print of The Hobbit to be significantly inferior to the 3D version.

A Far Dragon is the best kind...

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.