Our Sponsor Sideshow Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Hobbit:
lots of that is not related to the hobbit

imin
Valinor


Jan 10 2013, 2:17am


Views: 607
Shortcut
lots of that is not related to the hobbit [In reply to] Can't Post

a poster on here created a thread of all the things which were even remotely related to the hobbit from the appendices, it was very thorough and well done.

It doesnt come to 200 or 160 pages though, sorry. Many pages are on writing and family histories, kings of rohan etc. These dont have much to do with the hobbit other than this particular member of the took family was alive at the time of the hobbit.

It is nothing more than a bare framework on which one can get a sense of a larger history but that is things accounting for the first age and second age such as appendix A.

There is nothing in there that says things like the changes that were made in the film so dont pretend that there are. It is a framework for the time frame of the hobbit nothing more. Seriously it doesnt all involve the hobbit just because it is about ME, lol.

Unfinished tales would have been more useful for the film makers in my opinion.

So at the end of it, there is less than 160 pages, maybe more than 20 (i just thought u had perhaps mis typed the 200) but certainly less than 160, sorry, that was more just some PR by PJ et al.

My original point was if they had stuck to a two film format they wouldnt need the chase scenes and azog being annoyed on top of weathertop as they simply wouldnt have had time to do so.

This was the format they had been working on for a long time, when they changed it they realised they had shot lots of film and PJ felt they could make it work as three films - some scenes which would have ended up on the cutting room floor then made it in as the film couldnt just be the same length as the two film version would have been minus any parts of the movie after a certain point (carrock), people would have felt its a right rip off for doing that. So they had to expand the story from what they originally had intended, for me i take that to be padding it out - you can take it however you like, the fact is they had to add scenes to the movie to get it to length, otherwise as two films they would have been about 5 hours long each.

It comes down to you thinking Azog is a good character and is to the betterment of the story where as i think if they had just stuck to two films the series would have been better - though as i said in my original post now it is three films (obviously, lol) i do think they needed some created tension as they had to take longer to get places - something which in the hobbit doesnt happen - its from one place to the next.

Subject User Time
"All Good Stories Deserve A Little Embellishment" Black Breathalizer Send a private message to Black Breathalizer Jan 9 2013, 4:06am
    Brilliant post Ave Moria Send a private message to Ave Moria Jan 9 2013, 5:47am
        What about the trolls? Fredeghar Wayfarer Send a private message to Fredeghar Wayfarer Jan 9 2013, 8:33am
            That's a good point about the Trolls... Eleniel Send a private message to Eleniel Jan 9 2013, 10:41am
                Backstory in a film arithmancer Send a private message to arithmancer Jan 9 2013, 1:26pm
        What you say about Azog is a really good point BoromirOfWinterfell Send a private message to BoromirOfWinterfell Jan 9 2013, 10:43am
        This is my main problem with the film... jtarkey Send a private message to jtarkey Jan 9 2013, 11:22am
            Slow moving? pulpfiction16 Send a private message to pulpfiction16 Jan 9 2013, 12:58pm
            Which characters? arithmancer Send a private message to arithmancer Jan 9 2013, 1:31pm
        When we see the Ring fall Loresilme Send a private message to Loresilme Jan 9 2013, 3:57pm
        Also excellent points Rostron2 Send a private message to Rostron2 Jan 10 2013, 12:23am
            If they had kept it to two films imin Send a private message to imin Jan 10 2013, 12:56am
                Padding Ave Moria Send a private message to Ave Moria Jan 10 2013, 1:24am
                    200 pages? imin Send a private message to imin Jan 10 2013, 1:40am
                        I don't want to bicker Ave Moria Send a private message to Ave Moria Jan 10 2013, 2:03am
                            lots of that is not related to the hobbit imin Send a private message to imin Jan 10 2013, 2:17am
                Time to flesh out Tolkien's themes Black Breathalizer Send a private message to Black Breathalizer Jan 10 2013, 6:22pm
                    I think those scenes could have survived in a two film series imin Send a private message to imin Jan 10 2013, 10:25pm
    Neat thoughts! Roheryn Send a private message to Roheryn Jan 9 2013, 9:59am
    Are you the Tolkien Professor?? nobofthepony Send a private message to nobofthepony Jan 9 2013, 2:06pm
    The Arkenstone Black Breathalizer Send a private message to Black Breathalizer Jan 9 2013, 2:22pm
        All excellent observations Loresilme Send a private message to Loresilme Jan 9 2013, 4:02pm
    Book themes lost in the film adaptation burrahobbit Send a private message to burrahobbit Jan 9 2013, 3:16pm
        Enchantment Black Breathalizer Send a private message to Black Breathalizer Jan 9 2013, 6:36pm
    Agreed on all points Rostron2 Send a private message to Rostron2 Jan 9 2013, 4:57pm
    Great post. Thanks. // Compa_Mighty Jan 9 2013, 6:38pm
    Great points focusing on the positive percy Send a private message to percy Jan 10 2013, 12:12am
        This is Ave Moria Send a private message to Ave Moria Jan 10 2013, 1:31am
        Most EXCELLENT post!!!!!! // Tintallė Send a private message to Tintallė Jan 10 2013, 5:06am
    Gollum suggests riddles first in movie and book Nira Send a private message to Nira Jan 10 2013, 1:17am
    Good post imin Send a private message to imin Jan 10 2013, 1:55am
        Wouldn't Azog have been in it with two movies, anyway? Kimtc Send a private message to Kimtc Jan 10 2013, 3:31am
            Yeah he most likely would have been in it anyway imin Send a private message to imin Jan 10 2013, 3:34am
    A beautiful positioning Michelle Johnston Send a private message to Michelle Johnston Jan 11 2013, 2:37am
        Radagast represents Tolkien's conservation theme. Black Breathalizer Send a private message to Black Breathalizer Jan 11 2013, 3:48pm
    Wonderful post willowing Send a private message to willowing Jan 11 2013, 11:19pm
        And to Gandalf's "He's here." Yva Send a private message to Yva Jan 11 2013, 11:36pm
    Sound effects willowing Send a private message to willowing Jan 14 2013, 8:03am
    **I've Gathered Geeky List Info from this post :) THANKS ALL! // grammaboodawg Send a private message to grammaboodawg Jan 18 2013, 1:27pm

 
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.