|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aruman
Rivendell
Oct 14 2012, 5:19pm
Views: 1012
Shortcut
|
I guess the big question all this is making me ask myself is, "When reading the book, who is the 'Supreme Deity' here, the author or the reader?" Does it really matter if the author goofed if the reader believes that an "inconsistency" makes sense on some level? I think the only person who could answer the question of whether he goofed or not would be the Professor. I believe this is why we are debating this. To borrow a concept from Sir Ian, who said that this story never really happened, "...except somewhere in our hearts," it seems like in the story that occured in some of our hearts there was a goof up, either on the part of Aragorn or Tolkien, whereas, in the story that happened in other hearts, Aragorn was speaking in a general sense and there was no mistake.
In the movies Elrond, Denethor, Haldir, Galadriel, and Celeborn stink.
(This post was edited by aruman on Oct 14 2012, 5:27pm)
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
A so called "inconsistency"
|
aruman
|
Oct 11 2012, 12:54pm
|
Your conclusion is what I've always thought myself.
|
CuriousG
|
Oct 11 2012, 4:28pm
|
Thanks...
|
aruman
|
Oct 11 2012, 6:04pm
|
Inconsistency is as inconsistency does
|
squire
|
Oct 11 2012, 6:41pm
|
Inconsistency vs. complexity
|
CuriousG
|
Oct 11 2012, 8:13pm
|
Exactly
|
aruman
|
Oct 12 2012, 1:34am
|
That's not what I would call complexity.
|
sador
|
Oct 12 2012, 12:41pm
|
"No doubt?" Really?
|
aruman
|
Oct 12 2012, 3:33pm
|
Plenty of doubt, when you think about it
|
CuriousG
|
Oct 12 2012, 7:10pm
|
technically, runes versus letters...
|
Elthir
|
Oct 13 2012, 10:24pm
|
Thank you!
|
aruman
|
Oct 14 2012, 4:51pm
|
What reason would Sauron have at that point...
|
mandel
|
Oct 11 2012, 11:56pm
|
Maybe
|
aruman
|
Oct 12 2012, 1:30am
|
From Parma Eldalamberon 17, Saura (Quenya) = foul, vile...
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Oct 12 2012, 12:49pm
|
So, it's not his real name.
|
Elizabeth
|
Oct 12 2012, 8:47pm
|
By Jove, er, Jupiter, I mean...Zeus!
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Oct 12 2012, 10:08pm
|
My take...
|
Morthoron
|
Oct 13 2012, 1:45am
|
This...
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Oct 13 2012, 3:57pm
|
A Dark Lord by any other name...
|
Elthir
|
Oct 13 2012, 10:48pm
|
You might be right, i.e., . . .
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Oct 15 2012, 1:25pm
|
My take on it as well and what is Aragorn's "real" name anyway?
|
telain
|
Oct 19 2012, 1:19pm
|
S is for Sauron
|
Elthir
|
Oct 19 2012, 6:09pm
|
true, true!
|
telain
|
Oct 20 2012, 11:25am
|
The meaning 'disgusting, foul, vile'...
|
Elthir
|
Oct 13 2012, 10:30pm
|
Thanks for the correction!
|
Tweezers of Thu
|
Oct 13 2012, 10:46pm
|
Another distinction
|
Phibbus
|
Oct 18 2012, 3:47am
|
Why do you assume the MoS was permitted to use the name?
|
Noel Q. von Schneiffel
|
Oct 20 2012, 12:49pm
|
Perhaps there is consistency
|
Plurmo
|
Oct 12 2012, 4:27am
|
I think you've hit the nail on the head.
|
FarFromHome
|
Oct 12 2012, 10:35am
|
It could have been
|
ElendilTheShort
|
Oct 13 2012, 8:36am
|
That would be me...
|
FarFromHome
|
Oct 14 2012, 11:58am
|
Can one be "willing" or "unwilling" when one no longer has a will?
|
squire
|
Oct 14 2012, 1:35pm
|
Good point
|
FarFromHome
|
Oct 14 2012, 8:21pm
|
I'm of the opinion loyalty must be a willing choice
|
ElendilTheShort
|
Oct 15 2012, 6:52am
|
A couple great points here
|
aruman
|
Oct 14 2012, 5:10pm
|
Question
|
aruman
|
Oct 14 2012, 5:19pm
|
Excellent question
|
CuriousG
|
Oct 18 2012, 8:13pm
|
The Difficulty of having a Lord one can't name...
|
Morthoron
|
Oct 19 2012, 3:49am
|
Very nice!
|
sador
|
Oct 21 2012, 8:25am
|
|
|
|