|
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net? Consider a donation!
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamfast Gamgee
Rohan
Nov 20 2012, 11:26pm
Views: 144
Shortcut
|
He does always, at least in the Hobbit, seem to be a slight afterthought of a character. Initially, he serves only as a device to get Gandalf out of the tale for a while. And it seems to me hat his defeat was only mentioned as a afterthought as well. Defeated, but not destroyed. It would have been just as easy, in the context of the Hobbit to have said that the Necromancer was killed. In which case, how would Tolkien have written his sequel? Said something like, 'Did I say the Necromancer was killed? I was wrong, I'm afraid he came back!' Or maybe have a new enemy entirely, an Orc-lord, or maybe a bad Elf even! Or possibly Tolkien had a possible sequel in mind all along when he wrote the tale so he kept his options option!
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
The Last Stage, part V - Prophecies and Providence
|
sador
|
Nov 20 2012, 7:33pm
|
The Necromancer
|
Hamfast Gamgee
|
Nov 20 2012, 11:26pm
|
|
In The Hobbit alone, you are right.
|
sador
|
Nov 22 2012, 3:53pm
|
|
The name of the Necromancer
|
FarFromHome
|
Nov 24 2012, 5:43pm
|
|
But I thought
|
sador
|
Nov 25 2012, 9:11am
|
|
That's the odd thing.
|
FarFromHome
|
Nov 25 2012, 10:52am
|
|
prophecy, providence and pforesight
|
telain
|
Nov 22 2012, 6:22pm
|
|
True or false viviosns?
|
sador
|
Nov 23 2012, 10:48am
|
|
Both no and yes...
|
FarFromHome
|
Nov 24 2012, 5:13pm
|
|
Thank you!
|
sador
|
Nov 25 2012, 9:52am
|
|
Thank you for the excellent summary
|
FarFromHome
|
Nov 25 2012, 3:53pm
|
|
Gandalf had a lotta splainin' to do!
|
squire
|
Dec 1 2012, 8:11pm
|
|
The Hobbit a train wreck as a prequel to Lotr?????????????
|
Hamfast Gamgee
|
Dec 4 2012, 12:21am
|
|
Thanks for a wonderful post!
|
Ardamírë
|
Dec 3 2012, 9:15pm
|
|
|
|
