Our Sponsor Sideshow Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Hobbit:
This Irish stone bridge in forest would have been perfect

Eruonen
Half-elven


Mar 2 2015, 12:26am

Post #1 of 9 (1322 views)
Shortcut
This Irish stone bridge in forest would have been perfect Can't Post

for Mirkwood or one of the Elven entrances.....

https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/...d36cca88d0d452349ffe


(This post was edited by Eruonen on Mar 2 2015, 12:27am)


balbo biggins
Rohan


Mar 2 2015, 1:29am

Post #2 of 9 (1250 views)
Shortcut
nice [In reply to] Can't Post

i would love to see a middle earth film actually shot in the uk and parts of europe. though i love new zealands landscapes in the films, sometimes you just want to see a nice english oak tree! some real shires and some real ruins!


Brethil
Half-elven


Mar 2 2015, 1:55am

Post #3 of 9 (1234 views)
Shortcut
What a beautiful location. // [In reply to] Can't Post

 








Eruonen
Half-elven


Mar 2 2015, 2:24am

Post #4 of 9 (1225 views)
Shortcut
True, some of those distinct features that are not native to NZ would have been nice. [In reply to] Can't Post

 


(This post was edited by Eruonen on Mar 2 2015, 2:31am)


ElendilTheShort
Gondor


Mar 2 2015, 5:37am

Post #5 of 9 (1164 views)
Shortcut
I like it...I like it a lot. [In reply to] Can't Post

Conveys ancientry and it proves that real structures look a lot better than CGI versions


moreorless
Gondor

Mar 4 2015, 1:50am

Post #6 of 9 (886 views)
Shortcut
The "British but not" look worked well for me.. [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
i would love to see a middle earth film actually shot in the uk and parts of europe. though i love new zealands landscapes in the films, sometimes you just want to see a nice english oak tree! some real shires and some real ruins!


I'v always thought that NZ worked well as a location because it has that sense of being similar to the UK but subtly different.

Where I think the UK would have been a good location is if the first half of FOTR had the same kind of detail and slow pace of the book. The sense of the everyday landscape with subtle hints at ancient history and magic. To achieve that though you'd probably have needed to spilt FOTR into two films.

You could I spose argue that a "bridge" film or something based on the war with Angmar might be better suited to filming in the UK or Europe as it would be featuring a similar kind of landscape.


dormouse
Half-elven


Mar 4 2015, 10:02am

Post #7 of 9 (855 views)
Shortcut
Me too [In reply to] Can't Post

While my heart says that it would have been good to see the film shot here in the UK - mythology for England, and all that - I think New Zealand really worked better in the end. I love the British Isles and we have some very beautiful places, but the 'history in the landscape' which we have in shedloads, is all very recognisable history tied to obvious periods of our past - Roman walls, Norman castles. For me those things would have been off-putting: I'd have known what they were. It's also a more crowded landscape - you can't go far without seeing a road or a pylon or some other evidence of now.

The New Zealand landscapes used in the films were similar and yet had that otherness about them - and everything on a grander scale - higher mountains, broader sweeps of uninhabited land. It was right for a myth.


moreorless
Gondor

Mar 4 2015, 11:47am

Post #8 of 9 (842 views)
Shortcut
Certainly right for the kinds of films Jackson made... [In reply to] Can't Post


In Reply To
While my heart says that it would have been good to see the film shot here in the UK - mythology for England, and all that - I think New Zealand really worked better in the end. I love the British Isles and we have some very beautiful places, but the 'history in the landscape' which we have in shedloads, is all very recognisable history tied to obvious periods of our past - Roman walls, Norman castles. For me those things would have been off-putting: I'd have known what they were. It's also a more crowded landscape - you can't go far without seeing a road or a pylon or some other evidence of now.

The New Zealand landscapes used in the films were similar and yet had that otherness about them - and everything on a grander scale - higher mountains, broader sweeps of uninhabited land. It was right for a myth.


Jacksons versions of both LOTR and the Hobbit focused quiet heavily on wild landscape and didn't look to take realism to extremes.

Again I would say if you had a story that focused more on Arnor as a location I could see the advantage of the UK or Ireland. Less so using castles/bridges and more the form of the landscape, the sense that its been shaped by human/hobbit hands over thousands of years.


swordwhale
Tol Eressea


Mar 4 2015, 9:51pm

Post #9 of 9 (803 views)
Shortcut
nice!// [In reply to] Can't Post

 

Na 'Aear, na 'Aear! Mýl 'lain nallol, I sûl ribiel a i falf 'loss reviol...
To the sea, to the sea, the white gulls are crying, the wind is blowing and the white foam is flying...




 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.