|
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net? Consider a donation!
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sauget.diblosio
Gondor
Dec 4 2012, 11:32am
Views: 382
Shortcut
|
...that they did review screenings in 48 fps. Seems like an unwise move to me. Why would you potentially hinder these important early reviews with a "controversial", unproven new technology? A lot of these reviews are overly concerned with it's presentation, and not the movie itself or the story. Reviewers are understandably distracted from the movie, and focusing way too much of their attention on this mostly trivial, to the general audience anyway, technical matter. I really think this is going to bite them in the you-know-what-- most people would never even have heard of 48 fps otherwise. They just want to know if the movie's any good, and are gonna be scared away by this scary new technology that they would have to go way out of their way to see anyway. Makes no sense to me at all.
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
How is The Hobbit possible with '' too much'' CGI ?
|
Gusev8
|
Dec 4 2012, 9:57am
|
The only review
|
Gusev8
|
Dec 4 2012, 10:09am
|
|
to everyone hyperventilating over reviews...Relax...
|
nobofthepony
|
Dec 4 2012, 10:56am
|
|
agree with all you are saying
|
Balrogslunch
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:12am
|
|
I'm kind of surprised
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:32am
|
|
completely agree...
|
nobofthepony
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:36am
|
|
I hope DOS
|
Wordofmask
|
Dec 4 2012, 1:46pm
|
|
It's the way forward
|
DanielLB
|
Dec 4 2012, 1:59pm
|
|
a point to remember.....
|
Balrogslunch
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:40am
|
|
Thank you
|
Lindele
|
Dec 4 2012, 4:34pm
|
|
Reviews seemed balanced
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Dec 4 2012, 5:23pm
|
|
Yeah, its' about 75% on the tomatometer
|
totoro
|
Dec 5 2012, 4:41am
|
|
|
|
