|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smaug the iron
Gondor
Apr 23 2015, 4:29pm
Post #1 of 7
(1191 views)
Shortcut
|
From the Shire to rivendell
|
Can't Post
|
|
in the Hobbit vs Lord of the rings which version is are closer to the book.
|
|
|
Mooseboy018
Grey Havens
Apr 23 2015, 5:46pm
Post #2 of 7
(1113 views)
Shortcut
|
That's actually kind of a hard question. The Hobbit adds quite a lot, and The Lord of the Rings cuts out a lot.
|
|
|
dormouse
Half-elven
Apr 23 2015, 6:11pm
Post #3 of 7
(1096 views)
Shortcut
|
Each is close in its own way...
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
...and different in its own way.
|
|
|
BlackFox
Half-elven
Apr 24 2015, 8:35am
Post #5 of 7
(876 views)
Shortcut
|
I like having both the book and the movies in my life. Why choose when you can have both?
(This post was edited by BlackFox on Apr 24 2015, 8:43am)
|
|
|
MyWeeLadGimli
Lorien
Apr 26 2015, 4:00am
Post #7 of 7
(714 views)
Shortcut
|
For that particular stage of the journey, the Hobbit films basically see the Company doing the same things (Bilbo forgets his handkerchief, Gandalf disappears, captured by trolls, finding the swords). The only real change to the plot is the addition of the Warg chase. With LOTR, we lose everything with the Old Forest, Tom Bombadil, the Barrow-Wights. The time in Bree is significantly truncated, with elements like Gandalf's letter and Bill Ferny left out altogether. Also Merry and Pippin's role in the journey was changed quite a bit from book to film.
|
|
|
|
|