|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sauget.diblosio
Tol Eressea
Dec 4 2012, 5:23pm
Views: 237
Shortcut
|
I've read about 15 reviews now, and overall they seem to skew positive. There's been a couple negative ones, but there's been a few glowingly positive ones as well. And most of the out-and-out negativity seems aimed towards HFR, which is understandable (and why press screenings should have stuck with the traditional 24 fps!). A lot of complaints about the slow first act and bad cgi. Everything else is coming off pretty well, especially Bilbo, Gandalf, Thorin, Gollum, Howard Shore and NZ/Middle-Earth itself.
Me, i'm fine if AUJ is the worst of the 6 films-- as long as it's fun and has plenty of Tolkien mythology. The things that concern me-- bad, overdone comedy (Radagast-- not a McCoy fan), too much cgi (goblins that don't seem "real" or "there"), characters not inhabiting a realistic physical world/cartoon physics-- definitely seem to be a problem, but aren't deal breakers if the overall film is still good. It may not be LOTR, but it will be a hit, and we have 2 more coming no matter what.
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
How is The Hobbit possible with '' too much'' CGI ?
|
Gusev8
|
Dec 4 2012, 9:57am
|
The only review
|
Gusev8
|
Dec 4 2012, 10:09am
|
|
to everyone hyperventilating over reviews...Relax...
|
nobofthepony
|
Dec 4 2012, 10:56am
|
|
agree with all you are saying
|
Balrogslunch
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:12am
|
|
I'm kind of surprised
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:32am
|
|
completely agree...
|
nobofthepony
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:36am
|
|
I hope DOS
|
Wordofmask
|
Dec 4 2012, 1:46pm
|
|
It's the way forward
|
DanielLB
|
Dec 4 2012, 1:59pm
|
|
a point to remember.....
|
Balrogslunch
|
Dec 4 2012, 11:40am
|
|
Thank you
|
Lindele
|
Dec 4 2012, 4:34pm
|
|
Reviews seemed balanced
|
sauget.diblosio
|
Dec 4 2012, 5:23pm
|
|
Yeah, its' about 75% on the tomatometer
|
totoro
|
Dec 5 2012, 4:41am
|
|
|
|
