|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
imin
Valinor
Feb 1 2013, 2:54pm
Views: 2116
Shortcut
|
But then the same could be said for Tolkien fandom in general, people have based their entire careers around it. For me the idea that the movie could only harm the greater good if it spread disease or warfare is nonsense. Many things cause harm but not disease. For myself i dont believe the film is harming the greater good though some people do. One of those is Christopher Tolkien, who stated as such when referring to the lord of the rings trilogy in Le Monde back in July. He felt the movie had created a world which was detrimental - harming Tolkien's work/ Middle-earth and was becoming the sole source or the primary source for the vision of middle-earth when he wanted it to be the books which he felt gave a person a better understanding of what the world was really about. It is about the collective populations image/understanding of the works. For me i dont think it will do much harm. It will mean more people end up buying the books than would have and some of those may then like it so much as to go on and read Tolkien's other works. One way i feel the films have harmed the Tolkien fandom is through the artwork. Prior to the films there was lots of artwork done by well known artists - which continues now. But also by amateurs and fans of the books. Due to it being a book, one could draw/paint etc ones own mental image - it seems now with the films there is an over dominance of film imagery in the art scene. This is to the detriment of the scene as it narrows its collective vision. Overall though i agree, the books will always be there and be able to be read by anyone who wishes to pick them up. Personally i think there will be more of a split between those who are fans of the movies and those who are fans of the books (irrespective of whether they watched the films or not). I am also kinda unsure why book fans feel threatened by the film (in the same way CT has) i mean their own personal vision of M-e will be the same and so why get bothered about it? All i can come up with is those peeps feel the book is better and want the film only fans to experience something better or so that the general publics perception of M-e is based on the books imagery not the films - which again leads to the question - but why is that important that the public think of the books when thinking of M-e? All far too serious for me, lol.
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
The Jackson Quibble: Is the new Hobbit flick harming the greater good?
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 12:59pm
|
Good and bad
|
stoutfiles
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:34pm
|
Anecdotal evidence
|
arithmancer
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:41pm
|
What do you think about the idea
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:48pm
|
Here's a link, Imin.
|
ShireHorse
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:46pm
|
Thanks
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:50pm
|
Speaking of Oxford....
|
ShireHorse
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:57pm
|
I saw that....
|
dormouse
|
Feb 1 2013, 1:59pm
|
Not gonna bother now
|
Elessar
|
Feb 1 2013, 2:06pm
|
Why would that be bizarre?
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 2:11pm
|
Bizarre?
|
dormouse
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:48pm
|
They are getting that money anyway
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:55pm
|
Fair enough
|
dormouse
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:56pm
|
wel said dormouse!
|
andwise
|
Feb 1 2013, 8:34pm
|
Agreed. Dissapointing how, to whom, and from what perspective? I
|
AinurOlorin
|
Feb 2 2013, 3:28am
|
I had the same reaction to that opening line ... "let's be honest ... " ...
|
Escapist
|
Feb 3 2013, 4:59pm
|
Aren't people taking these movies WAAAAY too seriously?
|
bborchar
|
Feb 1 2013, 2:14pm
|
It is too serious
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 2:54pm
|
As far as CT is concerned...
|
bborchar
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:19pm
|
It's called first world problems, lol
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:35pm
|
Exactly first world problems :)
|
bborchar
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:53pm
|
You know what i think that is kinda what it is for me
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:59pm
|
It does end eventually
|
Elessar
|
Feb 1 2013, 4:16pm
|
For me...
|
bborchar
|
Feb 1 2013, 4:40pm
|
I understand that
|
Elessar
|
Feb 1 2013, 5:04pm
|
Try the BBC
|
Lusitano
|
Feb 1 2013, 5:42pm
|
Imin... Unlikely
|
Bombadil
|
Feb 1 2013, 4:18pm
|
Cheers Bomby and Elessar :)
|
imin
|
Feb 1 2013, 4:44pm
|
Cheers
|
Elessar
|
Feb 1 2013, 5:11pm
|
You know. . . you'd be surprised.
|
AinurOlorin
|
Feb 2 2013, 3:57am
|
I have noticed the same.
|
Escapist
|
Feb 3 2013, 4:57pm
|
very well put..
|
andwise
|
Feb 1 2013, 8:47pm
|
We have our own Tolkien culture
|
Rostron2
|
Feb 1 2013, 3:46pm
|
I was quite puzzled
|
Kristin Thompson
|
Feb 1 2013, 4:28pm
|
Solution?
|
Bombadil
|
Feb 1 2013, 4:39pm
|
I agree -
|
geordie
|
Feb 2 2013, 10:41am
|
Manuscripts do not a museum make
|
Kristin Thompson
|
Feb 2 2013, 3:13pm
|
True
|
dormouse
|
Feb 2 2013, 3:55pm
|
True enough -
|
geordie
|
Feb 2 2013, 5:53pm
|
Harm? *snorts* No... not at all
|
Rostron2
|
Feb 1 2013, 6:52pm
|
This article lost all credibility
|
Lindele
|
Feb 1 2013, 7:05pm
|
To be frank
|
Radagast-Aiwendil
|
Feb 1 2013, 7:18pm
|
Adaption verses Re-imagining
|
Michelle Johnston
|
Feb 1 2013, 9:11pm
|
Should we listen to Critics
|
IdrilofGondolin
|
Feb 1 2013, 9:37pm
|
How is this any different from what happened in the 1960s?
|
Loresilme
|
Feb 1 2013, 9:53pm
|
Things change
|
hutch
|
Feb 2 2013, 2:45am
|
I'm just going to repeat what others have said...
|
Súlimë
|
Feb 2 2013, 4:44am
|
I bought a friend the Children of Hurin for their birthday because they liked AUJ.
|
Escapist
|
Feb 3 2013, 5:04pm
|
|
|
|