|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gildor
Rivendell
Oct 29 2010, 4:49am
Views: 6569
Shortcut
|
your last paragraph. That is really close to my own thoughts, and I'm willing to bet, closer to truth than what most have said. The following is pure speculation on my part, but I've begun to wonder if the reason NZ Equity went after the Hobbit in the first place was precisely because they thought it was unassailable and untouchable and therefore a safe bet to attack and get publicity out of in their attempt to address problems with the industry as a whole. PJ is such a giant in NZ, I think it never occurred to them that they could actually bring down the production, hence their baffled protests of innocent and relatively minor intentions during the last month. Along comes the head of the Australian union, calling a boycott they apparently never actually asked for(!), for reasons best known to himself, and drops a tanker's worth of gasoline on their little protest flame. Turns out the giant has a weakness after all, which is the need to keep the trust of the studio, the even bigger giant in the cave across the ocean. Before NZ Equity knew it, all attention was focused on the wounded giant, the really huge giant had arrived on the scene waving a big club and demanding apologies and restitution all 'round or else, and any chance of their being heard in the commotion was utterly gone. The urgency derives from the spectacle of a very large giant with a very large club and the mob of public opinion fueled by media attention waving torches and pitchforks. I'm sure it seems rather urgent to make it all go away as quickly as possible. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how we found ourselves where we are today.
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
Parliament Passes Hobbit Bill
|
Elentari03
|
Oct 29 2010, 12:43am
|
I still don't understand
|
duats
|
Oct 29 2010, 12:45am
|
I don't either
|
Tim
|
Oct 29 2010, 12:50am
|
never ending headache?
|
Melkors_Wrath
|
Oct 29 2010, 12:59am
|
So the unions push for changes and end up worse in the sense
|
Eruonen
|
Oct 29 2010, 1:43am
|
Not sure if this explains it any better, but....
|
Iolite
|
Oct 29 2010, 3:26am
|
They lose recourse
|
Gildor
|
Oct 29 2010, 2:03am
|
I'm still puzzled
|
Moahunter
|
Oct 29 2010, 2:44am
|
I don't think this was about industrial action.
|
Silverlode
|
Oct 29 2010, 4:38am
|
I love...
|
Gildor
|
Oct 29 2010, 4:49am
|
Completely agree
|
entmaiden
|
Oct 29 2010, 4:50am
|
You do paint a vivid picture...
|
Earl
|
Oct 29 2010, 6:09am
|
Your speculation sounds pretty solid to me
|
Peredhil lover
|
Oct 29 2010, 7:22am
|
I agree with this point
|
Tim
|
Oct 29 2010, 3:23pm
|
In reply to Moahunter
|
SirDennisC
|
Oct 29 2010, 7:24am
|
Employee or contractor.
|
Moahunter
|
Oct 29 2010, 7:35am
|
Nobody tells me where I can't or can't work. //
|
SirDennisC
|
Oct 29 2010, 7:37am
|
Let me clarify my position
|
Tim
|
Oct 29 2010, 4:26pm
|
Well reasoned. //
|
SirDennisC
|
Oct 29 2010, 5:04pm
|
other things to consider
|
Jettorex
|
Oct 29 2010, 5:33pm
|
Just to get things straight...
|
Huan71
|
Oct 29 2010, 8:44pm
|
Are contractors more protected than employees, in some ways
|
squire
|
Oct 29 2010, 10:27pm
|
My thoughts
|
Peredhil lover
|
Oct 30 2010, 1:39pm
|
Thanks, Gildor
|
Altaira
|
Oct 29 2010, 4:40am
|
Right...
|
Gandalf'sMother
|
Oct 29 2010, 5:41am
|
I agree
|
Voronwë_the_Faithful
|
Oct 29 2010, 6:40am
|
maybe not to the "industry" ...
|
AngryDwarf
|
Oct 29 2010, 7:45am
|
Any faith...?
|
Huan71
|
Oct 29 2010, 10:57am
|
Actually
|
Gandalf'sMother
|
Oct 29 2010, 3:56pm
|
Huzzaaaaah!//
|
Owain
|
Oct 29 2010, 12:45am
|
Thats what I call backfiring ....
|
AngryDwarf
|
Oct 29 2010, 7:31am
|
This bill is about stability
|
sphdle1
|
Oct 29 2010, 11:55am
|
Rather Uncomfortable
|
Lord Maegmoth
|
Oct 29 2010, 3:10pm
|
|
|
|