|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweezers of Thu
Rivendell
Nov 11 2012, 8:29pm
Views: 1576
Shortcut
|
But I must confess that I find the lack of participation in the Reading Room perplexing. I've mostly been a reader here so I'm the last person who should comment on the posting habits of others. I'm just wondering if there's something we need to talk about, to clear the air perhaps, in order for the Reading Room to get back to a place of robust discussions.
Likewise, I'm right there among the last who has any right to comment on the posting rate in the Reading Room (RR), given that I am more often inclined to quietly read the discussions rather than participate. But I'll offer my personal take on this.
Frequently, when a poster new to the RR poses a question, a veteran Reading Roomer provides a link to the effect of "We have discussed this before." Such links can be enlightening and quite interesting to peruse, but sometimes this type of response can be chilling. That is, the original poster may have the impression of "Well, we've discussed already, so let's not reiterate the subject." That, I am certain, is not the intention of providing said links, but some folks (particularly new blood in the RR), may perceive it this way.
As pointed out, analyses of the text are often quite thorough here. Presumably, some participants may know Tolkien minutiae so well that they needn't flip through pages and pages of text and have the gift of being able to quote or paraphrase accurately right off the top of their head. Others, like myself, may have a number of volumes at their disposal, so when they have that glimmering of "Hmmm, I think I recall this tidbit, but I had better verify it before I open my yap," they scour the texts. The latter approach is time-consuming, and thus, a fully engaged discussion with proper references can wind up becoming a significant time sink. At least in my case (please to note that I signed on in May 2008 and have a whopping 214 posts), that gives me pause and makes me more inclined to lazily read than actively participate.
Also, there's the aspect of the subjective versus the objective. Literary analyses strike me as being considerably more subjective than the objective analyses that make up my day-to-day way of thinking. Such subjectivity is fine, even freeing, but it does mean that each and every one of us reads Tolkien through the lenses of our experience, just as we perceive any form of art. Not that there's anything wrong with disagreements over interpretation, but occasionally (occasionally, mind you), I can't help but think "This ain't rocket science, folks!" By that I mean our interpretations of art are not easily quantifiable, so one probably shouldn't be too dogmatic when it comes to interpretation of Tolkien's legendarium, and sometimes, I do get a whiff of dogmatism in the RR.
Speaking for myself, although I love Tolkien's legendarium, I do not lionize the author. I wonder if that is a minority viewpoint here. Also, I have a tendency toward irreverence and might be more inclined to engage when, for example, Morthoron holds forth.
So, it's with massive self-consciousness from all the caveats above that I'll say a discussion of Unfinished Tales is an excellent suggestion, even if I just read such a discussion like the nasty parasitic lurker that I am.
A lake is the landscape's most beautiful and expressive feature. It is Earth's eye; looking into which the beholder measures the depth of his own nature. ~~ Henry David Thoreau
(This post was edited by Tweezers of Thu on Nov 11 2012, 8:32pm)
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
What's next for the Reading Room?
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 10 2012, 7:09am
|
Arda Reconstructed!
|
Voronwë_the_Faithful
|
Nov 10 2012, 5:49pm
|
|
I'd love to...
|
mandel
|
Nov 10 2012, 8:55pm
|
|
It would be a good excuse to read it finally
|
SirDennisC
|
Nov 11 2012, 2:49am
|
|
I wonder
|
titanium_hobbit
|
Nov 11 2012, 5:59am
|
|
Participation in the Reading Room...
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 11 2012, 7:25am
|
|
I'm in the same boat as SirDennisC
|
DanielLB
|
Nov 11 2012, 10:17am
|
|
A suggestion to get general chit chat in the RR
|
DanielLB
|
Nov 11 2012, 1:17pm
|
|
Some chapter discussions work that way.
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 12 2012, 7:21am
|
|
Would it be more effective if it wasn't so structured?
|
DanielLB
|
Nov 12 2012, 8:54am
|
|
I think this is the way to go
|
imin
|
Nov 17 2012, 9:41am
|
|
suggestion...
|
Demosthenes
|
Nov 11 2012, 11:02am
|
|
An honest appraisal
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Nov 11 2012, 8:29pm
|
|
10 Ways To Get More Posters into the Reading Room...
|
Morthoron
|
Nov 12 2012, 3:13am
|
|
Heh, not sure Orlando is the carrot he once was
|
SirDennisC
|
Nov 12 2012, 4:34am
|
|
This is exactly the problem for me--not Orlando! But this:
|
Ethel Duath
|
Nov 13 2012, 5:04am
|
|
Some great ideas, some not so much.
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 12 2012, 7:16am
|
|
[Captain Picard] Engage! [/Captain Picard]
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Nov 12 2012, 12:22pm
|
|
As a serial offender, I feel called to respond!
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 12 2012, 7:40am
|
|
Shadows of the past
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Nov 12 2012, 12:48pm
|
|
Old posts and new
|
CuriousG
|
Nov 14 2012, 8:15pm
|
|
Very true...
|
Morthoron
|
Nov 15 2012, 2:19am
|
|
A technical issue that might be relevant as well
|
Rolfina
|
Nov 15 2012, 9:19am
|
|
The best place to discuss this issue is the Feedback Forum.
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 15 2012, 7:37pm
|
|
Well...
|
Malveth
|
Nov 11 2012, 2:03pm
|
|
Personally, I love the idea of doing "The Fall of Arthur"
|
Voronwë_the_Faithful
|
Nov 11 2012, 2:14pm
|
|
What's kept me out...
|
Malveth
|
Nov 11 2012, 2:27pm
|
|
That's is a good thing to keep in mine for next spring!
|
Elizabeth
|
Nov 12 2012, 7:53am
|
|
I like this idea too
|
DanielLB
|
Nov 11 2012, 2:56pm
|
|
Why not Character profiles/ discussion?
|
malickfan
|
Nov 13 2012, 12:36pm
|
|
Excellent Discussion
|
Finwe
|
Nov 17 2012, 4:52am
|
|
thoughts here -->
|
batik
|
Nov 23 2012, 7:49pm
|
|
Unfinished Tales
|
elostirion74
|
Nov 26 2012, 5:55pm
|
|
|
|
