|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dijomaja
Lorien
Oct 11 2012, 11:02am
Views: 1332
Shortcut
|
Tolkien referred to his writing as "sub-creation", implying a recognition of a higher level of creation to which he deferred. A "rationalization"? Not to me. I suppose it boils down to how comfortable we are not "knowing" everything. I always liked the idea that even Tolkien wasn't sure who (or even what) Bombadil was.
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
Gollum's ultimate "fate"?
|
CyberGhostface
|
Oct 5 2012, 11:11pm
|
Yes.
|
Elizabeth
|
Oct 6 2012, 3:59am
|
great question
|
dijomaja
|
Oct 6 2012, 11:14am
|
True, however
|
elevorn
|
Oct 8 2012, 1:52pm
|
well, first let me say...
|
weaver
|
Oct 9 2012, 2:39am
|
Literary Cowardice II
|
JWPlatt
|
Oct 9 2012, 3:24am
|
Well if you have an artisticall inspiration...
|
Mr. Arkenstone (isaac)
|
Oct 9 2012, 2:55pm
|
Fictional characters often wander off to unspecified fates.
|
Elizabeth
|
Oct 9 2012, 10:18pm
|
Rationalizations
|
JWPlatt
|
Oct 9 2012, 10:51pm
|
Maybe you're misinterpreting
|
FarFromHome
|
Oct 10 2012, 8:49am
|
don't forget...
|
dijomaja
|
Oct 11 2012, 11:02am
|
|
|
|