|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earl
Forum Admin
/ Moderator
May 27 2008, 8:48am
Views: 26476
Shortcut
|
It depends on how you look at it
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Did the Fellowship remain in Lothlorien for a month? I am sooooo glad we didn't have temporal subtitles during the course of these movies. It would have been just plain silly. Except for "The Shire... 60 years later" I thought the filmmakers were spot on with the way they portrayed the events without concerning themselves with the temporal issue by way of subtitles - book-firsters knew the timelines and it worked for movie firsters who didn't (I am a movie firster by the way). People keep saying the timelines were compressed... but I really don't get what that means. Just because there weren't subtitles that went "17 years later", "1 month later", "10 years ago" etc. doesn't mean that the whole story unfolded over subsequent days.
Crows and Gibbets! What is The House Of Eorl but a thatched barn where brigands drink in the reek, and their brats roll around on the floor with their dogs! You are but a lesser son of greater Sires.
|
|
|
Subject
|
User
|
Time
|
Is the Single Movie Hobbit a contractual obligation?
|
AlatarVinyamar
|
May 26 2008, 2:28pm
|
Maybe not contractually...
|
leo
|
May 26 2008, 2:40pm
|
I disagree
|
SeanDuff
|
May 26 2008, 3:55pm
|
Late introductions
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 5:25pm
|
Parallel timelines
|
merklynn
|
May 26 2008, 5:54pm
|
Dol Guldur
|
FrodoEyes
|
May 26 2008, 6:19pm
|
The Appendices also say:
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 7:17pm
|
Yeah but that last event took place before the events in...
|
leo
|
May 26 2008, 7:28pm
|
True
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 7:38pm
|
2 centavos-
|
Guillermo
|
May 26 2008, 10:17pm
|
That's very reassuring
|
burrahobbit
|
May 26 2008, 10:32pm
|
Thank you!
|
AlatarVinyamar
|
May 26 2008, 10:46pm
|
Thanks for the clarification
|
Altaira
|
May 26 2008, 11:21pm
|
and that makes me think ..
|
Elven
|
May 26 2008, 11:33pm
|
Thank you ,Guillermo.
|
ShadoFaxs
|
May 27 2008, 1:17am
|
Thank you!
|
Peredhil lover
|
May 27 2008, 5:30am
|
Thank you Guillermo
|
fingolfin_nc
|
May 27 2008, 8:40pm
|
Well
|
Darkstone
|
May 27 2008, 8:58pm
|
And in the end...
|
dernwyn
|
May 28 2008, 12:11am
|
*broad smile* You can't ask better than that!
|
grammaboodawg
|
May 28 2008, 1:18am
|
For Guillermo & Co: A Holm-Related HOBBIT Idea!
|
Faramond
|
Jun 2 2008, 8:18pm
|
The hunt for Gollum
|
Elizabeth
|
May 26 2008, 6:55pm
|
It would make for an interesting movie though
|
leo
|
May 26 2008, 7:30pm
|
Is there a 17-year gap in the film of FotR? //
|
N.E. Brigand
|
May 27 2008, 3:52am
|
Not in the film, but I think it is in the book //
|
Kelvarhin
|
May 27 2008, 4:06am
|
It's not necessarily not in the film
|
Arwen's daughter
|
May 27 2008, 4:33am
|
It was very cleverly done.
|
Elizabeth
|
May 27 2008, 7:33am
|
I always got the impression from the film
|
Kelvarhin
|
May 27 2008, 7:36am
|
You said it
|
Earl
|
May 27 2008, 8:59am
|
I'm hoping for new storylines in Film2
|
burrahobbit
|
May 27 2008, 1:08pm
|
Hmm... you have a point
|
Earl
|
May 27 2008, 1:51pm
|
Gandalf's vigilance good theme
|
burrahobbit
|
May 27 2008, 2:22pm
|
The question is...
|
AlatarVinyamar
|
May 27 2008, 2:35pm
|
Agree- Dol Guldur would work as a climax
|
burrahobbit
|
May 27 2008, 3:14pm
|
I love the Gandalf Vigilante idea
|
Empedocles
|
May 27 2008, 3:14pm
|
17 years
|
FarFromHome
|
May 27 2008, 11:20am
|
It depends on how you look at it
|
Earl
|
May 27 2008, 8:48am
|
|
|
|