|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silverlode
Forum Admin
/ Moderator
Apr 26 2012, 3:15am
Views: 57240
Shortcut
|
So maybe you can answer a question I have....
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
The scenes we saw in the trailer were shot at the same speed and resolution as all the rest of the footage but shown/streamed in 2D and at 24fps. I realize that the downgrade to 24fps means we can't see the effect of the higher framerate in the trailer, but would it also have removed all of the extra clarity of the high resolution? Or would it be reasonable to assume that the shots in the trailer had had more post work done on them than the 10 mins at CinemaCon and therefore be a better example of what the finished product would look like? I wonder if they should have just shown the trailer at 48fps in 3D if the work on those shots is further along? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
Silverlode "Of all faces those of our familiares are the ones both most difficult to play fantastic tricks with, and most difficult really to see with fresh attention. They have become like the things which once attracted us by their glitter, or their colour, or their shape, and we laid hands on them, and then locked them in our hoard, acquired them, and acquiring ceased to look at them. Creative fantasy, because it is mainly trying to do something else [make something new], may open your hoard and let all the locked things fly away like cage-birds. The gems all turn into flowers or flames, and you will be warned that all you had (or knew) was dangerous and potent, not really effectively chained, free and wild; no more yours than they were you." -On Fairy Stories
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
4K Resolution
|
Shelob'sAppetite
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:27am
|
My thoughts
|
duats
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:32am
|
Makes sense
|
Shelob'sAppetite
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:35am
|
Great questions!
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:54am
|
So maybe you can answer a question I have....
|
Silverlode
|
Apr 26 2012, 3:15am
|
More great questions.
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 3:29am
|
I saw the 3D trailer before Tintin also.
|
Silverlode
|
Apr 26 2012, 3:39am
|
A very significant difference.
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 3:43am
|
Owain
|
Buchanicus
|
Apr 26 2012, 4:04am
|
Hey thanks Buchanicus...
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 4:27am
|
Just seconding everyone's thoughts. Your posts are more insightful...
|
Compa_Mighty
|
Apr 26 2012, 6:06am
|
This brighter business
|
Shelob'sAppetite
|
Apr 26 2012, 4:42am
|
Oversampling is the key
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 4:58am
|
The beauty of the REDCODE RAW...
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 5:02am
|
RED
|
Night Wolf
|
Apr 26 2012, 6:19am
|
In an ideal world...
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 4:26am
|
RED Compensation
|
JWPlatt
|
Apr 26 2012, 3:24am
|
It's not really a limitation of the camera... it's more about workflow.
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 3:34am
|
Specific Look
|
JWPlatt
|
Apr 26 2012, 9:06pm
|
It's just like with any other raw image
|
Finrod
|
Apr 26 2012, 9:18pm
|
Pop
|
JWPlatt
|
Apr 26 2012, 9:32pm
|
flat does not mean without color
|
Chopsta123
|
Apr 26 2012, 10:24pm
|
sorry
|
Chopsta123
|
Apr 27 2012, 7:02am
|
Agreed.
|
Owain
|
Apr 27 2012, 1:59pm
|
:)
|
Chopsta123
|
Apr 27 2012, 5:24pm
|
Qwain
|
Steven Van der Berg
|
Apr 26 2012, 11:33am
|
Here is a link from Douglas Trumbull... a legend in the industry...
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:44pm
|
Yes...
|
Owain
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:45pm
|
Very interesting and informative, for someone who "knows nothing"...
|
jschomburg
|
Apr 26 2012, 1:06pm
|
THIS is marvelous!
|
DarkJackal
|
Apr 26 2012, 2:21pm
|
color correction is everything these days
|
There&ThereAgain
|
Apr 27 2012, 1:32am
|
|
|
|