
Chen G.
Mithlond
Feb 20, 5:06pm
Views: 367
|
|
In other words, nothing but speculation
|
|
|
Speculation is not what I would consider to be substantive evidence. All the substantive evidence points towards it being Peter's idea, and nothing of what you presented is good enough grounds to question his integrity, especially since it's something he's pulled again since with his Beatles documentary. The Dol Guldur scenes you dismiss as filler? Peter had talked about wanting to film those since 2003. Legolas? Jackson mentions he could have a role in the films during an interview from late 2006. As I said the production is very well-documented and we can trace how the idea came to pass and why.
(This post was edited by Chen G. on Feb 20, 5:08pm)
|