Our Sponsor Sideshow Collectibles Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien
Do you enjoy the 100% volunteer, not for profit services of TheOneRing.net?
Consider a donation!

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Movie Discussion: The Lord of the Rings:
Consider the changes as being about Aragorn

Harold.of.Whoa
Bree


Apr 4 2012, 6:01pm


Views: 378
Shortcut
Consider the changes as being about Aragorn [In reply to] Can't Post

Aruman,

I think some of the complaints about Movie Elrond are valid, and you lay them out well.

I can't make you feel any better about the diminishment of a character you love, but I might suggest a couple of thoughts about why it might have been done.

The entire "Men are weak" story emphasis is, I believe, in place because of a decision to enlarge the importance of Aragorn's character, making him more of a co-equal figure with Frodo. Doing so required Aragorn's character to have more of a developmental arc than in the book, and also made it desirable to revise Aragorn's motivations to something easier for a broad audience to understand, accept, and invest in.

Elrond's display of personal dismay at Isildur's failings, his reproachful attitude toward Aragorn's life choices, and his extrapolated prejudice towards the potential for good in Men are all written in to lay the groundwork for Aragorn's 'journey.' Movie Aragorn shares this doubt about his own people and himself, and that provides a starting point for his transformation, his reason for staying in exile, the timing of his emergence, the reason he ultimately seeks the throne, and his evolving relationship with Arwen (even though they are separated for almost the entire trilogy.)

The emotional punch to the end of FotR stems directly from this storyline.

A side benefit (if you want to look at it that way) of the Elrond re-imagining is that it gives Elrond's character an arc as well, and it allows him to be in the story much more than in the book. It also enfolds him into a central theme that is woven throughout the trilogy having to do with Engagement vs. Withdrawal. Something similar is true for Arwen, to an even greater extent.

I have been thinking about this issue a lot recently in connection with another discussion in another forum, at least insofar as it pertains to Movie Aragorn's character and his core motivations. That's why I wanted to respond to your post. I know that none of this really defends the changes to Elrond, per se, but it might be something to ponder.

Subject User Time
Elrond in the movies aruman Send a private message to aruman Apr 4 2012, 5:12pm
    Consider the changes as being about Aragorn Harold.of.Whoa Send a private message to Harold.of.Whoa Apr 4 2012, 6:01pm
        Good points aruman Send a private message to aruman Apr 5 2012, 2:38am
    Elrond Fertlthewhite Send a private message to Fertlthewhite Apr 5 2012, 7:36am
        This raises a couple of issues DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 5 2012, 7:44am
            too kindly to end all evil once and for all? Fertlthewhite Send a private message to Fertlthewhite Apr 5 2012, 7:51am
                Elrond would have commited murder DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 5 2012, 8:08am
                    martyr for the good Fertlthewhite Send a private message to Fertlthewhite Apr 5 2012, 8:16am
                Destroying the Ring Shelob'sAppetite Send a private message to Shelob'sAppetite Apr 6 2012, 2:37pm
            Thoughts aruman Send a private message to aruman Apr 6 2012, 4:12am
                Agree with your points DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 8:33am
                    The ring was weregild imin Send a private message to imin Apr 6 2012, 9:00am
                        They were never ElendilTheShort Send a private message to ElendilTheShort Apr 6 2012, 9:55am
                            yeah exactly imin Send a private message to imin Apr 6 2012, 10:01am
                                Weregild DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 10:07am
                                    It is written here imin Send a private message to imin Apr 6 2012, 10:12am
                                        Well I must of read it before then DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 10:18am
                                        Isildur ElendilTheShort Send a private message to ElendilTheShort Apr 6 2012, 10:19am
                                            I have always thought imin Send a private message to imin Apr 6 2012, 9:54pm
                                                Letter 131 DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 9:59pm
                                                    yeah exactly imin Send a private message to imin Apr 6 2012, 10:30pm
                                                        Yeah, its a tricky one DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 10:33pm
                                                            There was a similar discussion on imdb recently Magpie Send a private message to Magpie Apr 6 2012, 10:43pm
                                I correct ElendilTheShort Send a private message to ElendilTheShort Apr 6 2012, 10:13am
    Movie Elrond ElendilTheShort Send a private message to ElendilTheShort Apr 5 2012, 8:31am
        Agreed aruman Send a private message to aruman Apr 6 2012, 3:56am
            We know that DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 8:29am
                Yes, Bombadil could have cast the Ring into the fire... Otaku-sempai Send a private message to Otaku-sempai Apr 6 2012, 8:41pm
                    Mis-understood my post DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 8:46pm
                        "I do not think that word means what you think it means." Otaku-sempai Send a private message to Otaku-sempai Apr 6 2012, 8:52pm
                            Eh? / DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 8:55pm
                                You understand perfectly well what I wrote. Otaku-sempai Send a private message to Otaku-sempai Apr 6 2012, 9:03pm
                                    But I'm not arguing and DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 9:05pm
                                        It's a matter of semantics... Otaku-sempai Send a private message to Otaku-sempai Apr 6 2012, 9:08pm
                                            Ok Otaku-sempai DanielLB Send a private message to DanielLB Apr 6 2012, 9:13pm
    UM Aren't Elves Weaker Then Men TheGoblinKing Send a private message to TheGoblinKing Apr 10 2012, 9:46pm
        TheGoblinKing ElendilTheShort Send a private message to ElendilTheShort Apr 10 2012, 10:14pm
            Still Yet TheGoblinKing Send a private message to TheGoblinKing Apr 11 2012, 12:43am
                Bilbo could use ElendilTheShort Send a private message to ElendilTheShort Apr 11 2012, 1:18am
                    AND... aruman Send a private message to aruman Apr 11 2012, 2:48am

 
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.