squire
Half-elven
Dec 28 2012, 11:02pm
Views: 4657
|
I don't think we're on solid ground, when discussing the minds of tyrants, to use Pol Pot and a fictional character as if they were equally illustrative of the same point. Woundwort is comparable to Sauron, of course, because both are fictional expressions of their authors' ideas about the corruption of power. And Pol Pot is an excellent example of a real-world dictator who may (or may not, depending on the reliability of the evidence regarding his state of mind) have engaged in self-deception regarding his own tyrannical rule. The question I would ask is, where did Tolkien and Adams get their ideas about the descent into tyranny? They must be working from their own understanding of the human soul and from examples in history, whether ancient or contemporary. I would look for those examples, rather than compare two authors with similar ideas, if I was inquiring into whether the authors' ideas have validity. For instance: is Tolkien right, when he says in that letter that Gandalf as Ringlord would have been "far worse" than Sauron, because he would have been "self-righteous" rather than merely "righteous"? I admit I'm not really sure what distinction he is making here. As he notes, Gandalf "would have continued to rule and order things for `good', and the benefit of his subjects according to his wisdom (which was and would have remained great)." "Wisdom" as such is a double-edged sword in Tolkien's vocabulary, since both Denethor and Sauron are deemed by Gandalf to be "wise" without having good sense. Yet, how in the quote above is Gandalf's tyranny "far worse" than Sauron's? As far as I can tell when I read the parts of LotR that describe Mordor, Sauron doesn't even pretend to rule his domain "for the benefit of his subjects", yet Tolkien says Gandalf would have. ??? Tolkien seems to be implying that Evil, honestly acting for its own aggrandizement, is in some way superior to Evil that does not admit that it is Evil. I would agree, in a theoretical or theological sense - but somehow I doubt there are any real-world examples of Tolkien's super-fine distinction between self-conscious and self-deceptive Evil in a ruling tyrant. In other words, I suspect that Gandalf would have been "far worse" than Sauron simply because Tolkien's moral philosophy requires that to be the case, rather than because it would actually true in our own real world.
squire online: RR Discussions: The Valaquenta, A Shortcut to Mushrooms, and Of Herbs and Stewed Rabbit Lights! Action! Discuss on the Movie board!: 'A Journey in the Dark'. and 'Designing The Two Towers'. Footeramas: The 3rd (and NOW the 4th too!) TORn Reading Room LotR Discussion; and "Tolkien would have LOVED it!" squiretalk introduces the J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia: A Reader's Diary = Forum has no new posts. Forum needs no new posts.
|