Our Sponsor Sideshow Collectibles Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net?
Consider a donation!

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Hobbit:
The sad part is...

Sinister71
Tol Eressea


May 18 2013, 2:01am


Views: 284
Shortcut
The sad part is... [In reply to] Can't Post

only 11 or 12 pages of those appendices have anything to do with the Hobbit.Wink THAT is the sad part of Jackson's statement, he keeps on hammering on about using the appendices material. And then the material they DID use they totally changed, to not resemble what was in the actual appendices. Hmmmmmm makes sense to me. Crazy

Well Never mind it makes completely NO sense whatsoeverTongue

11 or 12 pages is a far cry from 125, or at least I think it is.

That "something else" is a bunch of fan fiction made up by Jackson, Walsh, and Boyens. Unsure


(This post was edited by sinister71 on May 18 2013, 2:04am)

Subject User Time
Why didn't they state in the credits The Movie was partly based/'inspired' by addtional material taken from LOTR and its appendices? malickfan Send a private message to malickfan May 17 2013, 6:09pm
    Short answer... Darkstone Send a private message to Darkstone May 17 2013, 6:45pm
        Fair enough I guess that makes sense... malickfan Send a private message to malickfan May 17 2013, 7:11pm
            er? jimmyfenn Send a private message to jimmyfenn May 17 2013, 7:19pm
                Even Cate Blanchett describes the movies as "The Hobbit...and something else" Eleniel Send a private message to Eleniel May 17 2013, 9:56pm
                    interesting interviews Dwarvenfury Send a private message to Dwarvenfury May 18 2013, 1:43am
                        Tolkien rewrote a couple chapters Sinister71 Send a private message to Sinister71 May 18 2013, 2:13am
                            well that's curious. Dwarvenfury Send a private message to Dwarvenfury May 18 2013, 2:50am
                            The 2 Chapters from the 1960's rewrite is defintitely worth reading (The History of The Hobbit is more than equal to the HOME)... malickfan Send a private message to malickfan May 18 2013, 7:28pm
                    The sad part is... Sinister71 Send a private message to Sinister71 May 18 2013, 2:01am
                        I swear just as much of the additional materil was actually taken from sources other than the appendices. malickfan Send a private message to malickfan May 18 2013, 7:57pm
                            Minor corrections Otaku-sempai Send a private message to Otaku-sempai May 18 2013, 8:30pm
                            And major correction DwellerInDale Send a private message to DwellerInDale May 19 2013, 6:34am
                                Bolg Yngwulff Send a private message to Yngwulff May 19 2013, 8:08am
                                Yes but Compare that to the version in Peoples: malickfan Send a private message to malickfan May 20 2013, 8:39am

 
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.