|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe-Mathews
Rivendell
Dec 30 2012, 1:24am
Views: 885
Shortcut
|
Thumbs up, but can't give final grade.
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I saw it first in 24fps 3d, then in 48fps 3d, and again in 24fps 3d. I think 48fps (or something quicker than 24) is the way of the future. The video of the 48fps felt much smoother. But I would feel hard pressed to tell the difference if someone lied to me and showed me one but told me it was the other. I will have to give 48fps an incomplete grade though. In all of PJ's Tolkien films, he over-saturated and played with the color temperatures for emotional effect as well as to give it certain feel. While that's fine and worked well in LotR, occasionally he did over do it and it was distracting. The color saturation in AUJ in 48fps seems over-done. It reminded me of Beowulf and 300. It seemed fine to me both times in 24fps. The problem is that I don't know which look PJ intended, or even if he intended there to be a difference. However, my second viewing - the 48fps one - I enjoyed the most. Maybe a little over-stimulation has its benefits! I'll have to wait to see how other directors use 48fps. If every 48fps film looks over-saturated to me, then the 48fps is a problem.
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
Which format did you first see AUJ in and how do you feel about 48 FPS?
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 28 2012, 7:15pm
|
Will get back to you
|
Ardamírë
|
Dec 28 2012, 7:36pm
|
I have no feelings about the look of 48 FPS yet
|
Arwen's daughter
|
Dec 28 2012, 8:23pm
|
First saw in 2D
|
dubulous
|
Dec 28 2012, 9:02pm
|
Amazing.
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 28 2012, 9:41pm
|
Mixed feelings
|
Fredeghar Wayfarer
|
Dec 29 2012, 1:18am
|
Zero interest in 48 FPS or 3D.
|
Elizabeth
|
Dec 29 2012, 5:38am
|
I started off "hating" HFR
|
DanielLB
|
Dec 29 2012, 10:01am
|
A lot of people
|
Silverlode
|
Dec 29 2012, 10:12am
|
what she said
|
Magpie
|
Dec 29 2012, 4:42pm
|
I'm kind of the opposite these days...
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 31 2012, 12:20am
|
for what it's worth...
|
Magpie
|
Dec 31 2012, 3:31am
|
I wouldn't say I 'loved' HFR...
|
Magpie
|
Dec 29 2012, 4:47pm
|
I probably used the wrong terms in the poll...
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 29 2012, 7:02pm
|
I saw it in 24 first, went back & saw in 48
|
Annael
|
Dec 29 2012, 5:45pm
|
Interesting
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 29 2012, 7:08pm
|
my experience with Avatar was interesting
|
Magpie
|
Dec 29 2012, 8:33pm
|
James Horner
|
Ardamírë
|
Dec 29 2012, 8:38pm
|
I think Zimmer has the same problem
|
Magpie
|
Dec 29 2012, 9:53pm
|
Epic and bombastic
|
Ardamírë
|
Dec 29 2012, 10:12pm
|
they certainly are well used for a certain type of film. //
|
Magpie
|
Dec 29 2012, 10:59pm
|
oh, I agree!
|
Annael
|
Dec 30 2012, 5:15pm
|
again we agree
|
Annael
|
Dec 30 2012, 5:20pm
|
maybe the way PJ made it, viewing angle is more important than usual
|
awepittance
|
Dec 30 2012, 12:20pm
|
I was in the center for The Hobbit.
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 30 2012, 6:48pm
|
hmm
|
Annael
|
Dec 30 2012, 5:12pm
|
Entirely agree.
|
Silverlode
|
Dec 30 2012, 12:24am
|
Thumbs up, but can't give final grade.
|
Joe-Mathews
|
Dec 30 2012, 1:24am
|
Somewhat unique perspective
|
Eye's on Guard
|
Dec 30 2012, 12:19am
|
So is your viewing of The Hobbit
|
Starling
|
Dec 30 2012, 7:16am
|
That's correct
|
Eye's on Guard
|
Dec 31 2012, 3:03am
|
I tend to avoid 3D
|
Starling
|
Jan 2 2013, 12:29am
|
Based on results so far, my hypothesis is not supported.
|
Kassandros
|
Dec 31 2012, 12:22am
|
I'm struck by diametrically opposed opinions
|
Magpie
|
Dec 31 2012, 3:37am
|
Terrible
|
CathrineB
|
Jan 1 2013, 10:15pm
|
yes to 48bfps
|
Noria
|
Jan 2 2013, 1:39pm
|
I love 48 fps...
|
Hamfast
|
Jan 2 2013, 5:27pm
|
Nope.
|
Kassandros
|
Jan 7 2013, 10:23pm
|
3x 24fps, 1x 48fps
|
Rolfina
|
Jan 10 2013, 11:47am
|
Liked HFR
|
arithmancer
|
Jan 10 2013, 12:58pm
|
I've now seen all three formats...
|
HappyHobbitess
|
Jan 11 2013, 9:54pm
|
My opinion has changed.
|
Kassandros
|
Jan 14 2013, 7:19pm
|
HFR!
|
swordwhale
|
Jan 23 2013, 7:20am
|
I'm very excited about 48fps,
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Apr 2 2013, 12:37am
|
|
|
|