|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curious
Half-elven
Jul 12 2010, 9:04pm
Views: 1182
Shortcut
|
Consider Saruman, indeed. He never came into contact with the Ring, and yet was tempted by it. Don't you think he would have been equally tempted by a non-magical means to power? It was power, or the means to power, that tempted him. It was not the Ring that corrupted Saruman's heart, but the desire for the Ring. This reminds me of the Bible quote that the "love of money is the root of all kinds of evil." 1 Timothy 6:10. Not money, as often misquoted, but the love of money, which is internal and present when money is not. Tolkien makes it clear from beginning to end that good will or good intent, whether of bearer or beholder, only delays or disguises the Ring's imperative towards evil. I don't see this for people who don't actually bear or behold the Ring, such as Saruman. It was not the Ring's imperative towards evil that corrupted him, but the desire in his heart. Similarly, many who behold or touch the Ring briefly show no ill effects, and even those who bear the Ring -- Bilbo, Frodo, and Sam -- are very slow to show ill effects, in sharp contrast to Gollum, who was already corrupt. Contrast this with the Sauron-tainted palantir, which quickly and severely affects all who look into it even briefly, and is only safe in Aragorn's hands because he has the right to use it and the ability to defeat Sauron in a contest of wills. The implication is that if Aragorn had not defeated Sauron, he would have become at least as mad as Denethor, if not as corrupt as Saruman. It is simply not safe to look into the palantir, just as it is not safe to bear the Ring. But beholding the Ring or even touching it briefly seems perfectly safe, except for those who are already tempted by the very thought of the Ring.
(This post was edited by Curious on Jul 12 2010, 9:06pm)
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
why was Faramir not tempted by the Ring?
|
TheNazgul
|
Jul 12 2010, 5:11am
|
Faramir was more aware of the dangers of absolute power
|
elostirion74
|
Jul 12 2010, 6:52am
|
What makes you so sure
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 12 2010, 9:07am
|
I disagree.
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 12:14pm
|
Disagreeing with disagreement :)
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 12 2010, 12:37pm
|
I would say
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 3:28pm
|
The Nine Kings were not necessarily "corrupt" in the beginning
|
squire
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:56pm
|
As ringbearers,
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 5:11pm
|
Elrond's weakness is revealed
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 20 2010, 1:03pm
|
Excellent point
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 20 2010, 1:23pm
|
Completing the set
|
squire
|
Jul 20 2010, 4:19pm
|
The Ring starts with the good natures, then leads to evil
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 13 2010, 1:44pm
|
Sam was wearing the Ring
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 3:10pm
|
"So no, the Ring didn't corrupt Boromir."
|
squire
|
Jul 13 2010, 3:24pm
|
I was simply repeating
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 3:32pm
|
I do agree with this distinction
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 13 2010, 3:55pm
|
It's possible
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 4:16pm
|
Saruman and Denethor were never close to the Ring
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 13 2010, 5:52pm
|
That's a good point.
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 7:16pm
|
background
|
Arwen Skywalker
|
Jul 13 2010, 8:00pm
|
It is precisely because
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 8:15pm
|
So simple
|
squire
|
Jul 13 2010, 6:38pm
|
I'm dubious too!
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 7:31pm
|
Yes, desire for the Ring
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 11:21am
|
Sam was not wearing the Ring
|
dernwyn
|
Jul 15 2010, 2:30am
|
Okay, but Sam was
|
Curious
|
Jul 15 2010, 3:25am
|
Bearing vs. wearing
|
dernwyn
|
Jul 15 2010, 11:34am
|
Wearing is different anyway
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 15 2010, 12:33pm
|
Do you mean,
|
dernwyn
|
Jul 15 2010, 4:13pm
|
mmmmm
|
Curious
|
Jul 15 2010, 5:56pm
|
Good point.//
|
Curious
|
Jul 15 2010, 1:50pm
|
Clear as...
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 15 2010, 9:23am
|
I love your Ring/donut comparison!
|
dernwyn
|
Jul 15 2010, 10:36am
|
Faramir's reaction
|
elostirion74
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:40pm
|
Why wasn't anyone other than Boromir and Gollum tempted by the Ring?
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 12:30pm
|
Aragorn, Faramir, Gandalf, Galadriel and Sam are all tempted by the Ring
|
Voronwë_the_Faithful
|
Jul 12 2010, 1:30pm
|
One's reaction to the Temptation of the Ring
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 1:49pm
|
To take that analogy further,
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 8:09pm
|
So much better
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 3:13pm
|
What is temptation?
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:06pm
|
What is magical temptation?
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:33pm
|
magical temptation
|
elostirion74
|
Jul 12 2010, 5:04pm
|
Hmm.
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 6:21pm
|
The function of the Palantirs
|
elostirion74
|
Jul 13 2010, 6:48am
|
It's possible
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 11:45am
|
The One Ring's functions are more complex.
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 5:07pm
|
So you agree that Faramir was not tempted?
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 6:24pm
|
I would say that he had the resolve to resist whatever the temptation was.
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 7:20pm
|
What you describe
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 8:04pm
|
Elrond says otherwise
|
squire
|
Jul 12 2010, 8:32pm
|
I see no contradiction.
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 9:04pm
|
No point in tempting other hobbits
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 13 2010, 1:26pm
|
I guess you mean
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 12 2010, 2:02pm
|
I don't understand why you think that Aragorn was not tempted by the Ring
|
Voronwë_the_Faithful
|
Jul 12 2010, 2:09pm
|
You mean at the Prancing Pony?
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 12 2010, 3:36pm
|
I don't see a basis
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 8:13pm
|
Well, I do see a basis
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 12 2010, 9:40pm
|
I didn't say
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 10:32pm
|
I agree with
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 13 2010, 8:35am
|
"I agree, but ..."
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 11:57am
|
Got to quibble.
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 14 2010, 1:27pm
|
"I do not think that Frodo's was a moral failure."
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 2:06pm
|
Thanks for the quote
|
FarFromHome
|
Jul 14 2010, 5:31pm
|
I think I give up.
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 6:37pm
|
Magic vs. mechanical devices
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 14 2010, 6:20pm
|
The Rise of the PCs:
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 14 2010, 6:31pm
|
No, I meant what I said, but
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 3:42pm
|
The Ring Tempts: Individuals react: It is a test
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 3:52pm
|
It's remarkably ineffective, then.
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:03pm
|
A remarkable set of test subjects:
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:50pm
|
Are the hobbits that exceptional?
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 4:59pm
|
Hobbits are exceptional: at least Gandalf says that they are remarkable
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 7:23pm
|
Then it is the non-hobbits who are not exceptional?
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 7:53pm
|
Those in the story that are in the position to be tempted by the One Ring
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 12 2010, 9:25pm
|
The hobbits do not violate the principle of only high powers being tempted by the Ring
|
squire
|
Jul 12 2010, 10:21pm
|
There is also the temptation
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 10:46pm
|
It is precisely because they are exceptional that they are
|
Curious
|
Jul 12 2010, 10:40pm
|
Isildur?
|
Hamfast Gamgee
|
Jul 13 2010, 8:46am
|
Isildur is a ringbearer.
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 12:00pm
|
Denethor and temptation
|
PhantomS
|
Jul 12 2010, 2:25pm
|
The All Purpose Ring of Wonder: It does everything its creator wanted it to do.
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 13 2010, 7:50am
|
"Temptation" defined
|
CuriousG
|
Jul 13 2010, 1:54pm
|
Tolkien said
|
Curious
|
Jul 13 2010, 3:25pm
|
He was
|
xy
|
Jul 13 2010, 5:53pm
|
Gimli, Legolas or Merry and Pippin weren't apparently tempted
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 13 2010, 6:19pm
|
well
|
xy
|
Jul 13 2010, 6:32pm
|
Isn't there a difference
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 11:16am
|
Free will and determinism are both equally true. It is the great paradox.
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 14 2010, 11:57am
|
Maybe.
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 12:05pm
|
So I concede that the ring is very powerful
|
Kangi Ska
|
Jul 14 2010, 12:26pm
|
Possibly.
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 1:53pm
|
How does that work?
|
squire
|
Jul 14 2010, 3:11pm
|
You think Galadriels' tranformation
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 4:34pm
|
I'm willing to contemplate that we are getting nowhere
|
squire
|
Jul 14 2010, 5:16pm
|
Why do you think Legolas and Gimli
|
Curious
|
Jul 14 2010, 6:25pm
|
wait...
|
xy
|
Jul 15 2010, 3:09pm
|
Apparently everyone agrees with you.
|
Curious
|
Jul 15 2010, 4:02pm
|
innocence
|
PhantomS
|
Jul 14 2010, 5:33pm
|
|
|
|