|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frodo Baggins
Bree
Nov 13 2014, 9:03pm
Post #1 of 14
(1306 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Confirmed run time BOF5A??
|
Can't Post
|
|
On the Cineworld website it is stated the runtime is 160 mins.
http://www.cineworld.co.uk/...all&sort=default
So is this the definite time or not?? On the past two occasions they have had the runtimes correct. If it correct then is it slightly longer than DOS and just a tad shorter than AUJ???
|
|
|
Arannir
Valinor
Nov 13 2014, 9:14pm
Post #2 of 14
(744 views)
Shortcut
|
... credits and trailers/commercials?
That would place it back to 142 again.
"I am afraid it is only too likely to be true what you say about the critics and the public. I am dreading the publication for it will be impossible not to mind what is said. I have exposed my heart to be shot at." J.R.R. Tolkien
We all have our hearts and minds one way or another invested in these books and movies. So we all mind and should show the necessary respect.
|
|
|
Carne
Tol Eressea
Nov 13 2014, 9:19pm
Post #3 of 14
(691 views)
Shortcut
|
|
SF Norway has it listed at 142 minutes
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
And so does SF Sweden.
|
|
|
Cirashala
Valinor
Nov 13 2014, 9:22pm
Post #6 of 14
(702 views)
Shortcut
|
in my theater, including credits and previews, was 2h 50 min, with nearly the last 20 min being credits. After the first or second showing, thanks to me needing to get back due to relieving a babysitter, I didn't sit through the credits. And I would leave at the half hour mark, whereas before I had left at the ten mins til mark.
So I believe that DOS in my theater seemed to be about 20 minutes of just credits or so- I could be wrong and can go back to check (or watch the end credits on my copy) but I remember thinking that they were unusually long...no surprise, given how many people worked on this film and how many locations were used!
Of course, if BO5A ends up being a total time (including credits) of 2:22, and the credits are as long as what I remember from DOS, then we're looking at only a two hour movie  So I for one hope this time, if accurate, DOESN'T include credits!
Or, if it does, that the EE more than makes up for it! One can only hope....
|
|
|
Aragorn the Elfstone
Tol Eressea
Nov 13 2014, 9:24pm
Post #7 of 14
(716 views)
Shortcut
|
|
My local cinema has it as 155 min.
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Really, it's anyone's guess until the thing is locked and starts screening. For the next couple weeks, it's going to be a fool's errand to try and figure out anything definite.
"The danger with any movie that does as well as this one does is that the amount of money it's making and the number of awards that it's got becomes almost more important than the movie itself in people's minds. I look at that as, in a sense, being very much like the Ring, and its effect on people. You know, you can kind of forget what we were doing, if you get too wrapped up in that."
- Viggo Mortensen
|
|
|
macfalk
Valinor
Nov 13 2014, 9:34pm
Post #8 of 14
(660 views)
Shortcut
|
Most indications points to a running time shorter than anyone would have expected a few months ago (2:10-2:25). The fact that PJ said that he is cutting it down to get a "thriller" feel adds fuel to this fire.
The greatest adventure is what lies ahead.
|
|
|
dubulous
Rohan
Nov 13 2014, 9:49pm
Post #9 of 14
(608 views)
Shortcut
|
The Finnish distributer also states 2h 22 minutes, which is the same as 142 mins.
I'm not sure, but I think it might be the runtime without the credits (This is purely speculative calculation based on comparing my experiences with other movies that are currently running - for example the same theatre gives a runtime of 2 hours and 49 minutes for Interstellar. I sat in the theatre for a little over three hours, watching the 10-15 minutes of commercials and not staying for credits, which leaves the 2hrs 49mins for the movie alone.)
|
|
|
DjU
Lorien
Nov 13 2014, 10:45pm
Post #10 of 14
(553 views)
Shortcut
|
So I believe that DOS in my theater seemed to be about 20 minutes of just credits or so- I could be wrong and can go back to check. No credits have ever been 20 minutes.
The credits for AUJ & DOS are both just a smidge over 10 minutes.
AUJ - 10 Minutes 11 Seconds
DOS - 10 Minutes 27 Seconds
They are however well over 2 minutes longer than the LotR ones.
[FotR; 7m42s - TTT; 7m44s - RotK; 8m45s]
|
|
|
DjU
Lorien
Nov 13 2014, 10:54pm
Post #11 of 14
(538 views)
Shortcut
|
The Finnish distributer also states 2h 22 minutes, which is the same as 142 mins.
I'm not sure, but I think it might be the runtime without the credits (This is purely speculative calculation based on comparing my experiences with other movies that are currently running - for example the same theatre gives a runtime of 2 hours and 49 minutes for Interstellar. I sat in the theatre for a little over three hours, watching the 10-15 minutes of commercials and not staying for credits, which leaves the 2hrs 49mins for the movie alone.)
2 hours 49 minutes (168m 49s as rated at the BBFC) is the length of Interstellar - and that will be WITH credits. Credits are part of the movie, they are not an optional extra.
It is 99.99% likely that if 142 is the true length of BOTFA then that is INCLUSIVE of credits.
|
|
|
Arannir
Valinor
Nov 13 2014, 10:58pm
Post #12 of 14
(522 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Yes, Interstellar has this length only with the credits.
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Nothing official yet, of course, but 2 hours and 12 minutes runtime before credits is pretty likely right now.
"I am afraid it is only too likely to be true what you say about the critics and the public. I am dreading the publication for it will be impossible not to mind what is said. I have exposed my heart to be shot at." J.R.R. Tolkien
We all have our hearts and minds one way or another invested in these books and movies. So we all mind and should show the necessary respect.
|
|
|
dubulous
Rohan
Nov 13 2014, 11:05pm
Post #13 of 14
(505 views)
Shortcut
|
|
As I said, I'm just speculating based on my own experience
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
That could be the case. I'm only mentioning what I experienced myself. When I saw Interstellar, the commercials started 10.30 am and I was out about 1.30 pm - commercials went on for about 10 minutes in the beginning, I did not stay for the credits. That would leave the 2 hrs 49 mins for the movie without the credits, but that was just my experience. I only happen to remember the times pretty well because I was going to work afterwards and had to watch out for not being late. But yeah...I don't know. I can easily be wrong.
2 hours 49 minutes (168m 49s as rated at the BBFC) is the length of Interstellar - and that will be WITH credits. Credits are part of the movie, they are not an optional extra.
It is 99.99% likely that if 142 is the true length of BOTFA then that is INCLUSIVE of credits.
(This post was edited by dubulous on Nov 13 2014, 11:15pm)
|
|
|
Arannir
Valinor
Nov 13 2014, 11:24pm
Post #14 of 14
(481 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Yes, it is easy to get that stiff wrong..
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
... I am unsure most of the times as well, especially when it comes to commercials.
But in the case of Interstellar I coincidentally know that the 169 is with credits.
"I am afraid it is only too likely to be true what you say about the critics and the public. I am dreading the publication for it will be impossible not to mind what is said. I have exposed my heart to be shot at." J.R.R. Tolkien
We all have our hearts and minds one way or another invested in these books and movies. So we all mind and should show the necessary respect.
|
|
|
|
|
