|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
huskyla27
Registered User
Dec 5 2012, 4:40pm
Views: 1518
Shortcut
|
|
The Hobbit 48 FPS, review/thoughts....
|
Can't Post
|
|
I was lucky enought to see a screening of the Hobbit on Warner Bros. lot Monday evening. I won't go into details about the story, but I wanted to comment on the 48 fps.
When the film first opens I was taken back by how different it did look. It was shocking to say the least. It is so crystal clear. You can see the details of the characters and surroundings down to a single blade of grass. I will agree with Peter Jackson that it took sometime for me to get comfortable with the change. I wasn't until at least an hour into the movie that I started to forget about the new frame rate and was able to be in awww by how beautiful the film looked. I also think that with F/X heavy CGI films the 48 fps really made everything look real. It was much harder to notice a distiction between what was real and what was CGI, it all looked real, even the CG characters. As for people that say they are getting motion sickness, I call BS on that one. The actions scenes don't have the jerkiness or roughness that they have with 24 fps. Everything is very smooth and when the action gets quick there is no blurring or "what was that", you are able to see everything in very high clarity.
This process also helped the 3D as it didn't give that darkness that 24 fps 3D movies have. Everything was bright and looked amazing.
Overall, I like the new frame rate. I didn't notice any issues with it and as many have said it's like when you went from a standard TV to HDTV. The technology will grow and can only get better. I can't wait to see the film again in 48 fps.
I wanted to know if there are others who might have had a chance to see it thought about the 48 fps. Let me know what you think..
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
The Hobbit 48 FPS, review/thoughts....
|
huskyla27
|
Dec 5 2012, 4:40pm
|
Thank you but..
|
nobofthepony
|
Dec 5 2012, 4:49pm
|
|
another thought
|
huskyla27
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:03pm
|
|
Thank you!
|
nobofthepony
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:15pm
|
|
This man gives a very insightfull review on 48 fps
|
Lusitano
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:07pm
|
|
Glasses
|
huskyla27
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:18pm
|
|
Thank you
|
Lusitano
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:47pm
|
|
twitchfilm.com
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:23pm
|
|
Its a great article
|
Lusitano
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:49pm
|
|
Encouraging
|
Lindele
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:15pm
|
|
Agreed
|
huskyla27
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:29pm
|
|
Regarding:
|
Tampa Phil
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:22pm
|
|
That may be true
|
Lindele
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:26pm
|
|
Actually,
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Dec 5 2012, 5:32pm
|
|
I want to see it the old way the first time, because
|
Aunt Dora Baggins
|
Dec 5 2012, 6:21pm
|
|
Thank you so much for sharing!
|
hamlet
|
Dec 5 2012, 7:49pm
|
|
to clarify --
|
hamlet
|
Dec 5 2012, 7:56pm
|
|
ditto to Huskyla
|
Defiant
|
Dec 5 2012, 8:34pm
|
|
the media like to blow things up
|
Balrogslunch
|
Dec 5 2012, 8:56pm
|
|
I have never seen 48fps
|
sphdle1
|
Dec 5 2012, 11:33pm
|
|
|
|
