|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
burrahobbit
Rohan
May 27 2008, 3:14pm
Views: 5995
Shortcut
|
Agree- Dol Guldur would work as a climax
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I agree that an epic climax would help the Film2 story. My solution is to push the timeline forward so that the attack on Dol Guldur occurs after The Hobbit and Battle of the Five Armies. In this way the Dol Guldur attack would be the climax of Film2, with the mood of a hollow victory as Sauron escapes only to redouble his strength in Mordor. I know this idea breaks Tolkien's timeline, but I'm not convinced it's necessary that the two battles happen simultaneously. It could be that after the dragon is slain and the orcs defeated that Gandalf's case at the White Council for attacking the Necromancer becomes stronger and leads to the attack. I think having some time between The Hobbit and Film2 would be helpful to smooth over the differences in tone between the stories and avoid needing lots of complicated flashbacks.
View my Hobbit Film Adaptation Discussion
(This post was edited by burrahobbit on May 27 2008, 3:14pm)
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
Is the Single Movie Hobbit a contractual obligation?
|
AlatarVinyamar
|
May 26 2008, 2:28pm
|
Maybe not contractually...
|
leo
|
May 26 2008, 2:40pm
|
I disagree
|
SeanDuff
|
May 26 2008, 3:55pm
|
Late introductions
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 5:25pm
|
Parallel timelines
|
merklynn
|
May 26 2008, 5:54pm
|
Dol Guldur
|
FrodoEyes
|
May 26 2008, 6:19pm
|
The Appendices also say:
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 7:17pm
|
Yeah but that last event took place before the events in...
|
leo
|
May 26 2008, 7:28pm
|
True
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 7:38pm
|
2 centavos-
|
Guillermo
|
May 26 2008, 10:17pm
|
That's very reassuring
|
burrahobbit
|
May 26 2008, 10:32pm
|
Thank you!
|
AlatarVinyamar
|
May 26 2008, 10:46pm
|
Thanks for the clarification
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 11:21pm
|
and that makes me think ..
|
Elven
|
May 26 2008, 11:33pm
|
Thank you ,Guillermo.
|
ShadoFaxs
|
May 27 2008, 1:17am
|
Thank you!
|
Peredhil lover
|
May 27 2008, 5:30am
|
Thank you Guillermo
|
fingolfin_nc
|
May 27 2008, 8:40pm
|
Well
|
Darkstone
|
May 27 2008, 8:58pm
|
And in the end...
|
dernwyn
|
May 28 2008, 12:11am
|
*broad smile* You can't ask better than that!
|
grammaboodawg
|
May 28 2008, 1:18am
|
For Guillermo & Co: A Holm-Related HOBBIT Idea!
|
Faramond
|
Jun 2 2008, 8:18pm
|
The hunt for Gollum
|
Elizabeth
|
May 26 2008, 6:55pm
|
It would make for an interesting movie though
|
leo
|
May 26 2008, 7:30pm
|
Is there a 17-year gap in the film of FotR? //
|
N.E. Brigand
|
May 27 2008, 3:52am
|
Not in the film, but I think it is in the book //
|
Kelvarhin
|
May 27 2008, 4:06am
|
It's not necessarily not in the film
|
Arwen's daughter
|
May 27 2008, 4:33am
|
It was very cleverly done.
|
Elizabeth
|
May 27 2008, 7:33am
|
I always got the impression from the film
|
Kelvarhin
|
May 27 2008, 7:36am
|
You said it
|
Earl
|
May 27 2008, 8:59am
|
I'm hoping for new storylines in Film2
|
burrahobbit
|
May 27 2008, 1:08pm
|
Hmm... you have a point
|
Earl
|
May 27 2008, 1:51pm
|
Gandalf's vigilance good theme
|
burrahobbit
|
May 27 2008, 2:22pm
|
The question is...
|
AlatarVinyamar
|
May 27 2008, 2:35pm
|
Agree- Dol Guldur would work as a climax
|
burrahobbit
|
May 27 2008, 3:14pm
|
I love the Gandalf Vigilante idea
|
Empedocles
|
May 27 2008, 3:14pm
|
17 years
|
FarFromHome
|
May 27 2008, 11:20am
|
It depends on how you look at it
|
Earl
|
May 27 2008, 8:48am
|
|
|
|