
|
|
 |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

CuriousG
Half-elven

Fri, 4:53pm
Post #26 of 34
(33 views)
Shortcut
|
|
The Ent police are coming for you and your hasty ways; they should arrive about 4026 or so. //
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
|
|
|

CuriousG
Half-elven

Fri, 5:00pm
Post #27 of 34
(33 views)
Shortcut
|
|
It's always a good day when there's a link to Orwell. Such a great mind and writer. //
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
|
|
|

noWizardme
Half-elven

Fri, 5:26pm
Post #28 of 34
(34 views)
Shortcut
|
The suspense will probably kill me! :)
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
You've got to change your hasty ways... NoWiz Before I stop reading you You've got to change... NoWiz And every word that I say is true Now I'm entstridin' and hiding All over the wood And my mates Merry and Pippin Say that ain't good This can't go on... Lord knows you got to change... with apologies to Carlos Santana At Woodstock. Hmmm - never knew he played gig in Oxfordshire...
~~~~~~ "I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.
|
|
|

Voronwë_the_Faithful
Valinor
Fri, 5:26pm
Post #29 of 34
(33 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Yavanna standing like a tree under heaven
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I love that image so much that it was one that I asked to have illustrated for my book -- the only one of a scene that was not omitted from the published Silmarillion (and Anushka did an amazing job of capturing how I always imagined that image).
'But very bright were the stars upon the margin of the world, when at times the clouds about the West were drawn aside.' The Hall of Fire
|
|
|

CuriousG
Half-elven

Fri, 8:14pm
Post #30 of 34
(30 views)
Shortcut
|
I like how Yavanna's description encapsulates Tolkien's greatest, most persistent loves in a single sentence: trees, light, music [winds of Manwe], stars [heaven], water/sea/Ulmo, and fertility contrasted with barrenness.
|
|
|

noWizardme
Half-elven

Sat, 3:56pm
Post #31 of 34
(26 views)
Shortcut
|
As if our existing list of utterly unanswerable questions were not enough, how do we see dragons in terms of potential autonomy from the local Dark Lord? Tolkien voices Smaug (and I think Glaurung in Children of Hurin, but my copy is not to hand) in a very different way to his orc talk. Dragons sound articulate, educated. Orcs, on the other hand: I think it would be consistent with the text to imagine that if a dog has four thoughts, one for each paw (food, food, food, sex) an orc might have a similarly limited repertoire (violence, revenge, violence, food, perhaps). ...
...Now writing that immediately makes me want to imagine to contrary just for fun. Orcs who are right old intellectuals in private, a bit like the cameo played by Alice Cooper and his band in Wayne's World. Who can tell? But since that would have to rely entirely on supposition of things that happen beyond the text, it doesn't make for anything other than the weakest of theories. ...
...So, it's easy (for me) and consistent with the text to imagine orcs as having "a mind that's weak and a back that's strong"...
-- as the song goes, played by ZZ Top and Jeff Beck here Well, bless my beard! Frank Beard is the one playing the drums by the way. He does not have a beard. And nor is he my beard. Which is confusing, but not relevant in any way, come to think of it... But dragons! I wanted to talk about dragons. Smaug: his potential as an ally of Sauron is something Gandalf is thinking about according to Quest of Erebor (whether or not Tolkien had thought any such thing on Gandallf's behalf when he wrote TH). But, I think, 'ally' in that evil folk/psychopathic way that everyone is trying to use everyone else and the whole thing will break down as soon as betrayal is more appealing than co-operation to one of the parties. I don't get the sense that Smaug just thinks he's independent of Sauron but isn’t really. Glaurung, now. Ally of Melkor, or something more like an instrument of Melkor with limited/no independence? That is, do we see Glaurung as potentially free to decide to have a fascinating chat with Turin instead - about the issues of rendering haiku in elvish say. Or is he bound to behave as Melkor wishes unless Melkor loses control for some reason in what you might call a reptile dysfunction.
For bonus points discuss whether it is likely that Melkor is suffering from a reptile dysfunction, and whether he should just go and talk to his doctor or pharmacist in confidence.
~~~~~~ "I am not made for querulous pests." Frodo 'Spooner' Baggins.
|
|
|

CuriousG
Half-elven

Sat, 6:44pm
Post #32 of 34
(17 views)
Shortcut
|
which, of course, is short for Spotify. Spot has four paws: Kpop, Reggae, Rap, and The Beatles. Spot doesn't fetch sticks or bark at strangers; he makes new playlists for clubs on Ibiza. Wiz doesn't need to feed Spot; he just plays 8-track tapes for him. Spot shows no interest in reruns of "Lassie" or "Scooby-Do," but he's wags his tail at the Grammys and barks to vote. That's Spot.
|
|
|

CuriousG
Half-elven

Sat, 7:39pm
Post #33 of 34
(12 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Reptile loyalty and agency, or dysfunction
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Glaurung: so I remember from The Sil, and Tolkien Gateway cites Children of Hurin on the same point, that he set himself up as Which says a lot about agency. Not: "Morgoth set him up as dragon-king," and not "Sauron came to Nargothrond on an errand from their mutual lord Morgoth, urging Glaurung to rule Nargothrond as dragon-king and gather many orcs to himself." Nope, he does it himself. At the same time, I'm back to "what can readers credibly imagine him doing," and I don't see him becoming "Dragon-Emperor of Beleriand, gathering Sauron and other dragons and balrogs to him and making war on Angband." I mean, he could! But it seems within the legendarium, Morgoth never faces a credible threat to depose him by an underling, and neither does Sauron, and they're the only two Big Bads we have for ages at a time. So I think the rules of a Tolkien Dark Lord is that they don't allow much agency to their underlings, never enough to challenge them for power, though they can wreak havoc on their own. Glaurung as Dragon-King was a menace to Doriath and any Elf-Man resistance in western Beleriand, so he was furthering Morgoth's goals. Which is probably why Orcs readily agreed to follow him. It still seems with Smaug that Sauron couldn't take him for granted: he might have to negotiate with him and offer him something for an attack on Rivendell or Minas Tirith. But I'd stick with the idea that both sides know how asymmetrical the relationship is: kinda like Italy asking Malta to do something.
|
|
|

CuriousG
Half-elven

Sat, 8:21pm
Post #34 of 34
(10 views)
Shortcut
|
|
2 exceptions: Ungoliant and Saruman
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
They are outliers, but I'll still account for them as challengers to the Dark Lord. 1. Ungoliant wasn't a direct servant of Morgoth's and instead a free agent. She seemed the junior partner in their crime spree, until swallowing all the jewels made her more powerful, so naturally she challenged him. But Balrogs showed up, and she disappeared and moved on, not setting up a realm to rival and unseat Morgoth. 2. Saruman, if he could get the One Ring, would have gone from Sauron-servant to Sauron-rival, so he's an exception, but he didn't start as a Sauron-servant, and we never saw the rivalry take place. Though it's suggested it would have.
‘It is a pity that our friends lie in between,’ said Gimli. ‘If no land divided Isengard and Mordor, then they could fight while we watched and waited.’ ‘The victor would emerge stronger than either, and free from doubt,’ said Gandalf. ‘But Isengard cannot fight Mordor, unless Saruman first obtains the Ring.'
|
|
|
|
|