
|
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net? Consider a donation!
|
|
 |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Eleniel
Rohan

Dec 30 2012, 11:11pm
Views: 221
Shortcut
|
|
I would say that sums up my experience, too..
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Having seen AUJ in 3D at both 24 and 48 fps, even though I have previously enjoyed other films in 3D (most recently Deathly Hallows II) I have to say that it is the 3D which was the overriding problem for me, too... What really distracted me was the 3D. The absolutely lifelike realism had a problematic side effect: I found myself wanting to see things in the background like I would in a theater, but I could not because the camera was focused on what was in the foreground, leaving the things I wanted to see in the background out of focus in a way that felt unrealistic in the otherwise realistic world on the screen. There were so many beautiful high resolution details on the screen that I had trouble paying attention to the big picture. This made the 3D a terrible distraction, and I really only enjoyed it in the "theme park ride" scenes like falling down into Goblin town, or the really action-heavy battle scenes where it made it easier to see who was hitting what from where. Otherwise I found myself closing one eye and trying to watch it that way for a minute or two, and wishing they had made a 48 fps version in 2D so that I could see the more lifelike motion without the distraction of the 3D. For me the HFR was a separate issue...I disliked the feeling of almost being "on stage with the actors", and the clarity combined with the startling depth of field only served to heighten my perception of "unreality" whilst watching. the only time I enjoyed the HFR I would say was in the Goblin Town sequences where it was amazing to be able to pick out the detail all the way into the further point from the camera. Conversely, I didn't like that feel with the landscape shots so much, particularly with layers of foliage, which to the naked eye would be more blurry, and not crystal clear through several layers. When it came to watching the 48 fps version, I would get a different feel from different scenes. Sometimes I felt like I was watching a big budget TV miniseries. Sometimes it felt like theater in the round. Sometimes I just didn't notice. I am yet to see AUJ in 2D, which I aim to rectify shortly, with the hope that it will match the cinematic feel we experienced during LotR more closely...
"Choosing Trust over Doubt gets me burned once in a while, but I'd rather be singed than hardened." ¯ Victoria Monfort
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
Q for those who have seen both 24 and 48 versions
|
acheron
|
Dec 30 2012, 6:10pm
|
In all honesty, after seeing the IMAX HFR 3D version last night
|
Eruonen
|
Dec 30 2012, 6:20pm
|
Same for me
|
Lily Fairbairn
|
Dec 30 2012, 6:26pm
|
Which scenes do you mean?
|
DanielLB
|
Dec 30 2012, 6:20pm
|
I'll let you know when I see it again :)
|
acheron
|
Dec 31 2012, 2:28am
|
I don't recall any problems with 24fps 2D...
|
Carcharoth
|
Dec 30 2012, 7:40pm
|
I noticed a few things
|
guitarzankansasfan
|
Dec 30 2012, 7:43pm
|
I would say that sums up my experience, too..
|
Eleniel
|
Dec 30 2012, 11:11pm
|
Not sure what you mean
|
Lightice
|
Dec 30 2012, 8:54pm
|
We're in the same boat here...
|
sharpened_graphite
|
Dec 30 2012, 9:32pm
|
Agreed.
|
Joe-Mathews
|
Dec 30 2012, 9:49pm
|
I can say for certain that I didn't like the 3D...
|
sharpened_graphite
|
Dec 30 2012, 10:24pm
|
We could go round in circles .... ;-) /
|
DanielLB
|
Dec 30 2012, 9:46pm
|
I didn't like the high frame rate
|
Randraug
|
Dec 31 2012, 2:46am
|
Seen both formats
|
Old Toby
|
Dec 31 2012, 4:30am
|
Location
|
JWPlatt
|
Dec 31 2012, 5:51am
|
where you sit depends on several things
|
Old Toby
|
Dec 31 2012, 3:52pm
|
|
|
|