Our Sponsor Sideshow Collectibles Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net?
Consider a donation!

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Hobbit:
Azog's Original Barrel Ride
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page Last page  View All

Chen G.
Rohan

May 21, 2:23pm

Post #201 of 219 (1155 views)
Shortcut
Nothing is verboten, but some things aren't looked favourably upon [In reply to] Can't Post

Belittling acclaimed filmmakers is one of them.


(This post was edited by Chen G. on May 21, 2:26pm)


Solicitr
Gondor


May 21, 2:31pm

Post #202 of 219 (1151 views)
Shortcut
Subject [In reply to] Can't Post

Michael Bay is "acclaimed"? Wink


Paulo Gabriel
Lorien

May 21, 3:08pm

Post #203 of 219 (1147 views)
Shortcut
He was obviously referring to PJ. [In reply to] Can't Post

 


(This post was edited by Paulo Gabriel on May 21, 3:09pm)


dernwyn
Forum Admin / Moderator


May 21, 4:31pm

Post #204 of 219 (1141 views)
Shortcut
Okay, folks, let's stop this sub-thread right here. [In reply to] Can't Post

Before it devolves further.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"I desired dragons with a profound desire"


Paulo Gabriel
Lorien

May 21, 11:12pm

Post #205 of 219 (1101 views)
Shortcut
I agree. // [In reply to] Can't Post

 


Paulo Gabriel
Lorien

May 25, 11:10pm

Post #206 of 219 (637 views)
Shortcut
Well... [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To

In Reply To
PJ's Hobbit is a very intelligent movie.


Maybe, but not consistantly. Gags like smoke coming out of Radagast's ears might play well in a Loony Tune, but not so well in a live-action movie that isn't an outright parody. We also have characters surviving without serious injury falls that should have killed the hardiest Dwarf. Then there is Jackson's fast-and-loose attitude for matters of time and distance, with characters seemingly taking only a couple of days to make journeys that should take weeks (I'm looking at YOU, Legolas and Tauriel).


I think those are rather minor points, but you are free to think differently...


Otaku-sempai
Immortal


May 26, 1:01am

Post #207 of 219 (631 views)
Shortcut
Well, indeed. [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
I think those are rather minor points, but you are free to think differently...


I wouldn't call characters pulling off stunts that would be impossible without teleportation (or at least the power of rapid flight) a minor point, but to each his own.

#FidelityToTolkien


Paulo Gabriel
Lorien

Fri, 3:52am

Post #208 of 219 (367 views)
Shortcut
Just ask yourself... [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To

In Reply To
I think those are rather minor points, but you are free to think differently...


I wouldn't call characters pulling off stunts that would be impossible without teleportation (or at least the power of rapid flight) a minor point, but to each his own.


...how many in the general audience would care or notice such things. People like Transformers, they don't care about physical plausibility, let alone geographical plausibility (of a fictional land, nonetheless). And Elrond already did this in ROTK when he travelled from Rivendell to Gondor in a relatively short amount of time. Do you take issue with this Elrond thing as well?


Otaku-sempai
Immortal


Fri, 2:41pm

Post #209 of 219 (307 views)
Shortcut
Ya know? [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
...how many in the general audience would care or notice such things. People like Transformers, they don't care about physical plausibility, let alone geographical plausibility (of a fictional land, nonetheless). And Elrond already did this in ROTK when he travelled from Rivendell to Gondor in a relatively short amount of time. Do you take issue with this Elrond thing as well?


It doesn't matter to me what the general audience can be expected to know; it's enough that I know and I find it a bit insulting that Peter expects me to just accept this. At least with Elrond, we don't have a clear idea of when he left from Rivendell (for Rohan, not Gondor--though he doesn't seem to have continued on with King Theoden's forces to Gondor).

#FidelityToTolkien


Solicitr
Gondor


Fri, 4:55pm

Post #210 of 219 (298 views)
Shortcut
Well, [In reply to] Can't Post

I would have hoped that any film of Tolkien's work would be aimed at a somewhat higher intellectual plane than Transformers.


Chen G.
Rohan

Fri, 6:12pm

Post #211 of 219 (290 views)
Shortcut
There, I agree with ya [In reply to] Can't Post

 


skyofcoffeebeans
Lorien

Fri, 8:55pm

Post #212 of 219 (273 views)
Shortcut
Agreed. These aren't the same things at all [In reply to] Can't Post

And I don't care if the general audience doesn't care. It looks dumb.

One doesn't have to reach quite this far to depend the worst parts of these movies. It's ok to like the Hobbit movies and admit that some parts are not that great.


Chen G.
Rohan

Fri, 10:04pm

Post #213 of 219 (262 views)
Shortcut
Exactly [In reply to] Can't Post

The key is not losing the forest for the trees.


Paulo Gabriel
Lorien

Sat, 1:22am

Post #214 of 219 (238 views)
Shortcut
I do ''admit'' that... [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
And I don't care if the general audience doesn't care. It looks dumb.

One doesn't have to reach quite this far to depend the worst parts of these movies. It's ok to like the Hobbit movies and admit that some parts are not that great.


...yet I see nothing ''dumb'' about this, especially as the same has been done in the earlier trilogy, which is ironically so ''acclaimed'', by, and I quote, ''people who apparently have never seen a decent adaptation or a decent war movie''.

Re the first point: ''Now, there are all kinds of technical and logistical problems in the sequence, such as how Viggo, Orlando, and John got from Dunharrow to Umbar without any horses (unlike the books, all the horses run away and don't come back) but I suppose if Elrond can ride across mountains and hundreds of miles in a day or so, then they can run all the way to the coast in a couple hours. (Or they borrow zombie horses, I guess.) But those are really inconsequential, compared to the big problem at the center. And that is that there are no living Men to be rallied, no villagers, no fisherfolk, no POWs to free from the oars of the Corsairs' dromonds, no local lord to bring his own soldiers to the aid of Gondor — none of the rest of the people whose absence Pippin's companions in Gondor didn't lament after the arrival of allies which didn't happen in the movie. So, since they couldn't handle the politics of Middle-earth, J/B/W were forced to come up with some other solution to the problem. And that was to make the Dead utterly mundane''.


(This post was edited by Paulo Gabriel on Sat, 1:23am)


Solicitr
Gondor


Sat, 5:08am

Post #215 of 219 (218 views)
Shortcut
Well, [In reply to] Can't Post

There are gradations. As in "dumb" and "dumber."


Paulo Gabriel
Lorien

Sat, 9:12am

Post #216 of 219 (189 views)
Shortcut
I would argue... [In reply to] Can't Post

that there is a point in which it becomes so ''dumb'' (by this definition, anyway) that there is no point in ''scaling'' it. Does it matter whether a 20 kg weight is dropped from a height of 100 or 200 metres on someone’s head? It will kill him either way.


(This post was edited by Paulo Gabriel on Sat, 9:13am)


The Dude
Bree

Sat, 11:52am

Post #217 of 219 (164 views)
Shortcut
Very odd debating style [In reply to] Can't Post

Last time I looked you were a defender of "The Hobbit" films. Your line of argument here seems to be that "nothing dumb" exists in those films (1) but if it did it would exist in equal measure in the "LotR" trilogy (2), so everyone who prefers the latter over the former must then be a hypocrite (3).

Well, accusation of hypocrisy on their own always form a weak basis to build as the foundation of one’s case; whether it comes to political, cultural, or philosophical arguments. Criticizing the “LotR” films for dumbing down things does not really help the “Hobbit” films in any way. And I would not call solicitr a huge fan of the original trilogy to begin with, so you basically arguing against a strawman here.

The point where we have to agree to disagree, it seems, is you believe that there is no difference whatsoever in the frequency and quality of slapstick/dumb scenes between the original trilogy and “the Hobbit” films, whereas others (solicitr and me included) consider this to be slightly reductive.

PS: Aragorn and the Grey Company never made it to Umbar. Their destination was Pelagir.


skyofcoffeebeans
Lorien

Sat, 8:08pm

Post #218 of 219 (130 views)
Shortcut
I would argue that [In reply to] Can't Post

There is no degree of comparison in the absurdity of Legolas defying gravity via falling blocks onscreen vs the offscreen travels of other characters on horseback or on foot. It is an untenable point to make and an absurd basis for a defense of what is almost objectively a very low point, if not the lowest point, in Peter Jackson’s filmography.

We don’t have to love everything about the things we love. It’s ok for there to be flaws. I don’t see you defending your love for Legolas defying gravity, just tearing apart the validity of other people’s opinions of it.


Noria
Gondor

12:35pm

Post #219 of 219 (8 views)
Shortcut
As I said above, [In reply to] Can't Post

In LotR, both book and movie, Legolas is able to walk on top of deep snow without sinking, just one of the things about Elves that defy the laws of nature that we know. Tolkien wrote them that way.

So, why should the laws of gravity, already contravened in the case of snow, apply strictly anywhere else where an Elf is concerned?

With those qualities of Elves lurking in the back of my mind, I had no difficulty accepting Legolas’ stunt with the falling stones. Like most of his feats, it amused me.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page Last page  View All
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.