Our Sponsor Sideshow Send us News
Lord of the Rings Tolkien
Search Tolkien
Lord of The RingsTheOneRing.net - Forged By And For Fans Of JRR Tolkien
Lord of The Rings Serving Middle-Earth Since The First Age

Lord of the Rings Movie News - J.R.R. Tolkien

  Main Index   Search Posts   Who's Online   Log in
The One Ring Forums: Tolkien Topics: Gaming and Collecting:
Hobbit Action figures revealed - Bilbo, Gandalf, Thorin
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 11 2012, 1:16am

Post #26 of 51 (3245 views)
Shortcut
Price [In reply to] Can't Post

They are a little high in price for just child's toys. The company describes the 6" figures as collectibles. So being critical is appropriate here.


DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 11 2012, 1:19am

Post #27 of 51 (3382 views)
Shortcut
Some by Toy Biz were excellent [In reply to] Can't Post

But others I wouldn't buy because they looked awful. Most of the versions of Aragorn made me cringe. I think I finally found one toward the later period that I could live with.

The articulation points are clunkier on these, that's for sure. It could be better. But it could be worse.


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 2:14am

Post #28 of 51 (3314 views)
Shortcut
I can let them glower at each other. // [In reply to] Can't Post

 


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 2:19am

Post #29 of 51 (3335 views)
Shortcut
Those prices are comparable to ToyBiz and those were 'toys' [In reply to] Can't Post

I think they're hoping for the best of both worlds: toys for kids... collectible for adults.

And even at that price, I can tell you I found plenty in boxes of toys in garage sales purchased for 8-13 year old.

If you're going to sell to kids, the toys must be durable and preferably bendable.

Even smaller figures clearly meant for kids - like the Avatar, Last Airbender movie toys - are at least $8 new and at full price.

And even not considering them to be toys... I don't think they were bad. I would buy them and be happy with them.


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Mauricio
Bree

Jul 11 2012, 3:15am

Post #30 of 51 (3304 views)
Shortcut
That's how Bilbo will LOOK like wearing the ring... [In reply to] Can't Post

So we'll actually get to see him this time around??

I mean from an objective POV.

Hello everybody, please help win tickets for The Dark Knight Rises premiere in Mexico City, all you have to do is "Like" the drawing on the following link:
http://www.facebook.com/...theater¬if_t=like
Thanks, it really means a lot!!


DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 11 2012, 3:25am

Post #31 of 51 (3304 views)
Shortcut
Did I really pay that much? [In reply to] Can't Post

I assumed they were cheaper, since I have so many of them. But I don't remember now.


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 4:57am

Post #32 of 51 (3334 views)
Shortcut
It depended [In reply to] Can't Post

I found some cheaper at times. But when I wanted a figure that was harder to find, I would pay the higher 'suggested' price.

Dang, I think I even sent to England for one of them!

Those prices usually aren't what one ends up paying. They are 'suggested retail price'.


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 5:00am

Post #33 of 51 (3298 views)
Shortcut
Do you mean... will there be like a ghost image of him? [In reply to] Can't Post

Did you see the Frodo with the Ring figure? It was a ToyBiz figure but it looked pretty similar to this Bilbo one. So, I don't think what the toy looks like is indicative of what Bilbo will look like wearing the Ring.

(if fact, Frodo wearing the Ring is one of the toys I wouldn't have bought full price but I found at a thrift store or garage sale. He's sitting on the shelf with all my Elves)


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Radagast-Aiwendil
Gondor


Jul 11 2012, 9:47am

Post #34 of 51 (3337 views)
Shortcut
Sorry I may have caused a misunderstanding [In reply to] Can't Post

That was not meant to be offensive in any way, and I am certainly not trying to insult anyone.What I meant was that once this would have appealed to me, and it does for others of all sorts of ages, and I was trying to apologize for the harshness of my first comment. Obviously I went about it in the wrong way, forgetting that it is so easy to misinterpret online.
Seriously, I meant no offence whatsoever.

"A Wizard is never late, Frodo Baggins. Nor is he early: he arrives precisely when he means to!"-Gandalf the Grey, The Fellowship of the Ring.

(This post was edited by Radagast-Aiwendil on Jul 11 2012, 9:49am)


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 11:36am

Post #35 of 51 (3283 views)
Shortcut
no no... no insult taken. Read that with me laughing [In reply to] Can't Post

That was just my indicating that I am very old to be buying toys. :-) I was laughing at myself as I am this old woman running around buying toys (actually, way more than LOTR toys but that's another magpie story)

Sorry to come off in an completely unintended way and distress you. I took no offense at all.


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Radagast-Aiwendil
Gondor


Jul 11 2012, 12:44pm

Post #36 of 51 (3249 views)
Shortcut
Ok glad to hear it [In reply to] Can't Post

It didn't distress me don't worry, just wanted to make sure I hadn't offended. Glad to hear I didn't.Smile

"A Wizard is never late, Frodo Baggins. Nor is he early: he arrives precisely when he means to!"-Gandalf the Grey, The Fellowship of the Ring.


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 1:05pm

Post #37 of 51 (3266 views)
Shortcut
I could have phrased it better [In reply to] Can't Post

I always try to re-read what I write to get a sense of how a tone might be misunderstood. I can see where that one was and I don't know what excuse I had for not re-reading it well enough. I tend to take a dry humor approach about my many collections and obsessions.


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Magpie
Immortal


Jul 11 2012, 11:29pm

Post #38 of 51 (3286 views)
Shortcut
photos from Comic-con showing up. [In reply to] Can't Post

http://www.scribblelive.com/...aspx?PostId=34762649 Bilbo
http://www.scribblelive.com/...aspx?PostId=34762842 Gandalf
http://www.scribblelive.com/...aspx?PostId=34762988 Thorin
http://www.scribblelive.com/...aspx?PostId=34763045 Combo Pack


Catch more photos in the Twitter Feed on this page - hopefully they'll show up in the photo gallery soon:
http://www.theonering.net/live/comiccon/hobbit/


LOTR soundtrack website ~ magpie avatar gallery
TORn History Mathom-house ~ Torn Image Posting Guide


Carne
Tol Eressea

Jul 11 2012, 11:45pm

Post #39 of 51 (3306 views)
Shortcut
Not impressed with those at all [In reply to] Can't Post

Frown


DanielLB
Immortal


Jul 12 2012, 4:06pm

Post #40 of 51 (3278 views)
Shortcut
How come? [In reply to] Can't Post

Figures aren't my thing, so I have nothing good or bad to say.


SolidSnakeEyes
Registered User

Jul 13 2012, 1:45pm

Post #41 of 51 (3247 views)
Shortcut
I'm suprirsed [In reply to] Can't Post

I was expecting much worse from these figures, and can say that I've been pleasantly surprised. It's the manufacturers first real attempt at action figures, and they turned out better than some you can find in stores now (MIB 3, for example). Sure, they really don't seem to match up to TB's awesome line, but they'll do. Being a huge figure collector (and Tolkien fan), this many years without LOTR or Hobbit toys has been painful haha :p

Oh, and this is my first post...so, hello! :)


robby the robot
Registered User

Jul 13 2012, 8:55pm

Post #42 of 51 (3213 views)
Shortcut
I also agree : disappointing in comparision with Toybiz / Play Along [In reply to] Can't Post

I was hoping for better quality.
However, they did know the quality of ToyBiz and Play Along figures ( as reference)
They are really "toys". Gandalf is "bad", others are more or less acceptable.
I have plenty of TB action figures but I will NOT got those.
It's their first shot and I hope they will improve the quality as soon as possible.

FrownUnsureUnimpressedSmile


DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 14 2012, 5:59am

Post #43 of 51 (3187 views)
Shortcut
Hello! [In reply to] Can't Post

Good to hear you aren't too disappointed. I like the 6" scale, but the 3.75" ones...well they are sort of cute, but that's about all.


DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 14 2012, 6:02am

Post #44 of 51 (3254 views)
Shortcut
Must be the smaller scale here [In reply to] Can't Post

They certainly aren't the same quality as the 6".


Dwalin
Rivendell

Jul 19 2012, 4:14pm

Post #45 of 51 (3180 views)
Shortcut
3.75 Line [In reply to] Can't Post

I think the 3.75 line looks great as well! Does anyone have an idea about the specific articulation on those figures? It looks like it varies.


DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 19 2012, 6:14pm

Post #46 of 51 (3248 views)
Shortcut
Have you checked [In reply to] Can't Post

Some of the toy review sites have more pictures, can't remember which at this moment, but I saved the links. I'll post some comparisons of the larger and smaller scale for the three that have both later today.


DarkJackal
Rohan


Jul 20 2012, 12:09am

Post #47 of 51 (3262 views)
Shortcut
3.75" and 6" Bridge Direct vs. Toy Biz [In reply to] Can't Post

I just found these reviews by people who went to Comic-con or bought the invisible Bilbo. The first is also great in that it shows new 6" invisible Bilbo with some old Toy Biz figures for comparison!

http://thefwoosh.com/...hobbit-bilbo-baggins

http://www.actionfigurepics.com/...he-hobbit#more-15785

http://thefwoosh.com/...bridge-direct-hobbit


stormcrow20
Gondor


Jul 25 2012, 6:02am

Post #48 of 51 (3173 views)
Shortcut
Toy Biz Aragorn [In reply to] Can't Post

I vaguely remember reading that the first Strider figure was delayed (and therefore difficult to find) because the facial scanning technology they used to capture actor likenesses was having trouble with Viggo. It might have been the stubble? I can't recall the specifics. Apparently that issue persisted, because every version of Aragorn looked rather different!



"Good Morning!"



(This post was edited by stormcrow20 on Jul 25 2012, 6:04am)


stormcrow20
Gondor


Jul 25 2012, 6:17am

Post #49 of 51 (3505 views)
Shortcut
Toy Biz [In reply to] Can't Post

By the end of the line in 2005, the highly detailed and very articulated 6 inch figures by Toy Biz were approximately $8 (give or take) at major retailers, and slightly more at higher-end stores. These days, with rising oil and production costs, quality and detail just aren't what they used to be. A simple 3.75 inch figure now costs $8-10, with 6 inch figures at $15-20 at major retailers. And as you can see, the new 6 inch figures feature less detail, with less and simpler articulation.

For mass market action figures, the high quality of the Toy Biz LotR figures were an exception even in their time, and almost an impossibility today. Having said that, I was still among those that were hoping for better quality for the Hobbit figures. I think you summed it up rather nicely: "It could be better. But it could be worse."

I wanted better, but these aren't so bad that I won't be getting every last one of them!



"Good Morning!"



(This post was edited by stormcrow20 on Jul 25 2012, 6:23am)


NydiaVita
Registered User

May 21 2013, 7:09am

Post #50 of 51 (2601 views)
Shortcut
The Lord of the Rings Frodo Baggings Action Figure $10 By Free Delivery [In reply to] Can't Post

The original price is $19.99 of this action figure now just cut to be a half which is only $10. However, the quality wonĄŻt be reduced at the same time. Our products are all made manually by nice materials and also handworks. There are other models available for you to select, and price is also the most reasonable in ACGON.
http://www.acgon.com/...83-91c541267e1b.html


(This post was edited by Ataahua on May 22 2013, 3:37am)

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All
 
 

Search for (options) Powered by Gossamer Forum v.1.2.3

home | advertising | contact us | back to top | search news | join list | Content Rating

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings, and is in no way affiliated with Tolkien Enterprises or the Tolkien Estate. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, articles, and other promotional materials are held by their respective owners and their use is allowed under the fair use clause of the Copyright Law. Design and original photography however are copyright © 1999-2012 TheOneRing.net. Binary hosting provided by Nexcess.net

Do not follow this link, or your host will be blocked from this site. This is a spider trap.