|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lembas_muncher
The Shire
May 17 2013, 7:12pm
Views: 1902
Shortcut
|
|
'The Eye' on the next Hobbit Films?
|
Can't Post
|
|
Hmm, I was thinking about this lately and been wondering if this is plausible enough to be included as a scene.. I'm particulary excited to see how PJ plays out the Battle of Dol Goldur, the Necromancer himself will speak! ...and possibly exchanging dialogues with the Council before battling? (really looking forward to this since we never get to see Sauron kick ass in LOTR, well he did on the prologue but i want more of him fleshed out as a character :)..Now, he will sure be defeated in ways which are yet unknown to us, and we know he will flee the fortress in wraith/shadow form maybe? (again excited for PJ's take on this)..Now, my question is, will it still be effective if PJ includes a scene where we see the defeated Necromancer taking flight towards Barad-dur, and then we see it's interior, the Necromancer reshaping again to a more Sauron-like figure (but not yet in full physical form), he then heats up, becomes a great ball of fire and then jolts up to the top of the tower, and then we see how 'the Eye' ignites for the first time, wreathed in its full-flame glory. Wow, apologies for this absurdity, I know the timelines will be messed up haha :)..but on a serious note, is it plausible if we see this scene at the end credit of TABA, and then Gollum sees the flaming Eye from afar, and then a panning wide shot of him treading towards Barad-dur.
(This post was edited by lembas_muncher on May 17 2013, 7:14pm)
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
'The Eye' on the next Hobbit Films?
|
lembas_muncher
|
May 17 2013, 7:12pm
|
maybe..but not quite
|
elevorn
|
May 17 2013, 7:17pm
|
|
Nice..
|
lembas_muncher
|
May 17 2013, 7:24pm
|
|
No Eye, please!
|
Elizabeth
|
May 17 2013, 7:59pm
|
|
why would they need their own identity?
|
elevorn
|
May 17 2013, 8:02pm
|
|
a hunch
|
Tinkerbell
|
May 17 2013, 11:20pm
|
|
That's the mistake too many sequels and prequels take.
|
Elizabeth
|
May 17 2013, 11:48pm
|
|
Agree with BOTH these statements
|
Sinister71
|
May 18 2013, 2:39am
|
|
Totally agree with that
|
Glorfindela
|
May 18 2013, 10:13am
|
|
this!
|
There&ThereAgain
|
May 19 2013, 6:25pm
|
|
I'd love anything Sauron related!
|
The Mitch King
|
May 17 2013, 8:45pm
|
|
An odd impression of Sauron
|
Glorfindela
|
May 17 2013, 10:32pm
|
|
That's actually fairly accurate.
|
Elizabeth
|
May 17 2013, 11:51pm
|
|
hmm..
|
lembas_muncher
|
May 18 2013, 2:09am
|
|
Yes!
|
lembas_muncher
|
May 18 2013, 2:16am
|
|
It was shot, but not finished.
|
Elizabeth
|
May 18 2013, 7:48am
|
|
A better explanation of the Eye
|
micha84
|
May 18 2013, 8:30am
|
|
Good one
|
lembas_muncher
|
May 18 2013, 10:50am
|
|
I would personally prefer...
|
dik-dik
|
May 18 2013, 11:41am
|
|
Dol Guldur is not a victory.
|
Bumblingidiot
|
May 18 2013, 1:57pm
|
|
Yes, that's why I said 'partial victory'.
|
dik-dik
|
May 18 2013, 5:58pm
|
|
BO5A
|
Yngwulff
|
May 19 2013, 8:19am
|
|
Very true...
|
dik-dik
|
May 19 2013, 8:34am
|
|
Maybe as long as 60 years :-)
|
Elizabeth
|
May 19 2013, 8:36am
|
|
yuppers!
|
Yngwulff
|
May 19 2013, 8:52am
|
|
hmm
|
lembas_muncher
|
May 18 2013, 2:03pm
|
|
I wonder...
|
The Mitch King
|
May 18 2013, 5:52pm
|
|
I'd be fine with both...
|
dik-dik
|
May 18 2013, 6:02pm
|
|
We should not see "The Eye" unless (minor spoiler)...
|
Otaku-sempai
|
May 18 2013, 8:12pm
|
|
Well, maybe this could be an opportunity...
|
Bauglir100
|
May 20 2013, 1:47pm
|
|
|
|
