Aug 4 2012, 5:32am
Well done and an extremely thought out "defense".
Although I will admit that i have some questions and concerns about what appeared to be a "late" decision to do 3 films, I have always defended the idea that there was PLENTY of material in The Hobbit and appendices to easily have 2 films and also enough for a third. A LOT happens...and if the evidence that is in the book isn't enough to illustrate that, then this argument certainly does.
TORn member formally known as ryan1976.
(This post was edited by Buchanicus on Aug 4 2012, 5:32am)