Magpie
Immortal
Feb 8 2013, 5:36pm
Views: 684
|
I was thinking about this recently. I think studios want someone to sell the movie. A well known name that is popular or proven. (not always the same thing) Those people tend to be slightly older actors. (and I'm using 'older' in a way a studio would use it) But then they need that fresh, young face that will cause people to sit up and take notice. It's interesting to see actors (M & F) go through the fresh, young face stage and then, perhaps onto the established, known, proven face stage. Unfortunately, roles past this slightly older, proven stage drop off and it's only the cream of the crop that find work once they reach a certain age. So we just don't see lots of people once they get older. (and, I think some of them move to the other side of the camera) And those in the fresh, young face stage move up (if they're lucky and/or talented) to the featured, established role. So it looks like they are 'doing better' while the name stars might look like they're falling off. But I think a lot of it is how the industry works. The movie (trailer) that got me thinking this? Jack the Giant Slayer. Established, proven name that is slightly older: Ewan McGregor (he's promoting the movie) Young, fresh face: Nicholas Hoult (from Warm Bodies and About a Boy) Even older, recognizable faces that won't necessarily sell a movie anymore but familiar and comforting nonetheless: Stanley Tucci and Bill Nighy This movie has a lot of people I'm ready to watch including Ian McShane. It looks really, really geared to be a 3D ride extravaganza, though. I hope there's some amount of enjoyable plot otherwise since I wouldn't be watching it in 3D. God help the boy but Robert Pattinson just makes me shudder. He would have a huge hurdle to jump for me to buy him as James Bond.
LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide
|